Probably
the worst thing the movie does is betray the viewer's trust with a crucial, shameless, and indefensible misdirect, one of a few moments designed to free the film from convention that instead only underscore this isn't as clever or different as it thinks it is.
Not exact matches
It's really easy to make really
bad movies about really good
things because you can just pretend to understand what they do.
There are plenty of
worse things in this world to complain about than the content of a
movie.
But in the spirit of the «
things are getting better and
worse» theory that animates the unflinching realism of postmodern conservatism, I have to add that AVALON is the sappiest or most «cloying» of Levinson's Baltimore
movies.
If you haven't heard about the
movie, it's a cross between The Hangover, Bridesmaids, and Very
Bad Things.
While watching a
movie or television together isn't a
bad thing, the time that will really benefit children is when distractions are eliminated and a child has mom or dad's undivided attention.
The biggest
thing you should take away from this
movie is the fact that your body is not a
badly made machine!
I do not think those measures are necessary, as
bad as piracy is right now, the
movie companies are still making plenty of money from publishing DVDs and etc, so why do these
things that will affect no one but your legitimate buyers?
You might be thinking, «ugh, yet another
movie on how
bad things are,» and you'd be right.
Salt does
worse things than make you feel chubby (and we aren't referring to the
movie with Angelina Jolie).
However it got me thinking about the trend itself — I wondered if without noticing I've started living in a world of «fash - un» where every trend is for wearing regardless of which 90's
movie it brings to mind (and more to the point — is it
bad that I think the clueless reference is a good
thing?).
The
movie's approach is not a
bad thing, but it is a different
movie experience for
Terrible
movies saved by hot women
Bad movies are often plagued by one or more
things that make them unredeemable.
Bad movies are often plagued by one or more
things that make them unredeemable.
I am outgoing, love having family time playing uno having
movie night is a must... love going to church and looking for someone who will be there when
things are good and
bad
Combining my knowledge of
movies and online dating, today I'm bringing you nine films — from rom - coms to thrillers to documentaries — that showcase both the good and
bad of online dating, and that can teach us a
thing or two about finding love on the web.
The
worst thing is if the picture that was posted belongs to a photo of a
movie star or his friend or cousin.
What's the Deal: More character study than action
movie, this adaptation of Martin Booth's 1990 novel «A Very Private Gentleman» is instead concerned with the inner workings of its amoral antihero, whom we witness do very
bad things at film's start that haunt him until the very end.
One of the many good
things in this
movie was the fact that not only the writers of horror
movies do
bad things to their victims but also and many times much
worse to their evil monsters.
Still, Very
Bad Things isn't a terrible
movie - it certainly isn't in the same league as puerile dreck like Mary.
That being said, Very
Bad Things is ultimately redeemed by a finale that's just jaw - dropping in its cruelty towards the remaining survivors - thus clinching the
movie's status as one of the more effective black comedies to come around in quite some time.
Probably the
worst thing is that this
movie is pretentious as hell.
And it's
things in between, because the first two
movies in this universe have been all about why heroism is essentially
bad.
As good as the film comes across, it is also a
movie that I've seen numerous times before, on some level, whether it be BACHELOR PARTY or even VERY
BAD THINGS.
But fake realism could be the
worst thing to happen to a
movie.
The Moneyball of football
movies and that's not a
bad thing.
However, he was hardly the
worst thing about the
movie.
George Raft is pretty boring and the most interesting
thing he's got going in Invisible Stripes is the disturbing relationship with his mother (which incidentally isn't worth watching the
movie for) but its nice to see Bogart not play a total
bad guy.
this
movie was horrible i didn't like it at all and it was the
worst thing ive ever seen it was just a complete waste of time the biggest waste of 1 hour and 34 minutes i wish i could have that time back
Here are all the
things you will discover in Show Dogs: embarrassingly
bad CGI; pratfalls; a dog biting FBI butt; dog farts; testicle humor (multiple instances); a giant
movie - long promo for a major hotel on the Vegas Strip that I won't name because they didn't pay me to promote them; denigration of cat ladies; horrible clichés and stereotypes.
Bad Hollywood
movies sporting big price tags are one
thing — never much fun to watch, they can at least be a pleasure to ridicule.
No matter how
bad things get in his recent apocalyptic action
movies, action star Dwayne Johnson frequently seems in a weirdly good mood.
It's certainly not a
BAD movie, but Columbus knew it was a sure
thing and took the safe way out.
But - as this
movie goes to show - that's no
bad thing by any stretch of the imagination.
I went to the official site for very
bad things - parts of it were as delightfully deranged as the
movie.
VERY
BAD THINGS looks like an Ensemble
movie with very few redeeming qualities, other than Beautiful Cameron, Nicholson-esque Slater, and always amusing Piven.
Echols thought the
movie was
bad, but I'll bet he will be tempted, for old time's sake, to see two other remakes of films he remembers from before his fall: Footloose and The
Thing.
If you have Starz On Demand then watching this
movie isn't the
worst thing you can do, especially with Did You hear about the Morgans?
«Baden Baden» does make a pertinent statement, one rare in
movies today: that being ostensibly aimless in your mid-20s not only isn't the
worst thing in the world, but it can also be kind of fun.
The
worst thing about Thor: Ragnarok is that it's a superhero
movie which is part of a massive expanded universe, and which carries all the baggage that comes with those
things.
shrieks Paul Giamatti's squirrelly record executive, sounding very much like a character in a
movie insisting on the historical importance of its subjects, which isn't necessarily a
bad thing.
In «Last Flag Flying,» director Richard Linklater comes to grips with a reality of life that most people (and
movies) would prefer to deny:
Bad things can happen from which there is no recovery.
And while you can admire, in theory, a
movie about that kind of stasis — about a real - life situation in which
things are
bad and can only, maybe, get ever - so - slightly better — in actual practice, this is a film as depressed as its characters.
I do think it has some issues with the acting, but when the
worst thing you can say about the
movie is that Bryan Cranston's hair piece was pretty
bad then you have a moderate action
movie success.
The squeal wasn't all that great just like the first
movie, but the
movie itself wasn't like the
worse thing ever as some people have make it out to be.
Another
thing this
movie borrows from its predecessors is the black and white demarcation line between the good and
bad guys.
However, it will be interesting to see if the
movie will gain any traction with those not familiar with his oeuvre (though if fans of Adam Brody get turned on to Stillman, that can't be a
bad thing), but longtime fans will be glad to know that Stillman is back — and it's like he was never gone.
Things only get
worse (meaning better) as the
movie progresses.
The first half of the
movie is not that great, filled with way too much
bad acting, including that of the lead actors, but once
things get going in the end of the second and into the third acts, the film turns into a pretty decent revenge flick.
Critic Consensus: The
movie works when
things are on fire, but everything else - from dialogue to characters - is scathingly
bad.