Sentences with phrase «writers know about»

Our expert writers know all about how to create the most effective and powerful document that will help you to achieve what you really want.

Few writers know about luxury travel and trends as well as Suze, author of the Luxury Columnist blog.

What should aspiring writers know about the experience of working with an independent press?

The post 3 Secrets Great Writers Know About Experimental Fiction appeared first on The Write Practice.

Just let the writers know about your requirement and get you assignments in your hand within no time.

Let writers know about Archway Publishing to earn income for yourself or your organization.

We are here for your help, just let our writers know about it.

All great writers know about the importance of editing.

The writer know about as much about the iPad as I do yet he states that, «its (Apple's) iPad falls way short of all expectations».

and you can try only writers knows about that art

My educated guess about how the Desmogblog writer knows about the scans: Gelbspan was that site's star blogger from 2006 to 2011; Desmogblog's Jim Hoggan noted in his January 2008 piece «s 4th paragraph, «Ross Gelbspan, whose defining books Boiling Point and The Heat is On were a big part of the inspiration for starting the DeSmogBlog...»; and Gelbspan himself corroborated that just 6 seconds into this November 2012 audio interview, (backup here)

Not exact matches

Speaking about Douglass in the present tense, Trump praised his accomplishments and claimed that the former slave and celebrated writer was becoming more well - known.

Kristi Hines: A blogger and freelance writer, Hines knows a thing or two about content marketing.

«The moment you think you know everything about your business is the moment you lose your competitive edge,» says Pat Flynn, a San Diego - based writer who focuses on online entrepreneurship.

Online, my social - media universe was filled with journalists and Jewish communal professionals, rabbis and professors and nonprofit workers, all of whom knew that a Tablet writer had said something offensive about the Harvey Weinstein case — but outside my front door, I encountered people who didn't inhabit my social - media universe.

If you know anything about the history of the bible you know it was created by many writers, compiled and edited by Roman emperors, added to, translated, interpreted and actually pretty much ignored — except for a few sentences that sound old fashioned that people use to justify their beliefs and actions.

Think of what we learn from the stories of Flannery O'Connor, a lesser writer than Twain, certainly, but one who knew something very important about the world he didn't.

Ironically, much of what we know about the persecution comes not from Christian sources but rather Roman writers.

Ancient writers mentioned a number of other gospels which they knew about, but which apparently no longer survive.

In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.

Theo Of course we all knew that Dan Brown was a writer of fiction, now about your proof that Saul of Tarsus was not; we are waiting.

But God has worked throught he writers of the Bible to get «in there» what He wants known about Himself.

the writer of this article is an idiot and he is not educated and does not have a brain because he has written it with out having any info about it.thats why little knowledge is dangerous.if he does nt know some thing then he is better off not writing things he does not know about

No question about it, the listening is demanding, not only because of the writer's rhetorical style but also because of the assumption that the reader knows the Old Testament and the wilderness life of Israel, a life centered in the tabernacle and the daily ministrations of the priest.

I so enjoyed my chat with Chris Dikes about writing — as most writers know, it's a rare pleasure to talk with a sympathetic someone about our work.

There are a lot of factors that show up and I don't know about you but if I had to read one more article that talks about how a writer had taken three months off in a cabin in the woods or how they required zero interruptions or had a solitary fellowship or months in a monastery, I was ready to cry.

Almost all the writers I know are neurotic in some way about their writing.

When the Bible refers to God darkening the moon, or not allowing it's light to shine, it's likely talking about infrequent lunar eclipses, and the same system of finding meaning in the position of planets relative to constellations we know as astrology is what these Bible writers are talking about.

All of us who know, however underwhelmingly, the call to prophetic leadership, lay or ordained, are very well aware of what this seminarian is talking about; and in this sense there is, I am afraid, something almost inescapably deceiving in the stance of the preacher / Iecturer / writer — at least this one.

