Sentences with phrase «writing arguments for»
Looking for titles to use for close reading and writing arguments for teens?
https://www.booklistonline.com/ Not exact matches
The report, from 2012, did not claim that those people voted illegally in an election, as it was written as an argument for modernizing the US voting system.
«The argument is the types of things we're doing now with information technology just don't show up in GDP because a lot of what we do on the Internet is free,» or very nearly so, says Philip Cross, a former chief of economic analysis at Statistics Canada who wrote a paper on the slow - growth economy for the Fraser Institute think tank last year.
«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»
«The US government acted as police force (identifying the foreign government's crime), prosecutor (making the legal arguments), jury (ruling on the evidence), and judge (sentencing the foreigner to US retaliatory punishment),» Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the pro-free trade Peterson Institute for International Economics, wrote in a memo about Section 301's history earlier in August.
Levi writes that as a justification for enhancing domestic and North American oil production, «the underlying argument is weak.
Turley writes that Daniels «may have the stronger legal argument» because Cohen filed the restraining order on February 27 for Essential Consultants, not Trump.
Byfield's blog post made a powerful argument for why Bill 24 is necessary to protect LGBTQ students, wrote Postmedia columnist Graham Thomson.
Wong, the former Reddit CEO, summed up the argument for «situational» work flexibility, writing in his Quora post that «remote work and multiple offices work for some people at some companies, some of the time.»
Like I wrote yesterday, even the most impressive and seemingly perfect arguments for or against God are limited.
I must compliment the author for constructing a well written argument to the evangelical leaders.
We can not do Prager's argument justice here, but readers who are weary of the propaganda of gay promotion and gay bashing alike might write for this issue of Ultimate Issues.
I shall abandon the argument of love for a time (written by Carol), or the reductio ad absurdum arguments (written by me), the arguments of Christ or of Paul the Apostle; or the arguments of seeking the Lord for wisdom (written by Gary).
Then, to claim that the bible wrote that too as evidence for your argument?
Lewis» apologetic works, writes Jacobs, «presuppose, and rarely make any argument for, the criteria for rationality.»
«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably more agreement than there is now about what constitutes a valid and rational argument for a given case.»
As I wrote a theological argument for gay marriage https://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/2013/08/26/on-the-sinfulness-of-homsexuality-von-der-sundigkeit-der-homosexualitat-deutschunten/ I received some comments which... well weren't really driven by love.
When I wrote Blessed Rage for Order, I did state that even if the arguments for the public character of fundamental theology in that book were sound, those arguments could not determine the distinctive form of publicness proper to systematic theology or that proper to practical theology.
But the argument that Professor Smolin attributes to Arkes is nowhere in the book; and what Arkes does argue for never appears in Prof. Smolin's review — in fact, Smolin writes as if he is oblivious to it.
«One thing only do I know for certain,» he wrote in Civilization and Its Discontents, «and that is that man's judgments of value follow directly his wishes for happiness — that, accordingly, they are an attempt to support his illusions with argument.»
It should be noted that the book was essentially written before September 11, and some last minute stitchings about what the war on terrorism might mean for the world and American culture do not sit well with the burden of his argument.
But if I look at your own argument «The scripture was not written to us, for us or about us.»
In a pair of articles written some years ago («The Holy Trinity as a Community of Divine Persons,» Heythrop Journal 15 [1974], 166 -82,257-70), I endorsed the argument of the medieval theologian, Richard of Saint Victor, to the effect that two persons in love with one another need a third person whom they mutually love, precisely in order to achieve the fullness of love for one another.
The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever diety you believe... If you accept that there is a diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...
Indeed, Arkes recognizes as much elsewhere in his argument, for he writes with approval: «During the First Congress, James Madison remarked that the natural right of human beings to be governed only with their consent was an «absolute truth.»
Because all of Scripture is culturally directed — i. e., because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the church.
Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.
Indeed, they are likely to conclude that we hardly need a philosopher of Anscombe's status to disprove Lewis; for Wilson writes that «any dispassionate reader can at once see many flaws in Lewis's arguments here.»
