Sentences with phrase «writing errors in»

By using our professional services, you can rest assured of a reliable and trustworthy outcome whether you need a public accountant resume or something more specific, our experts will exceed all your expectations and avoid all writing errors in the hope of retaining your business for any future writing needs.

By using our professional services, you can be assured of a reliable and trustworthy outcome which will exceed all your expectations and avoid all writing errors in the hope of retaining your business for any future needs.

There are too many confusing writing errors in this article.

Not exact matches

Every day for roughly nine hours straight, I gaze deeply into a monitor while either writing, editing, or scanning articles carefully for tiny errors in punctuation.

In 1986, Hinton and two colleagues wrote a seminal paper offering an algorithmic solution to the error - correction problem.

«This is a very basic error regarding one of the primary allegations by [Muddy Waters], considering the large number of purported man - hours spent in the «investigation,»» he wrote.

«The Boston.com piece totally misses the benefit that all diligent consumers provide in looking for overcharges and other errors,» Edelman wrote.

When Atchison first started her business in 2007, she would measure with the laser, then write the numbers down — a process that made it all too easy to introduce gaps and errors.

He's built up his content - writing knowledge through many years of trial and error, including being the commissioning editor for many years at Copyblogger, one of the most successful content marketing blogs in the world.

Trump was slightly more explicit in calling out an alleged error regarding her Melania Skin Care Collection, writing «the statement surrounding the performance of my skincare collection is completely false.»

(A major accounting error last summer forced the company to take big write - offs in the fourth quarter, eating into profits.)

But at the end of the day, she writes, «these are rounding errors in the ecosystem.»

No good for man hands I bought this pen (in error, evidently) to write my reports of each day's tree felling activities in my job as a lumberjack.

Coding in storage research is a technique for adding redundancy to data, redundancy that can later be used to correct for errors that occur during the reading and writing process.

«It's not that there's been one or two cases where people found mistakes in proxy reports, it seems that almost every issuer who wrote in had a specific experience where they believed factual errors have been made in their proxy reports which then leads to all sorts of problems,» says Tuzyk, who has had clients who have experienced this problem.

«It's tough to look at a full year of losses on Amazon (+56 %), athenahealth (+26 %), Netflix (+55 %) and Tesla (+46 %) when we believe all those stocks appeared priced with little margin for error entering the year, and none executed well or met fundamental expectations in 2017,» he wrote.

Also, if you find any errors in your report, get in touch with the agency by writing them a letter quickly and ask them to correct it.

Written by veteran journalists Jacquie McNish and Sean Silcoff, Losing the Signal is an enduring study of a technology that defined a generation, in a ferocious industry that leaves little margin for error.»

Get your spelling and grammar right: a business letter should be written to impress your audience or investors and grammatical blunders and spelling errors will only succeed in doing the opposite of that.

President's «economic protectionism» harkens back to errors that fueled Great Depression, say experts including 14 Nobel winnersOver a thousand economists have written to Donald Trump warning his «economic protectionism» and tough rhetoric on trade threatens to repeat the mistakes the US made in the 1930s, mistakes that plunged the world into the Great Depression.The 1,140 -LSB-...]

People have been trying since the books of the Bible were first written to find errors or contradictions in them.

I was clearly referring to errors in the written text.

If people were to look up scriptures as they were originally written in the Tanakh, they would find where errors had taken place during translation.

In The Literal Meaning of Genesis, he writes, «It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.&raquIn The Literal Meaning of Genesis, he writes, «It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.&raquin accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.&raquin error they are.»

I do not write them off as hopelessly in error.

Most of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part of discussions of the supposed errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece of evidence, method of dating or use of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments of their own in favor of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..

He corrects an error which he says «can be found in every text book of physics» (He is writing in 1958: I wonder if it still appears.)

It is absurd, and a misuse and misunderstanding of how the Word of God is written, to try to prove an error in the Word of God by finding a seed smaller than a mustard seed.

If you include a link in your blog post to my blog post you are refuting, I will get a notification in my blog that you have written this blog post, and I can come over and read your post to learn about my many errors.

New Me: You are saying that God guided the copying and transmission of the manuscripts, just as He did with the writing, but that errors still crept in?

Every writer of every book in the Bible was divinely inspired and guided in what he wrote, so every statement on every subject in the entire Bible is literally true, without error.

In my blog on Bobby Kennedy, I know I made one mistake, and at least two readers have written the editors (not me) to allege that I made another one, «a terrible error.»

The main problem with this view is that those who hold a Christological approach sometimes simply write off much of the Old Testament revelation of God as being hopelessly in error.

Writing on the subject of Arminianism, Piper asks, «But how should we regard these errors in relationship to the teaching office of the church and other institutions?»

I also tend to believe that with lots of study, thinking, and research, most «errors» in the Bible are actually due to our failure to understand what was written.

This is why all the terrible things I have experienced in the name of love, God and the church are not simply written off as little slips or slights in human error, but significant manifestations of a deeper malevolence that need brutally honest detection and committed treatment.

And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.

According to the Barna study, the percent of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word of God, but acknowledge it can have some errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent in 2011.

In writing any history of the recent past, factual error is a danger, as is distortion of perspective, oversimplification or faulty inference.

Instead, they too quickly write off the uncomfortable passages as being «hopelessly in error.»

To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).

So... when the Holy Spirit gave inspiration to the Apostle Paul in Roman 1:26 - 28 to write; «For this cause, God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature (Lesbianism): and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with me working that which is unseemly (Homosexuality), and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.

I find it amazing how non-believers pick and choose scriptures they find deplorable, post them on this venue, yet do not comprehend Jesus» truth as written... showing man who refuses to learn and abide in wisdom the error of his evil ways.

I was under the impression; he wasn't referring to the New Testament, seeing it was not written, compelled, and canonized yet, or is this error in my understanding?

Trying to bait - N - release «noncomforments» via the written word are but idle words to be the least effected ways for trial - N - error statistics renderings ever to be lost in meaningful translations.

For he [Mark] had neither heard the Lord nor been his personal follower, but at a later stage, as I said, he had followed Peter, who used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord: so that Mark committed no error in writing certain matters just as he remembered them.

I do like the progressive Christian stance as you describe it — that there may be error in many of the books of the bible — but that people, even with our limited minds, can strive to see a more perfect vision than what was written.

«I apologize for my error in judgment and feel shame for the disgrace I have brought upon the church and myself,» Archbishop - designate Salvatore Cordileone said in a written statement.

And others saying that being written by humans there is error in there.

Where I come fomr on this is, being that scripture ss God breathed and written by humans, is being open to there being error and therefore for the need of the Spirit in discrning meaning form textx and their application.