I'll be
writing about my nature hunts and what I find.
I'll be
writing about my nature hunts and what I find.
I'll be
writing about my nature hunts and what I find.
H is for Hawk is by historian and naturalist Helen MacDonald (who, by the way, begins
writing about nature for the New York Times Magazine any minute now), and while I knew I'd like this book, I had no idea I'd love it so much.
I am the mama of two boys (ages 7 and 4), and
I write about nature, mindfulness, unschooling, consensual parenting... in short: life, love, and trust.
Many have
written about the nature of programs in teacher education: too varied, too theoretical, too much reliance on craft knowledge rather than based on elements of research, too little research on the effects of teacher preparation programs, a lack of attention to determining their effects on student achievement, and so on.
As left - wing writer Doug Henwood clearly
wrote about the nature of the Democrats:
Meanwhile, some of the essays he has
written about nature for the Seattle Times were collected to create Natural Grace (2003).
Rob Marks
writes about the nature of the aesthetic experience and its effect on self and society.
In addition to performing general editorial duties, David
writes about nature, produces slideshows, and serves as TreeHugger's books editor.
However this view is based on a lack of knowledge of what Marx actually
wrote about the nature of the modern state which was: «The executive of the modern state is nothing but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie» Some leftists may well scream in exactly the same way as the new rightists, that carbon taxes are part of a plot by the wicked capitalists to make the poor freeze in winter.
However this view is based on a lack of knowledge of what Marx actually
wrote about the nature of the modern state which was:
Not exact matches
In April 2017, Barclays announced UK regulators were investigating Staley and the bank after the executive attempted to discover who
wrote a letter that «raised concerns of a personal
nature»
about a senior employee.
The move is part of the sweeping trend that is shaking the center aisles of the supermarket, as my esteemed colleague Beth Kowitt has
written about so thoughtfully in the pages of Fortune: a migration away from processed foods to those that are simpler and less removed from
nature.
John Mauldin: The author of Thoughts from The Frontline who has dedicated more than 30 years of his life to keeping people informed
about risk, John has
written at length
about the fragmentation of society and the changing
nature of employment.
I turn to writer Flannery O'Connor, who, though she never
wrote stories
about the consecrated or even ostensibly Catholic life, had a great deal to say concerning the intersection of invisible and visible, of grace and
nature.
Much environmental
writing is marked by a treacly sentimentality
about nature, often combined, oddly enough, with a venomous contempt for the part of
nature that is humanity.
Nature, then, has been presented as «the servant of history» or the «stage for history» in much modern
writing about biblical theology.
Reviewing a book titled The Son of Man
written by François Mauriac (a French Roman Catholic who
wrote about the problems of good and evil in human
nature and in the world), Flannery O'Connor
writes: He proposes in the place of that anguish that Gide called the Catholic's «cramp....
Anyway, when I
write about the non-violent character and
nature of God, I often get accused of «cherry - picking» the Bible.
Part of the reason I
wrote the book was so in the culture, we could have a conversation
about this, a substantive, civil, sober conversation on the meaning of life and the
nature of reality.
We, and our students, have
written not only
about God but also
about the problem of evil, Christ, the church, Christian education, pastoral counseling, preaching, the
nature of human beings, history, liberation and salvation, spirituality, religious diversity, interfaith dialogue, science and religion, and other standard theological topics.
The gospel was first of all an oral gospel and was essentially an eschatological proclamation
about the
nature of the end of the world, spoken in Aramaic and later
written in Greek.
In fact, theologians who
write about ecological concerns are united in their opinion that a holistic view of reality is basic to a responsible relation between humans and
nature.
At
about the same time (ca. 1304 - 1307) Dante also completed the first four books of what was to have been a fifteen - book encyclopedic treatise,
written in the vernacular, on the
nature of philosophizing.
One would hardly expect a discussion either of the life or of the significance of Jesus of Nazareth in such philosophically oriented studies of
nature and history, or even in what little
about human
nature they have
written.
As I have
written before, words reveal truths
about who we are in
nature and in grace, and as such, we believe a falsehood
about our
nature when we embrace a gay identity, or when we believe that anyone has an «orientation» toward the same sex.
sasss... Now you're just being disingenuous... Darwin did
write about the «lesser evolved»
nature of black people.
