Sentences with phrase «writing an argument between»

Similarly to Pat Barker in her World War I novels, Magee's descriptions are stripped of metaphor and simile and her dialogue is crisp and vivid whether she is writing an argument between Katherina and her deluded parents or between Peter and his fellow soldiers freezing in the Russian snow.

Not exact matches

Vik writes: The ongoing argument about this being the new internet to the grandest pyramid scheme is perplexing and similar to the current debate between Elon vs. Zuck on AI.

John Eppstein, writing The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations between the World Wars, argues that proportionality and last resort are to be found in the arguments of the Neoscholastics, but the texts he cites do not clearly make the case.

The thrust of the cumulative argument of Cobb's book is that since Whitehead wrote statements that clearly imply that regional inclusion obtains between molecular and electronic occasions, we ought to be receptive to the suggestion that «soul» occasions include the regions of brain occasions and God includes the regions of all temporal occasions, because there is no principle involved in these latter two instances which has not been acknowledged by Whitehead himself in the case of the relations holding between molecular occasions and electronic occasions.

Because all of Scripture is culturally directed — i. e., because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the church.

The Israelites wrote as ancient people, and their argument for why Yahweh is above all the others gods (see, for example, Psalm 95) only worked because of the shared mythic categories between Israel and her neighbors.»

There was much writing and re-writing of the Instructions for the visitations, and Luther had to mediate when theological argument broke out between Agricola and Melancthon as to whether repentance came before faith, or vice versa.

«When the review into LIBOR is looked at, it will of course include this market [the oil market], and will aim to publish conclusions by the end of September... as a result of this debate, and the arguments from my Hon. Friend [Robert Halfon], I will also write to the FSA about concerns raised today... It is absolutely right that we enhance transparency in the oil and commodity markets... It is clear from the data that there is a considerable time - lag involved [between oil prices and petrol prices].

The lawyer argued in the third grounds that the CCT erred in law «when it abandoned the main purport of the recusal (disqualification) and ignored the submissions of counsel thereon only to begin to write a ruling comprised of facts and arguments that are only know to Justice Umar and not raised or introduced by any parties in order to arrive at a conclusion not urged upon him by any of the parties concerning the constitutional and statutory relationship between the AGF and the EFCC».

The Common Core writing standards call for students to focus on evidence - based writing — specifically argument and informative / explanatory texts in high school, with less time spent on writing «real or imagined» narratives (the elementary and middle school Standards (PDF) suggest that the split be roughly even between the three genres).

You need to know the ways of relationships between the thesis and arguments to be prepared to sequence them logically while writing your persuasive essay.

And it provides a lesson to all game designers caught between the two sides of an old argument: is it better for a game to be well - written and packed with snappy dialogue, or to provide gameplay mechanics that allow you to feel as though you're telling a story of your own?

The minigames are a little weak compared to the rest of the game, but then you remember that you helped settle an argument between spectral Edgar Allan Poe and spectral H.P. Lovecraft over who wrote the scariest stories of all time, which was further exacerbated by a spectral Enid Blyton.

(Note, I did write «There is no linkage between FF emissions & SO2 emissions «which is evidently not what the more detailed argument that sentence summated was presenting.

In your many lines — thankyou — i found the key argument how you can be convinced that the temperature only creates variation for a very short time: YOu write: «The net result is that a new equilibrium (at a higher CO2 level) is reached in relative short time, between a few months (seasons) to a few years (sustained higher average temperature level).»

A study published in the journal American Behavioral Scientist looked at 203 opinion articles written by 80 different US conservative columnists between 2007 and 2010 and found the argument that «the climate has changed before» was one of the most popular talking points.

You write: «Ron, I am not surprised that that is the way you want to describe it, but I would describe your choice as purposeful selectivity between equally valid and equally scientific arguments denying part of them to reduce their power as evidence.»

Here, poor strategic choices and writing that veers between banal, overzealous, and imprecise damage the advocate's credibility and weaken otherwise sound substantive arguments.

Rejecting a similar argument that a statutory anomaly (between property and non-property taxes) made «not a whit of sense,» we explained in one recent case that «Congress wrote the statute it wrote» — meaning, a statute going so far and no further... The same could be said of [the PPACA conditioning tax credits on states establishing Exchanges].

In substance, I don't see any difference between preparing a pleading (including a factum) filed in court that some layer then copies, or writing an article for a legal journal that tells some lawyer exactly how his or her argument should be made, even if it doesn't contain the exact words.

The most important point this book makes is that, in writing a persuasive legal brief, you have to draw a fine line between setting forth the facts and legal arguments, but also making the damn thing readable.