Students read short passages to practice reading comprehension, word study, and
written responses to texts.
She believed that knowledge is constructed through interaction with the more knowledgeable others in a community, and that Book Club program created a lot more opportunities for students to develop their literacy knowledge and skills by reading good literature,
writing responses to the texts, sharing / discussing their responses with each other, and constructing meanings collaboratively.
Not exact matches
The bulk of academic
writing in my discipline is not really
writing but a collection of marks on paper put down in
response to similar marks put down in
response to other marks put down in
response to... The authors of these
texts do not have a conception of
writing as an art, or of the need for the imagery, inflection, and rhythm that hold open the mind of the reader so that the thought can slip past them into his soul.
I have ventured into
writing commentaries on the biblical books in Malayalam, approaching the Bible in two senses of the word, layman: namely, inadequate scientific understanding of the
text but primarily concerned with
response to life - situations.
I don't have enough space
to reproduce the whole of Fr Finigan's account of the article with his
response; for that you must go
to his blog; at the time of
writing The Tablet has not hunted down all online copies of the whole
text, which can be seen on, for instance, the exlaodicea and the Irishpilgrim blogs.
And I freely admit I sometimes use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences
written quickly and in a stream - of - conscientiousness, run - on sort of fashion with occasional typos mostly due
to fatigue of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I
write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt of «
text filibustering» not that this is exactly filibustering more a spontaneous
text performance
response joke and meant in jest
to be absurdly long and useless so of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.
However, it was the
text written by Dwyane Wade in
response to Kevin Durant's ranking «diss» that truly slayed me:
I get a lot of questions from clients that revolve around what
to say when, how
to write the perfect
response to a
text message, when
to call or not — basically «tactics».
Additionally, student
response to texts has improved; some of the posts they must
write are based on stimulus
texts of their choice.
When PBL teachers design and conduct projects, we need
to be sure that our projects are rooted in the verbs targeted in CCSS - specific skills, such as close reading of
text and
writing in
response to text.
Often, students will
write informal journal
responses to sum up and record their thinking, and on occasion, they'll
write a synthesis essay after we study several
texts on a certain topic.
Now, I'd like you
to think about if it was a book that was a
response to another author's
text or was it a book
written in a creative manner?
Differentiation by colour: purple = lower ability blue = middle ability yellow = higher ability All
texts for study are included as are: - sample exam questions - sample
responses - medium term plans Lessons allow students
to develop skills in: - selecting and retrieving - synthesis - language analysis - comparison -
writing view points and perspectives
Students learn through the following tasks: - Gauging and collaborating previous knowledge through an interactive starter task; - Identifying the descriptive devices in sentences
written about 19th Century characters; - Building close reading skills through a study of a fiction extract from Frankenstein - Answering exam - style questions interpreting and inferring the key meanings in the
text; - Using models and templates
to write extended analysis
responses about the descriptive language used in the fiction extract; - Peer assessing their partners» learning attempts.
Whereas students in the past may have read something, then moved immediately
to write personal
responses and narratives, the Common Core pushes them and their teachers
to stay with the
text —
to use the author's words and other evidence within the
text to answer questions and
to support analysis.
«Single draft, single authored compositions created at school desks with pen and paper, under restricted time and in
response to imposed topics and
text types are quite different from
writing for authentic purposes,» the authors write, but add that's exactly what happens in a lot of classrooms and how it is tested in Australia's NAPLAN Writing Test at Years 3, 5, 7
writing for authentic purposes,» the authors
write, but add that's exactly what happens in a lot of classrooms and how it is tested in Australia's NAPLAN
Writing Test at Years 3, 5, 7
Writing Test at Years 3, 5, 7 and 9.
As it's well known that
written text can be left open
to interpretation or misinterpretation at any time, it's crucial
to craft well thought out
responses and posts
to others.
This «Core of the Core» comprises the first half of the book and instructs educators on how
to teach students
to: read harder
texts, «closely read»
texts rigorously and intentionally, read nonfiction more effectively, and
write more effectively in direct
response to texts.
Teachers, however, do need
to teach more intensively, focusing attention on how students can apply more
writing skills independently, in combination, and in
response to increasingly complex
texts and tasks.
Performance tasks in the Smarter Balanced assessment demand that students demonstrate their
writing skills by crafting stories or essays in
response to several rich sources, including
texts from a variety of content areas.
There was 100 % agreement on coding of coaching for word recognition during reading, 94 % agreement on providing explicit phonics instruction, 94 % agreement on practicing sight words, 96 % agreement on asking
text - based questions, 96 % agreement on asking higher level questions, and 100 % agreement on
writing in
response to reading.
Thus we decided
to create one large category labeled reading instruction (which included teacher - directed reading of narrative and expository
text; instruction in phonics, vocabulary, and comprehension; and literature circles); the other original categories — independent reading,
writing in
response to reading, other
written composition, spelling, reading aloud
to students — remained intact.
For comprehension instruction, eight different instructional practices were observed and coded: doing a picture walk; asking for a prediction; asking a
text - based question; asking a higher level, aesthetic
response question; asking children
to write in
response to reading (including
writing answers
to questions about what they had read); doing a story map; asking children
to retell a story; and working on a comprehension skill or strategy.