At a recent gathering hosted by The Samuel Bronfman Foundation, which asked precisely that question, just about the only thing the group of leading Jewish scholars, writers, rabbis, and professors could agree on was that there is no longer one story, narrative, or idea that could hold the totality or even a majority of Jews together.

Instinctively we know that our best preaching comes about when we have discovered the ways in which the biblical writers sought to change minds, hearts, and lives and then have taken those «available means of persuasion» with us into the pulpit.

It just seems to me that as a writer / researcher who clearly knows better, it is really your job to attack, debunk and tear these assinine arguments about Obama's religious convictions to pieces rather than giving them some kind of legitimacy.

Earlier, nothing was known about it except the fact that it was used by several heretical groups such as the Naassenes; some church writers denounced it but did not describe it.

Science may tell us much that the biblical writers did not know about the processes by which God continually fashions an unfinished world, but it can not go beyond the great truth stated in Genesis 1:1, «In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.»

Those who wrote them, being believers, theologians, and preachers themselves, were seeking to make God and godliness known to their original envisaged audience, and the first question to be asked about each book has to do with what its writer saw it as saying and showing about God himself.

They are nationally known public figures (Christian leaders / bloggers / writers / authors / speakers)-- Tony Jones, Doug Pagitt, Brian McLaren — and we can discuss ANYTHING about them under the First Amendment.

No a «Christian» is someone who as the writer said, is passionate about Jesus yes, is intellectually engaged for Jesus sure, but far more importantly a Christian is someone who has a relationship with Jesus Christ, our Lord and God!

One more reason we need to know about religion is so that CNN can create controversy from it and keep people watching commercials and clicking on ads (which pay for the writers who create the controversy, thus keeping the unemployment rate down).

Fanny Crosby one of the most prolific hymn writers was blind, yet in my opinion she knew more about sight than many people.

Obviously Jesus and the writers of Scripture treat some sins as more severe than others (see pp. 5 — 8 of this article), even though Eichenwald mocks anyone who thinks this as showing «that they know next to nothing about the New Testament.»

CNN please be sure and let us know, (and assign a writer to an article about), when they take out their trash, and brush their teeth.

A writer actually talked about the Church needing to reach outside its four walls to make it's PRODUCT known, and that Churches have to work on their... wait for it... BRANDING!

The writer of this article obviously does not know what he is talking about.

It's sad when the author of this story makes it sound like she knows what she is talking about and the unknowing person believes that the writer is correct.

I am reasonably certain about this claim because I knew the Hollywood writers in the Communist party and several of those blacklisted, and I was by far the youngest.

The writer said that his spiritual journey made a huge turn when big questions about the NT (specifically Paul's theology) started emerging, especially in light of the fact that Paul started his series of letters (to the Galatians) with words very similar to what many ignorant Christians (Jeremy's term) use today: «I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preach is not something that man made up.

No different from the fact that while we know disasters surely happened in the ancient world, we don't see a lot of ancient writers talking about them.

So is Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know about what real Jesus was, please read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...

Responding to this reality, and getting real about priorities, Msgr. Joseph Champlin, well - known writer and lecturer, told the diocesan paper of St. Cloud, Minn., «The big question is not about the ordination of women or married clergy or the decline in clergy or pedophilia or abortion or assisted suicide.

Knowing the original languages, keeping the passage in its context, knowing something about the writer and what that person was attempting to communicate to their original audience and why, and who the orignal audinece was (and their cultural context and time) and how they might / probably would have understood the message would be a good startingKnowing the original languages, keeping the passage in its context, knowing something about the writer and what that person was attempting to communicate to their original audience and why, and who the orignal audinece was (and their cultural context and time) and how they might / probably would have understood the message would be a good startingknowing something about the writer and what that person was attempting to communicate to their original audience and why, and who the orignal audinece was (and their cultural context and time) and how they might / probably would have understood the message would be a good starting point.