Sentences with phrase «writing about any form»

With this novel, you join a tradition of depicting slavery in an open and unflinching way, though you've written about a form of it perhaps less known to most readers: urban slavery.

Not exact matches

I've written about it ad nauseam before — in the form of grocery pick - up systems, healthy eating subscriptions, and meal prep services — but I really hate grocery shopping.
In line with the study about stressful jobs, other research demonstrates that similar forms of expressive writing (writing out your thoughts and feelings like in a diary) helps those coping with stressful situations such as unemployment.
Originally, Facebook Notes were simple white pages for writing some users occasionally used to write a long - form post about a memory, experience, or opinion, among other things, and it appeared in a special section on their profiles.
A «powder keg is forming in the installed base» of iPhone customers, Arcuri argues: Currently, the portion of existing iPhone customers who might be expected to upgrade into iPhone 7 is about 33 percent, a number that has been consistent for the last six quarters, Arcuri writes.
Could incorporating more long - form writing into your work routine provide similar clarity about how well you understand your business?
It could take the form of a letter to yourself, written from five years in the future, describing all you've accomplished and how it came about.
The gene - silencing strategy, in the form of RNA interference, has also showed promise against an uncommon neurodegenerative disease called hereditary ATTR amyloidosis, as my colleague Sy Mukherjee wrote about in Fortune's year - end Investor's Guide.
He was part of a New York City dinner circuit that includes people who believe the US should go back to the gold standard, rich people who don't think they should have to give back to society in the form of taxes, and anyone interested in either of those ideas who wanted to write a book about them.
Baker is excited about the airline industry overall, writing that «cost convergence, fare unbundling, widespread consolidation, diminished new entrant activity, and return - oriented management teams have combined to form an industry that is actually managing itself for the first time we can recall.»
Recently, when I wrote about how email as we know it will become obsolete by 2020, several readers took issue with the prediction, arguing that email might change but we will still rely on it as a primary form of digital communication.
Action: Write to your political reps to demand stronger privacy laws Who is this for: Anyone who cares about privacy, and especially Internet users in North America right now How difficult is it: A bit of effort Tell me more: There appears to be bipartisan appetite among U.S. lawmakers to bring in some form of regulation for Internet companies.
Dr. Misner has written extensively about the unique form of marketing created through word of mouth referrals and Morgan brings an extensive background in psychology and organizational development to the intricate discussion of human success.
Steve: Morgan Housel, we had on the podcast, wrote this really good post about bubbles and how they form, and the momentum behind them.
If you love to write and have a message about life you want to share for others, then blogging might be a great form of eventually - passive income for you.
Bubbles form when emotions override logic, and based on the attitudes around these stocks (and the vitriol I received in the comments when I wrote about them) emotions are the driving force behind their lofty valuations.
Taking a association or individual's word on their firmness formed on what they write about themselves on paper is not a arguable way to establish the ethics of their actual practices, though.
There's nothing much to write about in the «news» end of this coin part form WinQ shall continue its test on the NEO blockchain.
Elsewhere are the lyrics Jimi Hendrix wrote for the song «Machine Gun,» in their original form on hotel room stationary, and a letter that the FBI's Hoover wrote to former President Gerald Ford while Ford was still just a Michigan congressman, ranting about the MC5 while calling them «the house band of the radical White Panther Party» and complaining that music was fueling the decade's radical politics.
Drew Dixon writes about how video games waste the power of violence and how it can be better used as an art form.
«Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin.»
Much ink has been spilled about what Luke means when he writes that the Spirit descended in bodily form, and whether or not He came he came in the appearance of a dove, or just in the same manner as a dove.
♦ Richard Vigilante is writing in National Review about the changing forms of liberalism and conservatism, and the last line makes this one worth citing: «The future of conservatism seems to lie in a concern for the state not of the deficit, or of the defense budget, but of the culture.»
One of the faithful contributors to this blog in the form of comments, Chris Gill, wrote me a personal email yesterday in response to my post about Sarah and I gathering up her boyfriend's belongings last week.
Chesterton's feelings about Russian anti-Semitism were reflected in a series of pieces published during 1891 (written in the form of fictional Letters) in The Debater, the school magazine of which he was co-founder and a prolific contributor:
«Although some notable New Testament scholars affirm traditional Johannine scholarship, the majority do not believe that John or one of the Apostles wrote it, and trace it instead to a «Johannine community» which traced its traditions to John; the gospel itself shows signs of having been composed in three «layers», reaching its final form about 90 - 100 AD.»
