Sentences with phrase «writing against the year»

Editable diary writing frames, lesson plans, assessment grids written against year 3 expectations:) Miss Ritchie x

Used to encourage independent assessment of writing against the Year 2 objectives.

Not exact matches

TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IF YOU OR WE WANT TO ASSERT A SECTION 27 DISPUTE AGAINST THE OTHER, THEN YOU OR WE MUST COMMENCE IT (BY DELIVERY OF WRITTEN NOTICE AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 27 (a) WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER DISCOVERY OF THE SECTION 27 DISPUTE ARISES - OR IT WILL BE FOREVER BARRED.

But «there is no evidence that Pershing himself» used pigs as a tactic against Muslim insurgents, Politifact wrote last year.

The article, written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, gave a detailed account of an alleged 2012 gang rape that a woman identified as «Jackie» said had endured at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house as a first - year student, and accused the university of tolerating a culture that ignored sexual violence against women.

The gene - silencing strategy, in the form of RNA interference, has also showed promise against an uncommon neurodegenerative disease called hereditary ATTR amyloidosis, as my colleague Sy Mukherjee wrote about in Fortune's year - end Investor's Guide.

«We understand the sentiment, but our members have stuck by us over the last year against others» predictions,» Cheryl Kim, Aimia's vice-president corporate reputation and public affairs, wrote in an email.

As Nicholas Colas of ConvergEx wrote in a Friday note, «Against measures of long - term earnings power, the S&P 500 is clearly expensive at 25 (times) trailing 10 - year earnings.

I think you wrote to your shareholders last year it's been a mistake to bet against the United States for the last 240 years.

«After years of military modernization, China shows the ability to wage war against Taiwan for the first time since the 1950s,» the GOP senators wrote in a letter.

«She is pleased that the Tribunal recognized that the Respondents discriminated against her and violated the Human Rights Code when they terminated her after 10 years of loyal service because she had a disability,» Alexander Sinclair wrote.

«Nobody else has come forward in 25 years with a fresh accusation of assault against him,» Stephens wrote.

Can't believe they allow people to make laws against a minority group based on some book that was written by men thousands of years ago (and revised countless times).

Atheists are not out protesting against equal rights or basing equal rights off of a book written 2000 years ago.

against, amazingly enough, whatever interpretations of translations of made up rules some guy wrote down thousands of years ago.

Nic Sheff, an editor and writer for 13 Reasons Why, has defended the show's intensely graphic depiction of suicide: «Facing these issues head - on — talking about them, being open about them — will always be our best defense against losing another life,» he wrote in Vanity Fair last year.

I didn't write about Commenders with this current situation in mind, but because I have generally been seeing an increased level of push - back against them from the spiritual abuse survivor community over the past five years.

jerry... take a look at the whole situation from step one... I just addressed it on today's cartoon site... David wrote a thank you to his commenters... Andrew comes in out of left field railing against David... that was the first comment... others tried to wish David happy new year etc. and Andrew comes back in with more junk.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

(This is hardly surprising when one realizes that Whitehead's essay was written in the same year that Einstein struck the first major blow against the classical Newtonian - Euclidian world view with his paper on special relativity.)

In the prevailingly liberal churches for years now few books have been written, few sermons have been preached, few church - school classes have been taught in which sin as sin against God has been the central theme.

Two of these — «Flower of Purity» and «Gentle Guide of Youth» — are especially relevant to our current theme In the Novena he composed in preparation for the Feast of St Philip, Cardinal Newman wrote: «Philip, well knowing the pleasure God takes in cleanness of heart, had no sooner come to years of discretion, and to the power of distinguishing between good and evil, than he set himself to wage war against the evils and suggestions of his enemy, and never rested till he had gained the victory.

The crisis of catechesis in the Church during the last forty years or so, about which so much has been written in these pages, has made it very difficult for ordinary Catholics to articulate the true view of marriage against this error - strewn account.

Growing out of a series of books and essays Kekes has written over the last several years - on the nature of moral argument, the problem of evil, and the conflictual goods and evils that make up life as we know it - Against Liberalism marks the author's most explicit broadside against liberal theory tAgainst Liberalism marks the author's most explicit broadside against liberal theory tagainst liberal theory to date.

Years ago I wrote to several well known evangelical figures about why they didn't speak out against racism.

For example, one of the charges against Honest to God, almost as soon as it appeared, was that John Robinson had said nothing in that book about «future life» — although the critic must have forgotten that not many years before the bishop had written, while still a theological teacher, a treatise entitled In the End God which is a considered and very interesting and suggestive discussion of exactly that subject as well as of the related aspects of «the last things».