For further analysis, we focused on those categories for which 10 or more teachers were frequently observed
to have used the strategy: asking
text - based questions, asking higher level questions, and asking children
to write in
response to what they had read.
Twenty - nine of 70 teachers were frequently observed asking
text - based questions, and 27 were frequently observed having children
write in
response to what they had read.
Allow students
to draw images with labels as
responses on an Interactive Story Map or separate each story element «web» onto separate pages
to provide students with more space
to reflect on a
text or plan their fictional
writing piece.
The teacher projects an image or
text onto the whiteboard and asks students individually or in groups
to provide a
written response / comment / explanation which they then place on the relevant area.
Effective teachers have a repertoire of techniques for enhancing children's comprehension of specific
texts, including discussion,
writing in
response to reading, and multiple encounters with complex
texts.
«The centre is
to be commended for the way it elicited detailed
responses from students
to substantial
texts,»
wrote the exam board moderator.
Whereas the old standards frequently encouraged students
to read a book and then go off and
write a
response to it, the new standards encourage them
to go back
to the
text and pick out specific passages for study and as evidence.
Challenge courses also have students read multiple sources of informational
text, apply close - reading and critical - thinking strategies
to complex
texts, and
write and revise evidence - based
responses to those
texts.
In analytical
writing in
response to text, students read a complex
text and adopt an analytic stance in their
writing about it.
Incorporating Coherence of Topics as a Criterion in Automatic
Response -
to -
Text Assessment of the Organization of
Writing
Using backwards design principles, teachers target the essentials: high - quality assignments and student - centered instructional sequences focused on
writing in
response to complex
texts in all disciplines.
A
response to justify a negative view toward e-
text would be, for example, «[I prefer paper
text] because I can
write notes on the pages and use highlighters.»
ThinkCERCA focuses on developing students» ability
to read a
text and produce a
written response using the CERCA framework: (1) make Claims, (2) support claims with textual Evidence, (3) explain their Reasoning, (4) recognize Counterarguments, and (5) use language that appeals
to a particular Audience.
The deep exploration complex
texts in a Paideia seminar helps jumpstart the
writing process by giving students a forum in which
to express their own ideas about the
text and refine those ideas in
response to the comments of others.
Teachers assign
writing topics based on personal tastes, timely events, or in
response to texts student have read.
This item type requires students
to closely read and analyze
text passages and articulate their analysis in
writing using
text evidence
to substantiate their
response.
To respond to a TDA prompt, students must read literary and / or informational text and then write an essay response that draws evidence, both explicit and implicit, from the text to support their analysis using effective written communication knowledge and skill
To respond
to a TDA prompt, students must read literary and / or informational text and then write an essay response that draws evidence, both explicit and implicit, from the text to support their analysis using effective written communication knowledge and skill
to a TDA prompt, students must read literary and / or informational
text and then
write an essay
response that draws evidence, both explicit and implicit, from the
text to support their analysis using effective written communication knowledge and skill
to support their analysis using effective
written communication knowledge and skills.
Today's students, whether proficient or struggling in the
writing process, face rigorous standardized assessments and Common Core expectations that require them
to be able
to read various genres of
text, synthesize information from non-fiction sources, apply real world comprehension connections, and ultimately
write in
response to reading.
Students will be given a passage of
text and will have
to construct a
response based on questions over that passage in a specific form of
writing that the question asks for.
Help students unpack their
responses to a
text or video using this structured protocol that requires alternating between thinking and
writing.
Notice how the task requires students
to assess a claim, synthesize information from multiple rigorous
texts (provided as part of the item); analyze the quality of the authors» arguments; and develop a cohesive
written response:
If I provide visual cues (like pointing
to the
text, or
writing the questions on a chart or a handout) when I am asking questions about
texts, and if I provide oral language stems when I ask students
to talk about these questions, my English - language learner students will reread
texts in
response to my questions and will use the stems
to verbalize their answers.
The
texts, created by
writing school students, were displayed on the screen for the audience
to read along as the editors worked their way through the copy, exposing their candid editorial
responses and rationales for what they recommended doing
to the content.
Improving a manuscript in any of the following ways: a.) identifying and solving problems of overall clarity or accuracy reorganizing paragraphs, sections or chapters
to improve the order in which the
text is presented b.)
writing or rewriting segments of
text to improve readability and flow of information c.) revising any or all aspects of the
text to improve its presentation d.) incorporating
responses to queries and suggestions creating a new draft of the document.
Writing a
response to literature essay is not simply a matter of reading the
text, understanding it, and expressing an opinion about it.
«Yeah, I am a bad person,» Baker
wrote in a
text - message
response to a relative's inquiry about the dog, who she called Mia, according
to an affidavit of probable cause.
WOUO is an acronym for Word Of Unknown Origin and is a publication of artists»
texts, featuring Susan Conte, Faye Green, Erika Landström, Ingo Niermann, Samuel Hasler, Aniara Omann, Line Ebert, and Ryaner himse; f. Each artist was sent «a large and random group of lonely words of unpinpointable beginnings (267 wouos and counting)» and asked
to contribute
writing in
response.