REGARDLESS OF AUTHORSHIP (last week's debate), it is factually demonstrable that the FINAL FORM of the NT considers the God of the OT to be the VERY SAME God it is writing about (against Dr Baden's claim).
The idea of this series of «Letters To Dad» is that I write about twenty stories about homeless and runaway youth / teens in the form of letters to their dads, letters that briefly tell their stories, stories from a variety of kids who have a variety of reasons for being homeless.
The primary form of intellectual ENGAGEMENT is through reading, and the second through talking about and writing about what you've read.
If I can recall, basically everything we know about History either comes from books, artwork, or in some other written form.
There is nothing new about the letter form, and in the days of the New Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's name.
I wanted to tell of the ways that my family and community have formed my theology, I wanted to write a love letter to my complex feelings about church and community, marriage and mothering, womanhood and sisterhood — and I wanted to tell our story.
Luke had been at pains to make clear that the risen Jesus was no otherworldly spirit but a physical form with flesh and bones, 42 who consequently presented his disciples with infallible proofs.41 The risen Christ came to be regarded as having conducted a fresh ministry with his disciples, and in these forty days he «taught them about the kingdom of God».41 But since the experience of the risen Christ was not of this character at the end of the century when Acts was written, it had to be made clear that this kind of experience was brought to an end by a new event, the Ascension.
The only solution to the problem of evil «worth writing home about» is one in which human freedom is not only affirmed but is also «a special, intensified, magnified form of a general principle pervasive of reality, down to the very atoms and still farther.
How can you write a story about Christianity without even bothering to mention even a few of the BASIC doctrinal concepts that form the very foundation of Christianity??
One of these two books was written by Father Ricci and was about the Existence of God, and the second one by another community formed in Seoul and in the country essentially among the literate.
During the year following the death of the Prophet no one worried about the written form because there were innumerable oral witnesses among them as living copies of the Qur» an complete in its final form.
Genesis was written in its current form by Moses likely though about 5 eyewitness accounts.
Genesis was written in its current form by Moses likely though about 5 eyewitness accounts ---- So, God created 5 human beings before he created them a world to live in?
Well — same thing can be said for all the generations of folk who wrote down all the words from which you derived you've formed your own theories about «in the beginning»...
CS Lewis and JRR Tolkien frequently discussed the issue of time during their years of friendship, and both wrote about their view of time in their books, usually in the form of stories.
In this book, CS Lewis mixes autobiography with the religious / philosophical history of Western culture, and writes about it in the form of John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress.
In other words, Thomas, though perhaps written in final form about mid-second century or shortly thereafter, may preserve an independent tradition of sayings more reliable in some cases than those found in Matthew, Mark and Luke.
Paul van Buren was a disciple of Karl Barth, under whom he wrote his excellent doctoral dissertation on Calvin's teaching about Christ as the true life of men; Hamilton was an opponent of natural theology in all its forms, even if he studied at St Andrews under Donald Baillie — but it was the so - called «rico - orthodox» line which had attracted him, theologically; Altizer is a slightly different case.
Actually, this is a sound principle — and encouraging to those of us who write or teach about literary and paraliterary forms.
Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..
It is not surprising that the man who wrote a pseudo-review about a nonexistent book, a man who spent three years writing a biweekly on foreign books and authors, should write «Pierre Menard,» a story (composed in the form of an obituary) whose narrator is the reviewer of a nonexistent author's life works.
Indeed, as Ford himself admits, the concept of God as the conceptual valuation of eternal objects was already present in Religion in the Making, Whitehead's previous book.36 There Whitehead wrote about God that» [t] his ideal world of conceptual harmonization is merely a description of God himself,» then added that «the nature of God is the complete conceptual realization of the realm of ideal forms» (154).
To those who would find such conceptual wavering unlikely; Ford's answer is that Whitehead never actually abandoned the concept of God as formative element in Religion in the Making, the fourth and last part of that book, where Whitehead writes about God as the conceptual valuation of the realm of ideal forms, is nothing else than the result of «a theistic projection based on the revelation of Western religions» («Growth» 11).
So I said, somewhat dubiously, because this was a secular lecture to a general audience and I was afraid of being misunderstood, that my point of view about life was going to show under the story, because that's inevitable, but I never consciously write about moral precepts, and I do not like moralism, which is another form of do - it - yourselfism.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z