Jake Luhrs
writes about the short - term
nature of our addictions as opposed to the long - term desires of our spirit.
Between 1933 and 1936 Collingwood
wrote in the manuscripts «Notes Towards a Metaphysics,» «The
Nature of Metaphysical Study,» «Method and Metaphysics,» and «Realism and Idealism,» that metaphysics was an attempt to find out what we can about the general nature of re
Nature of Metaphysical Study,» «Method and Metaphysics,» and «Realism and Idealism,» that metaphysics was an attempt to find out what we can
about the general
nature of re
nature of reality.
But
writing and reading
about the
nature of the faith can never take the place of the life of faith itself.
When Dorothee Sölle
wrote in 1971 of the indivisible salvation of the whole world, she and her readers assumed without reflection that the whole world is the world of human beings.1 But as the seventies progressed and the environmental crisis forced itself on public attention, more and more Christians became troubled
about the separation of humanity from the rest of
nature.
He
writes that Whitehead's statement
about value shows that he attributes «interiority» to events in
nature (EWM 42).
As with everything Dr. Enns
writes, this book was full of deep insights and helpful ideas
about the
nature and authority of Scripture.
However, by the time he delivered his Gifford lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1927 and 1928, upon which Process and Reality was based, Whitehead was already aware of insurmountable difficulties with many empiricist assumptions
about the
nature of the reality that we are supposed to observe in order to confirm those general laws of which Cohen
wrote.
The spirit in which he went
about that work, the results of which have put the world eternally in his debt, is fairly indicated by a memorandum
written in his early forties and never intended for publicity: «Believing that I was born for the service of mankind, and regarding the care of the commonwealth as a kind of common property, which, like the air and the water, belongs to everybody, I set myself to consider in what way mankind might best be served, and what service I was myself best fitted by
nature to perform.»
In Compelled By Love we
wrote, «But do not be fooled: This is a story
about the very
nature of God and the heart of His church.
The programs taught me
about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another:
nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4)
write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.
J.H.Nichols
wrote, «The faith and order movement has sometimes tended to proceed as if one could deal with the abstract essence of the one Church, could argue
about and perhaps determine the true
nature, without what it does».29 However, the Lund conference gave consideration to the world mission of the church and its relation to unity.
However, with one exception (the feminist Mud Flower Collective's God's Fierce Whimsy, discussed in Chapter 4), book - length essays
about the
nature and purpose of theological education
written from any of their perspectives have not yet been published.
These can be as simple as the Scandinavian belief in vaettir (
nature spirits) or as complex as the poems and songs
about the Aesi that were
written and are still sung and performed in Iceland.
John Howard Yoder
wrote about the exemplary
nature of Israel's posture with regard to imperial power (and he
wrote with explicit sympathy for Messianic Judaism).
He
wrote, «I can not understand what meaning can be assigned to the distance of the sun from Sirius if the very
nature of space depends upon causal intervening objects which we know nothing
about» (R 58).
In terms of such process thinking (
about which I have
written in Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential
nature — but that essential
nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in it.
Most religious
writing about the environment, whether from traditional and mainstream religions or from some new consciousness, tends to treat
nature as a steady «state paradise, a self «regulating harmony where balances temporarily upset are smoothly restored.
At the time when Whitehead was
writing The Concept of
Nature, and also when he was thinking
about the theory of Relativity, it was still possible to adhere to a Special Relativist view of the Universe.
Jeff: This is what causes division as we go
about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal
nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is
written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..
Indeed, as Ford himself admits, the concept of God as the conceptual valuation of eternal objects was already present in Religion in the Making, Whitehead's previous book.36 There Whitehead
wrote about God that» [t] his ideal world of conceptual harmonization is merely a description of God himself,» then added that «the
nature of God is the complete conceptual realization of the realm of ideal forms» (154).
It is for this reason, and not because I implicitly accept the process notion of non-logical metaphysical principles, that I
write about the relation between God and
nature in the way I do.
defining moment came in the late 1970s and early 1980s when what Boyagoda calls the «two - track»
nature of Richard's
writing about religion and politics hitched a ride on the zeitgeist.