Sentences with phrase «writers and readers in»

The content we post needs to be practical and plainly stated, providing information for writers and readers in a unique or profound way.

The team uses every tool at our disposal — both the timeless and the newest — to connect writers and readers in the most effective way.

«A wonderful event that brings together writers and readers in a classy and beautiful city.»

Just how far is a service like Scribd prepared to go in risking the displeasure of such a well - connected community of writers and readers in active touch with each other?

Heinemann has produced two DVDs of Nancie and her student writers and readers in action, Writing in the Middle and Reading in the Middle, with all royalties benefiting tuition assistance at CTL.

Not exact matches

When Wattpad launched in 2006 as an online — and now mobile — community for readers and writers to share free books, CEO Allen Lau and his team were working out of a drab cubicle farm in Toronto's north end, with bankers and accountants for neighbours.

The company became known as a content farm in part because it paid writers very little, and the content catered specifically to search engines rather than readers.

You acquire the skill that is indispensable to all artists and entrepreneurs — the ability to switch back and forth in your imagination from your own point of view as writer / painter / seller to the point of view of your reader / gallery - goer / customer.

We have big plans to provide our readers with more features and improve their experience in the near future, including bringing on more great writers, producing analysis for other industries that are often overlooked.

Some writers have told our readers about their journey to their overseas home — how and why they chose their new retirement destination... how their lives have changed for the better... and what it is that they love about the place they now live in.

A story with millions of your own adventure in it — looking for readers, writers, ghost writers, authors, editors, reporters, journalists, bloggers, influencers, entrepreneurs, sponsors like you who want to help by giving $ 1 or more and spreading this campaign and the story to the world.

The Snip online community connects writers to < br / > readers directly, mitigating the risk of censorship and bias inherent in the < br / > legacy news industry.This < br / > entire process is seamless, with end users able to take in their own collection < br / > of snippets which are personalized through machine learning algorithms.

European Christendom already appeared to be in terminal decay, and Kierkegaard's main purpose as a writer was to awaken his readers and to convince them of the necessity, and difficulty, of radical Christian discipleship.

Writers in the Old West, would inflate the feats of a gunslinger to thrill their readers, and to establish him as «the fastest gun in the west!».

The writer is just projecting his own desire onto readers and his conclusions have no basis in reality.

For readers and potential writers, here are some of the qualities we tend to look for in selecting verse: First, some indication that the poet has read more deeply than R. S. Gwynn's Narcissus in The Narcissiad, who «knows his poets, too, for he has read / The works of many, three of whom are dead.»

Regardless, one of the drawbacks of writing books and blogs is that tone of voice does not always come across to readers in the way the writer intended.

No question about it, the listening is demanding, not only because of the writer's rhetorical style but also because of the assumption that the reader knows the Old Testament and the wilderness life of Israel, a life centered in the tabernacle and the daily ministrations of the priest.

But for the reader the volume lacks a sense of flow or unity because with each essay one has to determine not only how the Jewish writers are thinking of Christians and how the Christian writer is understanding Jews but what kind of Jew and what kind of Christian are being brought together in this particular chapter.

The earliest of the three (St. Mark) is clearly the work of a writer almost obsessed by the apologetic necessity of somehow making intelligible to his readers the scandalous outcome in rejection and death of the ministry of one whom he clearly believed to be the expected Messiah.

When one looks at the myths of surrounding cultures, in fact, one senses that the current debate over creationism would have seemed very strange, if not unintelligible, to the writers and readers of Genesis.

«The Festival of Faith and Writing at Calvin College is a biennial conference that brings together writers, editors, publishers, musicians, artists, and readers for three days of discussing and celebrating insightful writing that explores, in some significant way, issues of faith.»

Yet there ought to be a clear distinction in our thinking between a critique of the effects of this genre, with its deceptive promises of liberation, and a more empathic inquiry into the writers and especially the readers of this literature, those searching for some kind of encouragement and relief that they have failed to find elsewhere.

In the writers» witness to God and communication about him God witnesses to himself and communicates personally with the hearer or reader.

And Zora Neale Hurston, one of the most renowned Afro - American woman writers, wrote reactionary essays (some of which appeared in the Reader's Digest) and gave her allegiance to the Republican Party — facts often overlooked by her contemporary feminist followeAnd Zora Neale Hurston, one of the most renowned Afro - American woman writers, wrote reactionary essays (some of which appeared in the Reader's Digest) and gave her allegiance to the Republican Party — facts often overlooked by her contemporary feminist followeand gave her allegiance to the Republican Party — facts often overlooked by her contemporary feminist followers.

It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.

In so doing, some sacrifice of completeness has been made, but by this means the reader will be able to understand that both these writers have a single purpose: to declare the meaning and content of the ministry, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

There is a school of thought that advises us to «think biblically,» and yet neglects «the social consciousness of the meaning of words,» and «the exact contribution made by a word in its context and communicated between the speaker and the hearer, or the writer and the reader.»

However, I do not believe that it was based on the evolving knowledge, thought, and understanding of the writers, but done / shown in a way so the reader would come to understanding in a proccess that would make sense.

«Suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief is a term coined in 1817 by the poet and aesthetic philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who suggested that if a writer could infuse a «human interest and a semblance of truth» into a fantastic tale, the reader would suspend judgment concerning the implausibility of the narrative.»

If a Catholic literary revival is to occur in the U.S. (or anywhere else), it will come from writers and readers, not the hierarchy.

But the only thing that each of us can and should do is what we each must do ultimately alone, if we have vocations to be writers: Go off and write out of the very fullness of human experience about the very fullness of human experience and hope to find and affect contemporary readers and the greater world, and in the meantime leave the distracting and finally pointless diagnoses of who were the Catholic writers, and how much, and how well, how little, how importantly, to the critics and scholars.

I wish that all your readers were cognizant of this, yet in my own experiences as a writer who advocates for the full and equal inclusion of women in the church, I am all too familiar with the push back.

As predictable and pat as the Esquire piece may be, there's little doubt that the new consensus on family — «straight people blew up marriage a long time ago» — has powerful adherents quite a bit further up in the clouds than the average Esquire reader, or writer.

The writer has in view the disturbed political situation of the late fifties or early sixties, the «wars and rumours of wars» upon the eastern frontier of the Empire, the famines and earthquake shocks recorded under Claudius and Nero, and the growing isolation and unpopularity of the Christian Church; but he is concerned to assure his readers that» the end is not yet.»

For a generation or more biblical scholarship has been committed to what is known as the historical method — that is, to the aim of seeing the books of the Bible in their historical setting and understanding them as nearly as possible in the way their writers and first readers understood them.

It was this faith that enabled Paul, along with the rest of the NT writers, to enjoin their readers to meet their trials and tragedies with endurance and thanksgiving and joy in their Lord.

And they have the right to print articles that reflect what they and their writers and readers believe And they have the right to print articles that reflect what they and their writers and readers believe and their writers and readers believe and readers believe in.

These are but a few illustrations of a characteristic ardent, vivid quality in Jesus» teaching which no reader of the Synoptic Gospels can miss, and, we might add, which no writer of the Synoptic Gospels could have invented.

For this reason the writer must «foresee all possible meanings a statement may have for any possible reader in any possible situation, and you have to make your language work so as to come clear all by itself.»

According to Whitehead, the interrelated nature of meaning allows for the differences in meaning that can occur between the speaker and the hearer, and more importantly, between the writer and the reader.

Quite self - evident to me if you read the whole context... the gospel writer seems to be concerned that the reader understand...» and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me.

It is also true that it belongs to all great literature, and not least to the Bible, to evoke in the mind of the reader meanings and associations which may have nothing to do with the circumstances of its origin, or the intentions of its writers, and yet may bring genuine illumination and enrichment to the mind.

This gives you plenty of time to learn the ropes, find your voice, and make a few mistakes before readers start disseminating your ideas via links, Twitter, and Facebook... which is an especially good thing for writers like me who like to dabble in controversial topics like evolution, women and the church, Calvinism vs. Arminianism, doubt, politics, and cookie - stuffed cookies.

As one reader posted on the on «line bookstore, Amazon.com, «Ms. Walker is truly one of the most daring writers of the twentieth century... [but] I found the details of the lesbian lovemaking to be more than I ever wanted to know about lesbian relationships» and the assumption that my dead relatives spy on me in my bed quite revolting.

But after many months among Rusty and the others in the office, along with conversations and correspondence with First Things writers and readers, our web columnists and the attendees at seminars and retreats, the horizon has expanded.

Updike presents the reader of his novels and stories with the pseudo — wise men of today's society — with Jimmy, the big Mouseketeer who quotes Socrates; with the neon owl that advertises pretzels; with Ken Whitman, the scientist living in Tarbox who is considered intelligent in his field but who lacks a basic understanding of life; with Bech the writer, honored in direct proportion to the decline of his literary production; with Connor, the efficient, well - trained administrator of the old people's home who fails to comprehend as much of life's mystery as his simple and sometimes senile wards do.

I received many, many messages from readers offering counter-evidence to my complaint in the form of notable contemporary writers who do engage faith matters in their fiction, and indeed Image journal has developed a list of what it calls «the Image Top 50 Contemporary Writers of Faith» in response to thewriters who do engage faith matters in their fiction, and indeed Image journal has developed a list of what it calls «the Image Top 50 Contemporary Writers of Faith» in response to theWriters of Faith» in response to the essay.

In a few cases this will undoubtedly be true, but if the general run of readers of the book — and it is not designed for specialists in the field — are anything at all like the students who, across the years, have enrolled in the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detaileIn a few cases this will undoubtedly be true, but if the general run of readers of the book — and it is not designed for specialists in the field — are anything at all like the students who, across the years, have enrolled in the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailein the field — are anything at all like the students who, across the years, have enrolled in the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailein the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailein the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailed.

When I saw the beginning of this post in my news reader I thought you were repeating posts and was going to make reference to the Hollywood writer's strike.