Sentences with phrase «writing after the fact»

Oh thats right it was all written after the fact according you your facts.

Most scholars now believe that this speech was actually written after the fact by an aide to an American general.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

It was not like there was a recording made or a journal kept by any one — it was all written after the fact.

While it's a good rule of thumb to follow the interviewer's lead on how formal to act while in the interview, always keep it professional when writing after the fact.

Not exact matches

While much is written about this after the fact, less is penned about the steps taken to get there.

In fact, after a short - lived marriage, Rolwing found herself jobless and penniless, writing Harry Potter on napkins at various cafes in Edinburgh, Scotland with her daughter Jessica by her side.

What is interesting here is not simply that the everyday language of «a fine day» is determined by a set of new - fangled scientific abstractions, but also the fact that a novel written after the war dares to inhabit the virtual outlook of before.

After users label a story as questionable and fact checkers dispute the story and flag it, «You'll still be able to read and share the story, but you'll now have more information about whether fact checkers believe it's accurate,» the CEO wrote.

But good writing — online or off — involves much more than fixing typos or tweaking awkward phrases after the fact.

«In the case of action taken by written consent, [shareholders are entitled] to receive prompt notice after the fact of the action taken,» the judge wrote.

«In fact, going back more than 100 years, the Dow has been down 0.3 % on average during the first six months after a new Fed chair takes office,» Lynch and Detrick wrote in a note this week.

As the fact - checking site Snopes wrote in 2016, the illegitimate child story was a resurfacing of a 1992 story that had disappeared after it was reported that a DNA test failed to establish Clinton as Williams» father.

«The nightmare scenario would be a categorical classification from the SEC that all tokens are, in fact, securities,» long - time crypto startup entrepreneur Ryan Selkis wrote on the Messari blog recently, after news came out that major investors had met with the SEC about this new industry.

About 2 years ago I wrote a post about fake accounts on social media where I addressed this concept of accounts following you on Instagram and Twitter and, if you decide to hook up with them, instantly dropping you after the fact.

After a ten year bull market, we have gone 180 degrees with pundits and the media which are now more prone to talk and write bullishly, sometimes manipulating the facts to fit their views.

They're all different, they're contradictory, and they were written by Gentiles who had already internalized Paul's views of Jesus — years after the fact.

The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».

Also, we know its a historical fact that no part of the New Testament was actually written by anyone who ever met Jesus or witnessed the events first hand; much of the New Testament was written 200 years after the death of Jesus.

We are nearly 2000 years out from the New Testament — nearly as so much of the NT was written SO long after the fact — and society has continued to change.

«sensible Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

Considering that these stories were written 80 - 100 years after the fact.

Beyond that simple fact, recognition of the totalitarian syndrome of the communist system did not take place during the wartime period when the book was being written; such recognition came about after the Second World War was long over.

Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

The very fact that his birth happened after the alleged Jesus and wrote the Annals during the formation of Christianity, shows that his writing can only provide us with hearsay accounts.

its really easy to get prophecy right when the bible was written hundreds of years AFTER the fact

In fact the new testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written yet.

So the bible stories are just that, stories written half a century after the fact and no without any other secular history to back it up.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

During his trial or after it, three years or three days from this writing, new facts may emerge that demonstrate to me and all the world that George Cardinal Pell of Australia is guilty as sin.

When a writer repeatedly proclaims that he has left faith behind in childhood» in fact, never had it» and then proceeds to write book after book in which a crisis of faith plays a central role, we may reasonably wonder if he is not engaged in his own evasive maneuvers, conscious of a pursuer at his heels.

The bible says what I want it to say and the fact that the bible is still «relevant» twenty - five hundred years after it was written, shows humanities inability to evolve.

My distinct impression, in fact, is that mainline Protestant clergy and denominational leaders were the main audience for whom Wuthnow wrote After the Boomers.

Although many have disputed the authenticity of Tacitus» mention of Jesus, the very fact that his birth happened after the alleged Jesus and wrote the Annals during the formation of Christianity, shows that his writing can only provide us with Hearsay Accounts.

Nobody saw the evengelists writing their accounts of the bible — It is impossible to prove who wrote it 2000 years after the fact — But what we do have is faith, for this no proof is needed.

that's true of myths — which are normally written 100s of years after the fact, with virtually no access to the historical reality itself.

In fact, the first full - length book he wrote after his conversion in 1845 was the 1850 work Lectures on Certain Difficulties Felt by Anglicans in Submitting to the Catholic Church (also available in the abbreviated title Anglican Difficulties).

In fact the majority of the books were written hundreds if not thousands of years after Jesus died.

But, even if written by Josephus in 94ad that is still some 60 years after the fact, when all the principals players have long since died and all that's left is stories.

legends come LONG after the facts... as in the days of the Bible times... the Gospels do NOT show evidence of LEGENDS being formed as they were written soon after the events..

H.S. the problem with people as gullible as you is you don't bother researching to know that your jesus didn't write anything, the fact it was written 50 — 100 years after he died makes it hearsay and not the truth.

You're using a book that is not factual, has no proof other than itself, and was written by men 100's of years after the fact.

The Jews are still looking for the coming of Christ; in fact, He might have come any time after these prophecies were written up to the present time, or even on into the future.

Allison — the books of the New Testament WERE in fact written by the apostles, most written about 30 years after the death of Christ.

In fact, it was written during the 6th - century BCE, about 100 - 200 years after the original author of the Book of Isaiah died.

They were written hundreds of years after the «fact» and were used to control the people of that time.

If I remember correctly: four historians make note of him, but one of those accounts was proven a forgery written nearly 1000 years after the fact.

In fact, documents that John Paul II wrote for the millennium continue to guide the Catholic Church years after his death, the cardinal says.

They seem to think that a translation of the Bible written over a thousand years after the fact, and hundreds of years before today, somehow accurately transmits the original message.

Even though these people will live extremely short lives, I will punish them for eternity if they don't do what I say (or really what some of them really late in the game, like a million years after they've been around, write down in a book) or in fact, even if they just don't believe in me.