Sentences with phrase «write in a scientific way»

There's more to it than that... another major hurdle you'd have to face is being able to write in a scientific way.

Not exact matches

But while it is hard to imagine theologians writing scientific papers that use the Bible's cosmology or creation account in a literal way, as though Copernicus or Darwin never lived, theologians and clergy abound who accept the Bible's communitarian social framework as normative for political - economic analysis today.

I would be interested in anything that you, as a 21st century member of the religious cult, might have to say, but am not interested in anything written so long ago by bronze age or iron age cult members because they really knew nothing about the world and believed in gods the same way any primitive man did... through scientific ignorance.

Wilson gives full play to his prejudices and preconceptions in a way that he would find preposterous if indulged in by a scientific colleague writing about science.

«Dr. Johnston... developed this sudden and seemingly urgent interest in this issue not via a last minute clinical review of the scientific literature, or even after consulting with the AAP's own recognized lactation science experts... his concern came immediately after aggressive, personal lobbying by representatives of one of the AAP's biggest financial contributors, the $ 3 billion U.S. infant formula industry,» wrote lactivist Katie Allison Granju in «The Milky Way of Doing Business,» a rebuttal to the AAP's actions regarding the campaign.

The book, whilst complex in content was written in a way which was understandable for most people and not too scientific.

«We were looking for projects that could really represent breakthroughs — those that could really change the way we think,» Jack Dixon, HHMI's vice president and chief scientific officer, wrote in the Collaborative Innovation Awards announcement.

Indeed, I still try not to become too distant from the world of real scientific discovery, and since starting at SBS, I have contributed in very minor ways to ongoing research projects and have written an undergraduate textbook about ecology.

A group of researchers who devise and study metrics of research productivity and success wrote in 2012 that «the best way of predicting a scientist's future success is for peers to evaluate scientific contributions and research depth.»

The media industry is changing in ways that make it difficult to predict the future of science writing, says Mariette DiChristina, president of NASW and executive editor of Scientific American.

Provide evidence (in your writing sample) that you can take a complex scientific topic and explain it in a way that most people would both understand and find interesting.

► Iran's agreement on Tuesday to «dismantle large pieces of its nuclear program in exchange for lifting crippling economic sanctions... paves the way for a rapid expansion of scientific cooperation with Iran in areas as diverse as fusion, astrophysics, and cancer therapy using radioisotopes,» Richard Stone wrote that day at ScienceInsider.

«I believe the career I have carved out for myself will help pave the way for future generations of underrepresented minority scientists to thrive, and for all members of the scientific community to be more culturally sensitive than those who came before them,» Smith wrote in a column published in the 30 September edition of Science disclosing his own experiences with bias.

May it serve as a warning not only to policymakers, but also to researchers, clinicians, peer reviewers, journal editors, and journalists of the need to consider the harm to scientific credibility and public health when dealing with studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results — and to find better ways to fund such studies and to prevent, disclose and manage potentially conflicted interests,» writes Marion Nestle, Ph.D., M.P.H., of New York University, in a related commentary.

Dr. Nancy Appleton wrote a book in 2004 called «Lick the Sugar Habit,» with the ways that medical journals and other scientific publications have documented that sugar wrecks your health.

Writing it, I couldn't find any sound scientific research that would support the somewhat popular belief that microwaving is unhealthy in any way.

As you can see from what we've written, Ghee is reputed to have many health benefits, some which seem to be based in scientific fact, and some that are of a more apocryphal nature; that is often the way when it comes down to alternative medicine cultures and natural product benefits.

Not only is it well written, it's written in a way I can understand and not all scientific or medical terminology.

They read a novel about life in urban America, they write letters to city council members and state representatives, the compile statistics to support their arguments in their letters; in short, they use their discipline - based skills of scientific inquiry, math, literacy, social studies and health to do what people in the real world do — synthesize the skills and knowledge in a meaningful way.

It is not so much important, in what way scientific results were received - based on the theoretical generalizations of the already known facts (with the possible use of logical or mathematical modeling), or the facts, empirically received by the analysis paper writing.

They also need to write about them and, in the process, incorporate media theory, game studies, film criticism, anthropology, history, philosophy, and scientific studies, perhaps as a way of indicating that they are engaging in art making rather than basic Internet use.

One may put up all kinds of arguments to discredit this obvious scientific fact of life in 2018 ongoing, and get lost in distractions about mathematical trend lines extracting out la nina and el ninos, but that is entirely IRRELEVANT to what I have written, and am addressing here, in my own way.

In typed letter on 9/22/09 Tom Karl wrote: «We at NOAA / NCDC seek a way forward to cooperate with you, and are interested in joint scientific inquirIn typed letter on 9/22/09 Tom Karl wrote: «We at NOAA / NCDC seek a way forward to cooperate with you, and are interested in joint scientific inquirin joint scientific inquiry.

So, indeed, get the text, and then maybe also write something about how this book has really gone off in a biased way here — putting in personal interpretations rather than helping students gain insight into how to approach challenging scientific questions (maybe also cover how the IPCC experience grew out of the CFC - ozone experience and how the Montreal Protocol has worked, etc..

However, I work pretty hard at my writing and I think it is much more understandable to a broader audience to write this way than in scientific journalese.

In that post, I noted how Dr Schneider offered one slightly more subtle variation of Gelbspan's favorite phrase in 2009 — «Journalist Ross Gelbspan wrote a book called The Heat is On... Citing leaked internal GCC documents, he reported that their plan was to «reposition'the debate as «theory, not fact»» — and on another occasion a year earlier offered one quite a bit more subtle — «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with.&raquIn that post, I noted how Dr Schneider offered one slightly more subtle variation of Gelbspan's favorite phrase in 2009 — «Journalist Ross Gelbspan wrote a book called The Heat is On... Citing leaked internal GCC documents, he reported that their plan was to «reposition'the debate as «theory, not fact»» — and on another occasion a year earlier offered one quite a bit more subtle — «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with.&raquin 2009 — «Journalist Ross Gelbspan wrote a book called The Heat is On... Citing leaked internal GCC documents, he reported that their plan was to «reposition'the debate as «theory, not fact»» — and on another occasion a year earlier offered one quite a bit more subtle — «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with.»

If you are able to properly confute a proposed theory, you have plenty of resourses to do it in the proper way in the open scientific debate with valid and objective arguments by writing a proper comment / rebuttal.

Now, on a matter of vital importance (global warming), I think we are seeing problems that occur when a person without a rigorous completed scientific background writes about science in such a way that he casts considerable doubt on the findings of a huge number of scientists and major scientific bodies.

This is one area, where the scientific publications are often written in a way that appears to give justification for thinking that they are biased.

If I was engaging in a for - profit activity (writing a book that will be sold or starting a monetized blog, for example) that required the use of many scientific facts, how would I go about collecting that information in a way so as to avoid a copyright issue?

He has written 10 books and 150 scientific publications, including Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy and The Mindful Way Workbook — a patient guide for achieving mood balance in everyday life.

To promote the recognition of Indigenous knowledge, she cited the work in the 1990s of non-Indigenous scholar Michael Christie, who wrote that the Aboriginal scientific system, in its own sphere, «is impressively ecological, in a way in which ours is not».