Sentences with phrase «writing of revelations»

God has not been silence since the writing of revelations.

In I and Thou Buber wrote of revelation as not imparting any specific «content» but a Presence as power.

Not exact matches

Morton used six tapes of interviews to write the biography, knowing that he was sitting on revelations that could tear apart the country's oldest and best - loved institution.

«Fraudulent activity of your employees was not limited to Wells Fargo's consumer banking operations,» he wrote in the letter, which was reviewed by Reuters on Tuesday, explaining that the revelations came during congressional staffer discussions with the bank.

In May 2014, federal magistrate judge Erin Setser wrote that the investors had «sufficiently alleged that omission of the 2005 revelation of the suspected corruption and [Wal - Mart's] 2005 and 2006 investigation rendered [Wal - Mart's] statements in the Form 10 - Q materially misleading to a reasonable investor.

In an e-mail message Scott Sinclair, a director at the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives, wrote that he suspects «these revelations call into question the validity of the distinction between foreign state - owned enterprises and private corporations underlying the recent changes to the Investment Canada Act.

In a full - page ad that ran in a number of national newspapers in the immediate wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal's initial revelation, Zuckerberg wrote that «we have a responsibility to protect your information.

«We are concerned by the recent revelations about Facebook and the exploitation of its platform,» Sonos wrote in the post.

And people have been saying its the end of times since the book of revelations was written.

George Weigel writes about why partisans of John Paul II and John XXIII need to get along, while Ralph Hancock talks about revelation and the Church of Latter - day Saints.

Together we affirm that Scripture is the divinely inspired and uniquely authoritative written revelation of God; as such it is normative for the teaching and life of the Church.

«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.

This was likely written before the Book of Revelations and the Gospel of John.

«Mr. Lincoln's religion is too well known to me to allow of even a shadow of a doubt; he is or was a Theist - a Rationalist, denying all extraordinary --- supernatural inspiration or revelation,» William H. Herndon wrote in a letter dated February 11, 1866, to Edward McPherson, clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives.

They are discrediting bible through their wit, intellectual, articulate, scientific and logical but sly arguments to convince every people here on earth that it's a 2000 year old hoax and everything written in it which includes the prophecies in Revelations and the book of Apocalypses that had prophecized their comming.

Also, I couldn't quite get this into words as I was writing before, so: I am believe that I am correct in my view of Scripture as it has been handed down to me from teachers, preachers, writers and others; I believe that I am correct in my beliefs about who God is, and about His self - revelation, in the same way that all people believe that the opinions they hold are true.

They are discrediting bible through their wit, intellectual, articulate, scientific and logical arguments to convince every people here on earth that it's a 2000 year old hoax and everything written in it which includes the prophecies in Revelations and the book of Apocalypses that had prophecized their comming.

Former megachurch pastor and grandson of Billy Graham, Tullian Tchividjian, has written an extended post on expastors.com, explaining that he was on the brink of suicide after the revelations of...

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

NKJV REVELATION 22:18 - 19 A Warning 18 For [i] I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add [j] to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away [k] his part from the Book [l] of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

REVELATION 22:19 And if anyone takes anything away from the words of the scroll of this prophesy, god will take his portion away from the trees of life and out the holly city, things which are written about in this scroll.

God gives me His revelations from His written Word, which His Spirit is confirming inside of me.

A book called Disinformation, co-written by General Pacepa and the American professor of law Ronald Rychlak (best known for his book Hitler, the War and the Pope, a well - researched defence of Pius XII's record during the Second World War), which spells out these revelations at greater length, is «dubious at best» — or at least, the bits written by Pacepa are: the reviewer NCR admits that «what Rychlak contributes, drawn from his earlier work on Pope Pius, appears solid».

The movement of events is the instrument through which truth is conveyed — the movement of events, and the movement of thought; for the movement of thought also is history, and the writing of the Book of Job or the Epistle to the Romans is an event, and part of the succession of events through which the unity of revelation is given.

You choosing to write is a contending of your own: you need the revelation of your authority and your stewardship for your gift.

