Not exact matches
History tells us that to influence Kim, we must empathize (
note: not sympathize) with him, University of Connecticut
professor Stephen Benedict Dyson
writes in The Conversation.
I want to express a special
note of thanks to my publisher,
Professor Herbert Richardson of the Edwin Mellen Press for his confidence in me and asking me to
write this book; to Maureen Muncaster, also of the Edwin Mellen Press, for her support and facilitating the process of publication; Lois Holden, Production Manager; and Marguerite Rupnow of Lewiston Business Services, for her understanding and making the arrangements for the final typing possible.
These
notes were
written by
Professor Burch, for many years
Professor of Philosoophy at Tufts University, in several courses he took under Whitehead at Harvard University.
This is the line taken by what in North America today is frequently described as «process thought»; its greatest exponent was the late
Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory
notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them
written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the 1920's.
Furthermore it is to be
noted that through the years that have passed since 1936,
Professor Daniel Day Williams,
Professor Bernard M. Loomer, and
Professor Bernard Meland, all three teaching in the United States, have
written extensively in theological journals and occasionally in books, all of them engaging in this same task of employing the main tenets of process - thought for the explication of Christian faith.
Skelly was eager to get back on the field, but Morey wanted him to take it easy — he
wrote notes to Skelly's
professors asking them to excuse him from his classes.
I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane
writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved
professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side
note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision
I'm a law
professor and I spend summers researching and
writing in Vermont,» she said,
noting that one summer involved tending to her mother's garden while she recovered from surgery.
Professor Robert Neild of Cambridge University
writes extensively about corruption, and
notes the following with regards to the arms trade:
In their joint cover letter, the quartet
noted that they «would be able to do a better job than any one person could do» because collectively they offer varied skills in journalism, statistics, and business — not to mention literature
professor Renee Ward's «research on monstrosity and hybridity,» which, they
write, prepares her well «to interact effectively with various levels of government.»
Jon Furuno, co-author on the study and an associate
professor in the College of Pharmacy,
noted that the findings support a recent Oregon law requiring
written notification from the discharging facility to the receiving facility anytime a patient carrying a multridrug - resistant organism, or other infection requiring transmission precautions, is transferred.
Note: Portions of this article are included in a piece
written by
Professor Paul Reville that was published by TES on November 24.
Professor Dan Koretz opens his new book with a
note of gratitude — to his editor — and it wasn't just for the months of word choice and punctuation guidance she provided while he was
writing.
Writing in the New York Times, Susan Dynarski, a
professor of education, public policy, and economics at the University of Michigan,
notes that each student in the study took math and reading tests.
In the Wall Street Journal, Melissa Korn
writes about some effects of college
professors banning laptop use in class: students complaining about hand cramps and an inability to read their own handwritten
notes.
Remember when your
professor used to
write lecture
notes on a whiteboard, a chalkboard, or even on transparencies using an overhead projector?
To their credit, however, the MET researchers also
note that one should not go too far,»
writes Assistant
Professor Martin West.
In my last blog, I shared a
note I had
written to Dylan Wiliam, Emeritus
Professor of Educational Assessment at the University of London's Institute of Education where he recently completed a term as the Institute's Deputy Director.
«This book reminds us that we need to go back to models of learning and use them to help students see similarities and differences, learn how to summarize and take
notes, practice deliberately, use imagery to build a deeper conceptual understanding on which they can «hang» surface level knowledge, learn from one another, solve problems, generate and test hypotheses, and give and receive feedback,»
wrote education
professor and author John Hattie in his foreword to the publication.
On a much lighter
note is The
Professor's Daughter,
written and illustrated by Joann Sfar and Emmanuel Guibert.
I have
written several
notes regarding it, including a reference to Gummy's (
Professor Peter Ponzo's) findings.
Bristol lists him as «of the University of Queensland» without
noting that he's a student there - a student who got into the University circuit via his collaboration with
Professor Lewandowsky, and who then lied to his collaborator Lewandowsky and to me about his collaboration on Lewandowskys» paper, and then lied again in a paper he
wrote with Lewandowsky which tried to hide the lies in the first paper.
If you can stomach it, watch this entire segment with Tucker Carlson of Fox News — it hits all the usual
notes, culminating in an interview with some
professor who
wrote a book about reducing immigration for environmental reasons.
The Legal
Writing Prof Blog noted on August 15, 2012, that the legal writing professors» listserv was quickly «abuzz,» as LRW instructors found t
Writing Prof Blog
noted on August 15, 2012, that the legal
writing professors» listserv was quickly «abuzz,» as LRW instructors found t
writing professors» listserv was quickly «abuzz,» as LRW instructors found the post
At the same time he was attempting to integrate skills training through moot courts, however, Stearns also
noted what was to be a common problem with moot courts and competent legal
writing instruction in general: the amount of work it took on the part of the
professor.
While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before
professors and submitted occasional
written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking
notes of the argument; the
professor in charge that week would issue a
written opinion.124
As
noted above, the full - time
professors who teach in this program include legal
writing professionals28 and faculty who typically teach casebook classes.
Professor Sword
notes that the test uses «algorithms based on more than 1,000
writing samples — a process of informed evaluation based on extensive reading, rhetorical analysis, intuition, and, yes, a dollop of subjectivity.»
I
wrote in October about the launch of Law
Professor Blogs, a network of blogs
written by law
professors, and I
noted more recently the network's launch of Law Librarian Blog.
Many of the students in the Cohen study, like many first - year legal
writing students, remarked that they were impressed by the rigor of the criticism and that seldom in their college careers had a teacher or
professor taken their efforts so seriously.245 Consistent with this, the researchers
noted that many effective teachers and programs «do not hesitate to call attention to the gap between students» current performance and the level that they could achieve with unstinting effort.»
Duncan, supra n. 9, at 611; see also McKinney, supra n. 127, at 232 (
noting that legal
writing professors are in the best position to «take a leadership role» in experimenting with change).
32 Lee, supra
note 7, at 655; see also Tiscione, supra
note 6, at 525 («[M] any legal
writing professors have incorporated professional e-mail into their first - year courses.»).
Accord Kosse & ButleRitchie, supra
note 10, at 84 — 85 (reporting that lawyers, judges, and law
professors most frequently listed concision, clarity, and organization as the most important qualities of good legal
writing).
See also Bradford, supra
note 29, at 1094 — 95; David Nadvorney, Teaching Legal Reasoning Skills in Substantive Courses: A Practical View, 5 N.Y. City L. Rev. 109, 109 (2002); and Reed, supra
note 32, at 303 for further discussion about
professors» dismay about the quality of student exam -
writing.
See also Lake, supra
note 15, at 1026 (
noting that
professors mean different things when they say IRAC); Adam G. Todd, Exam
Writing As Legal
Writing: Teaching and Critiquing Law School Examination Discourse, 76 Temp.
Professor Coughlin's nominator
noted: «One of Chris» most unique contributions to Wake specifically, and to legal education generally, is fostering dialogue between legal
writing teachers and «doctrinal» teachers.
An example I like to use when explaining KM to law students is to imagine the following scenario (of course keeping in mind prohibitions against academic plagiarism): What if at law school you had easy (online) access to every course summary, your
professor's
notes and slides, past exams and model form answers, all essays
written by all law students organized by topic and course, etc..
Columns are
written by
noted legal scholars, law
professors and commentators.
(I
note in particular that Christie Blatchford interviewed one
professor, Bruce Pardy, who had essentially
written the same column she was now
writing.