Sentences with phrase «writes more books about»

They look at Twilight and think vampires are «in,» so they write more books about vampires.

Not exact matches

As YouTube star Mamrie Hart — her popular channel You Deserve a Drink has more than 1.2 million subscribers — set about writing her second book, which some could argue is an even scarier prospect than writing your first, her M.O. was to seek out adventure.

As an author, I know that with every book I write I learn more about myself, both my strengths and my weaknesses.

In my book with Travis Wright, Digital Sense, we wrote at length about how any business can easily architect their software solutions to more effectively deliver on customer experience and growth — and talked about it at CES earlier this month:

He has written three more books about eating and helped established «foodyism» as both a social marker and a political movement.

So much so that he has written about it: his new book X: The Experience of Business Meets Design explores the various ways companies can design better experiences in a way that's more meaningful for customers.

I wish Kerry would write a short book to be given to all who are about to lose a loved one, maybe, for those who never showed love or understanding, it just might change them, hopefully, and make them a different person with much more understanding.

DO NOT think that claims about science and the natural world are more likely true because they are written in new books.

(I wrote more about this in my review of Mark Noll's fascinating book, «The Civil War as a Theological Crisis.»)

ANYONE who has taken the time to actually STUDY the book and the God who wrote it has found that there is more than popular opinion to be said about it's sacred scripts.

I will also be writing a lot more about this in the future — especially the wrath of God and the book of Revelation.

As he wrote earlier in this chapter, any use of the test as «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the other dimensions of narrative explored later in the book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction than a deepened symbolic understanding.

I dare say, that if someone other than the Pope had written such a book, it would not have gotten the same amount of publicity and more people would have remained in the dark about this.

I write a lot more about this in my book, What is Prayer?

They just hate Christians that belive it is anything more than a book written by men about an imaginary ghost creature.

I wrote a lot more about this in my forthcoming book, Close Your Church for Good, and so I won't say anything more about this point here.

Having attended McCourt's reading, I can only conclude that the critical reception of Angela's Ashes says more about the expectations of «serious» Irish writing than about the book itself.

Mike Glenn has written a book which turns our view of God on its head, and tells us that God is more about saying «Yes» to us and our dreams, than about saying «No.»

Anyway, the book was fun to write, and I am learning more about publishing every day.

If / when an author in the group becomes published, he / she promises to help other members in the group also get published, and in return, they promise to write about and review the author's book so they can sell more copies.

I remembered Brennan Manning — the man who has translated the love of God in a way that I could receive it more than probably any other writer — was addicted to alcohol and I re-read up one of his last books before he died: «All is Grace: A Ragamuffin Memoir» where he vulnerably writes about what this battle has cost him, even as he experienced the unending and unconditional love of God in the midst of it, how he experienced regret and pain and loss alongside of the love and tenderness of God in this dependency.

P.S. I wrote an entire chapter in my latest book about the evangelical hero complex and our complicated relationship with our mutual callings and vocations and regular work, if you'd like to read more about this very thing.

Rather than being excited about some new insight from Scripture or idea about theology which I get to pass on to others, my writing has become more about pageviews, backlinks, ad revenue, email subscriber stats, book sales, and comment counts.

It is now a commonplace that he probably wrote more on the ontological argument than any other philosopher — a book, a substantial part of two others, and about twenty articles, replies, reviews, and forewords.

Others may feel like the schoolgirl who was assigned to write a review of a book on penguins, and did it in one sentence: «This book tells me more about penguins than I really wanted to know.»

This idea is guiding a lot of my life right now (and, yes, of course, I'm talking about way more than just writing a book):

When Jason Boyett and I realized we had both written memoir - style books about our experiences with doubt to be published byZondervan in the spring / summer of 2010, we decided to team up rather than compete — an arrangement that has probably worked more in my favor than his, seeing as Jason's already published a shelf - full of books and has earned a reputation for being one of the industry's most thoughtful and humorous voices.

So is Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know about what real Jesus was, please read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...

I write about it more in my book «The Atonement of God» but the bottom line is that the violent portions of the Bible reveals to us what WE are like, NOT what God is like.

My only real complaint with this book is the complaint I have with all such books: it seems as if 50 % or more of the book is devoted to telling stories about whatever the author is writing about.

(I wrote more about that in my book.)

(I write more about this in my forthcoming book, Cruciform Pastoral Leadership.)

What made you want to write another one?They say there have been more books written about Martin Luther...

Anyway, I will write a lot more about this when I get to the subject of hell in the current book I am writing on the violence of God, but I wanted to just give a short preview of my views on hell, and provide a follow - up from the post yesterday about whether Jesus spoke of hell more than heaven.

DO NOT think that claims about magic and the supernatural are more likely true because they are written in old books.

(I have written more fully about them in a book published in 1981, Faith's New Age.)

More books written about Him More music written for Him More colleges named for Him More hospitals named for Him

I agree somewhat... mere claims to posess an «authoritive written record» prove nothing about the documents either way, for or against.But that's not really the itch I was trying to get at.Let me try to be more direct... With respect to the original post, I've been wrestling with how believers / disciples / adherents use «their books» to undergird and support their particular faith

(You can read more about this journey in the book Henry and I wrote.)

(I've written more about this in my forthcoming book.)

But each time I read books, blogs or articles about the topic (granted that I am more inclined to read stuff written by people who are really serious about their relationship with God rather than people complaining merely because they can — and thereâ $ ™ s plenty of them), I come to one conclusion: The complaints are mostly about what the church has become (or how people perceive the church to be) than against the church itself.

... wow, lot's of mis - statements here by people speculating about the Bible and Jesus, including those of you who think the books of the Bible were written a few hundred years ago (Moses penned it around 1400BC)... the Bible is a collection of the most investigated writings of all time, so there is a tremendous amount of credible archeological and scientific material in this world available for review rooted in verifiable investigations... my response, read the Bible, do your own investigation, determine the Truth for yourself... hopefully, anne rice's denouncement of faith in the God of the Bible (it's difficult for me to believe she ever had Saving Faith in the first place) will bring some readers to investigate and find the Truth... God will call the Elect, not one more, not one less...

Why don't you spend some more time dreaming up all the possible combinations, and then write a book about it?

What I think is really important for me about the book is, I wrote it as if I were dying, and I finished the manuscript, and then they told me I had cancer and that it expanded further than they'd hoped and that it was more advanced than we would want, and I didn't know if it was going to be my last Christmas.

A real Christian would go out and help all these people and be humble about it, not broadcast it on TV and write more books.

In a letter to a friend at Zwickau, Luther wrote about Eck's text in desperate apocalyptic mood: «The book... is nothing less than the malice and envy of a maniac... Rejoice, Brother, rejoice, and be not terrified by these whirling leaves... The more they rage the more cause I give them...»

But it was also the case that, as Alter moved from making brilliant observations about a small selection of texts to writing large commentaries on entire biblical books, the weaknesses of his scholarship became more visible.

Few critics would seem more qualified to write about contemporary art than Eleanor Heartney, and her latest book, with cover endorsements from Arthur Danto and Andrew Greeley, has the look of an important contribution.

On more than one occasion I've been told that because I am not a mother, I am not qualified to write a book about womanhood.

Several years ago we wrote a blog post (and a chapter in our travel book) about traveling with kids and we're thinking about writing an updated version with more guidelines and tips that we've picked up as our crew has grown.