Meanwhile let me say that I hope that the present volume may be followed by another, if I am spared to write it, in which not only Professor Royce's arguments, but others for monistic absolutism shall be considered with all the technical fullness which their great importance calls for.
for in atlas and in other rand works she puts forth the most eloquent and reasoned arguments against slavery ever written.
Part of the problem with the way I am writing «Close Your Church for Good» is that these individual blog posts don't carry the full argument and train of thought the way a chapter in a book does.
In a world oriented around printed words, the sermon competed for attention by seeking to possess the qualities of a written text: logical development, clear argument, thorough and conclusive treatment.
In this context, it is difficult to make the familiar Euro - American argument that the Bible was clearly written for a totally alien society with which modems could scarcely identify, and so its detailed moral laws can not be applied in the contemporary world.
In a Christianity Today article entitled «A New Day for Apologetics,» reporter Troy Anderson writes that «people young and old are flocking to hear - and be changed by - winsome arguments for the Christian faith.»
That he would write about his brush with death was to be expected, for he wrote about everything: in books and magazine articles» not to mention his collection of observations and arguments published in the back of this magazine each month.
«Although the book was written against her now dead half - sister,» continues Gonzalez, «Elizabeth resented much of what it said, for its arguments based on anti-feminine prejudice could just as easily apply to her.
For more than half a century, Father Francis Canavan, S.J., has in his writing and teaching provided arguments both insightful and disturbing about moral reason and practice in our time.
There are other arguments for the Bible as Divine revelation, such as fulfilled prophecy, and the Bible being written over thousands of years by dozens of authors, and not containing contradictions, and numerous other arguments.
The Israelites wrote as ancient people, and their argument for why Yahweh is above all the others gods (see, for example, Psalm 95) only worked because of the shared mythic categories between Israel and her neighbors.»
This idea lay behind even Paul's argument against vindictiveness — «Avenge not yourselves, beloved, but give place unto the wrath of God: for it is written, Vengeance belongeth unto me; I will recompense, saith the Lord.»
As for his argument, Carter writes learnedly about the most notable crises of American republicanism, especially the Constitutional period, the Civil War, and the New Deal.
Raison's Filter Fiber © (joking about the copyright)-- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.
As Princeton philosopher of religion Jeffrey Stout has written, «There is no method for good argument and conversation save being conversant — that is, being well versed on one's own tradition and on speaking terms with others»
(1 Peter 2:18) argument for hatred towards random groups of people because another was extremely biased and wrote something down!
There was much writing and re-writing of the Instructions for the visitations, and Luther had to mediate when theological argument broke out between Agricola and Melancthon as to whether repentance came before faith, or vice versa.
And while some discrepancies should perhaps be expected in descriptions of very unusual events that were written down in the form we have them some fifty years after these events, this can hardly serve as an argument for their accuracy.
As for the date of the document, its references to the temple cult as continuing to exist (9:6 - 10, 25; 10:1, etc.) and its failure to mention the destruction of the temple — a point which would surely be relevant to its argument — indicate that it was not written after AD.
However, in spring 2005, when Raymond Bradley, an atheist in Editorial Board for The Open Society journal, wrote an open letter to Flew accusing him of not «check [ing] the veracity of [Schroeder's] claims before swallowing them whole,» Flew strongly responded to that charge in a letter published in the same journal in summer 2006, describing the content of Bradley's letter «extraordinary offensive» and the accusation made by him as an «egregiously offensive charge»; he also implied that Bradley was a «secularist bigot,» and suggested that he should follow Socrates's advice (as scripted in Plato's Republic) of «follow [ing] the argument wherever it leads.»
After awarding 95 points to the Company's 2010 YAO MING Family Reserve Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon and 90 points to the Company's 2010 YAO MING Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon, Mr. Parker wrote: «I am aware of all the arguments that major celebrities lending their names to wines is generally a formula for mediocrity, but that is not the case with Yao Ming.
This is not a matter of argument, ozil's poor performance is d main reason for dis article, I can't imagine a writer will ever writes dis «Should Arsenal sell Alexis Sanches in January?