Against my usually - better - than - this judgement, I began to write online about my marriage a few years ago.

The most egregious allegations against Allen came in 2014, when Dylan Farrow wrote a first - person account for The New York Times saying Allen sexually abused her when she was 7 years old.

You should have realized by now, Austin, that my beef is rather: «Why does something written 1.5 thousand years ago causing crimes against humanity in Uganda today by way of many of its adherents?»

against his father's passionate entreaties, for he was heir of a princely house; and when a year later the father died, he took the loss as a «particular attention» to himself on God's part, and wrote letters of stilted good advice, as from a spiritual superior, to his grieving mother.

Strict teetotallers waging a war against drunkenness and teaching in the Sunday school», wrote Francis years later.

Best - selling author Dave Hunt wrote of the ECT statement: «I believe the document represents the most devastating blow against the gospel in at least one thousand years.»

Many ineffective churches, ministries, and Christians will still be writing and speaking against the «evils» of postmodernism for another 20 - 30 years.

Look gentlemen this WAS an extremely well written and well researched article and has to rank as one of the best Ive read in many a long year, Howvever when all of the «in depth analysis» has been done it really boils down to two points and two points only, 1) Our strikers (namely Walcott, Giroud, Welbeck and Cambel) just did nt score enough goals when it really mattered, 2) our defence made too many mistakes that allowed too many goals to be scored against us when it mattered.

the wilshere goal against norwich and that rosicky goal against «do nt know against whom anymore» but i think where our decisions differ is that i think that till the season 11/12, maybe 12/13 overachieved / had success, cause some year ago in the 12/13 season you wrote that he underachieved in this period, haha i still remember that xD but after that he should have won atleast one title and its a disappointment that we never had more than 80 points in the last few years..

Ahead of Arsenal's first - leg against AS Monaco, Redknapp wrote in The Sun: «The Gunners would be my dark horses for the Champions League because when you get a bit of luck like they have had, you start to think this could just be the year when your name is going to be scratched on the trophy.

All the pundits and - experts - have written Arsenal off in today's Caraboa Cup Final against Man City, but they did in last years FA cup semi-final against City and also in the Final against Chelsea, so the label of underdog doesn't worry the Arsenal players in the slightest.

The 31 - year - old veteran wrote on his Instagram account: «Excited about tomorrow's big match against Chelsea!

Writing on the club's website, long - serving midfielder Noble said: «Our last home game against Burnley was one of my toughest days in nearly 20 years at West Ham, and I never want to see scenes like that again.

Writing on the club's website on Tuesday, the long - serving midfielder said: «Our last home game against Burnley was one of my toughest days in nearly 20 years at West Ham, and I never want to see scenes like that again.

«They can't hurt us anymore,» I wrote after Dyche became the first Burnley manager to get a win against them in 35 years.

Well, that's because the Supreme Court doesn't much like it, determining more than 100 years ago that polygamy was «an offence against society» (Reynolds v. U.S.) and compared it to «murders sanctified by religious belief, such as human sacrifice or the burning of women on their husbands» funeral pyres,» or so writes lawyer and social critic Wendy Kaminer.

A year ago, I wrote a blog about how hospital bans against vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) limit options for Muskegon families.

In the couple of years since I wrote my own case against breast - feeding, I have gotten hundreds of emails from mothers in a similar panic looking for comfort.

One year later, in June 2017, they wrote McLaughlin a letter telling him that if he underwent the training and did not retaliate against the staff member, they would consider the matter resolved.

Frank Mauro, executive director emeritus of the Fiscal Policy Institute and a onetime secretary of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, argued against Proposal One, writing at the time that it would have made the state budget process «even more of a mess than it has been in many recent years.»

And a loan agreement that imposes structural adjustment against the wishes of the domestic political class (not to mention the people) is barely worth the paper it's written on, and is certainly a very poor predictor of what policy changes we'll actually see over the coming years.

He writes: «Up against tough competition, the whole story is the most loony accusation I've ever faced in 20 years in politics.

The Conservative MP, who has only rebelled against the party leadership once in 29 years, wrote that it was with «the deepest reluctance» he had concluded he must do so again.

«Council's decision to give Hon. Justice Esowe a serious warning and put her on its «Watch List» for one year, was sequel to a petition written against her by Mr. Jimmy Dirisu Aliu, alleging injustice for failing to deliver ruling in Suit No.