She wrote a book called, «A divine revelation of hell.»

It seems then, that the only place in the Bible which speaks about the «Holy Writings,» Paul is writing somewhat about the Jewish religious view of the Law, a view in which he was taught and trained (as was Timothy), but which is proved to be untrue in light of the revelation in Jesus Christ.

Revelations 22: 18 - 19 «For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.»

«For early Christianity Scripture is no longer just what is written, nor is it just tradition; it is the dynamic and divinely determined declaration of God which speaks of His whole rule and therefore of His destroying and new creating, and which reaches its climax in the revelation of Christ and the revelation of the Spirit by the risen Lord... The full revelation in Christ and the Spirit is more than what is written» (TDNT I: 761).

You wrote: If Jesus is «the light» then it seems pretty safe that if I follow the light of the revelation of Jesus, I will not be rejecting the light of God's revelation.

2) You wrote: I understand and interpret the prophets through the supreme revelation of God in Jesus Christ.

The main problem with this view is that those who hold a Christological approach sometimes simply write off much of the Old Testament revelation of God as being hopelessly in error.

In an article written while he was in the United States, Bonhoeffer spoke of Christ as «the personal revelation, the personal presence of God in the world».10 Again, in the same article, he brought together the three important conceptions — person, transcendence and God:

BILL CLINTON is the ANTICHRIST of the bible, the beast of revelation chapter 13 All who dwell on the earth shall worship him whose names are not written in the book of life of the lamb

Wright notes that «Israel was thus constituted, from one point of view, as the people who heard God's word — in call, promise, liberation, guidance, judgment, forgiveness, further judgment, renewed liberation, and renewed promise... This is what I mean by denying that scripture can be reduced to the notion of the «record of a revelation,» in the sense of a mere writing down of earlier, and assumedly prior, «religious experience.»

You wrote: I understand and interpret the prophets through the supreme revelation of God in Jesus Christ.

They came so close to Hebrew and Christian moral insights that some early Church Fathers wondered whether some Greeks had received private divine revelations; a contemporary secularist historian of ancient philosophy once wrote that almost the same sex ethic was espoused by Plato and Paul VI.

In confining God's revelation to the written word, sola scriptura theology not only cut itself off from much of the rich trinitarian thinking since Nicaea, but limited revelation to the exigencies of human salvation.

What makes common sense to me is that this is coming from the same volume of scripture that has within it revelations from the past present and future from the time in which the events that were written about took place.

So, its's not unlikely that the information given in Luke about what occurred in Garden of Gethsemane on the Mount of Olives may have been given through revelation and then written in the gospels.

The Psychology Today review, written by John Wren - Lewis, says that Paulus «appears to be a hasty production, so much so as to suggest the nasty suspicion that it might have been rushed out in the hope of counterbalancing the possible scandal of Hannah's revelations.»

Christians often argue that, as in human life the most adequate form of communication is by personal meeting rather than the written word, so God's fullest revelation also needed to be a human life.

Revelations was written by John of Patmos who never met Jesus??? The Same with Paul — he never met Jesus.

«It began its operations,» he wrote, «by questioning the truth of certain conceptions held by Christian people — particularly the literal inerrancy of the Bible, the obscurantist dogmas concerning the origin of the Christian revelation and a cosmological view of the origins of the universe and of man.»

Since I believe the bible is just a collection of writings by a random selection of authors written at widely varying times in history, not some divine revelation, I don't accept your basis for defining «sin.»

Even before the gospels were written, Paul established a breakaway sect that dismissed the importance of the Torah and made no mention of the teachings of Jesus, focusing rather on the Christ as Paul understood the concept following his personal revelation.

-- Besides, it says straight up @ the end of the book in Revelations, «If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book» etc..

Well, it had been well written in the human history since Adam and Eve to the revelation, when they decided to listen to their own mind and heart instead of God.

The word of God is named in the book of revelation and his name is written on his thigh, the person is identified as Jesus.

I do write to share the gropings of my life in the field of ethics as I seek to be true to the integrity of the Christian revelation and to the integrity of the twentieth century.