You can't be prosecuted for
writing something false about a company.
If the district is going to accuse «a local news outlet» of
writing something false, it has an obligation to explain exactly what was contradicted.
Not exact matches
Your statement about» the sword that attempts to separate the sheep from the goats, the wheat from the chaff, the true believer from the
false» reminds me of
something I
wrote a couple months ago.
It is also impressive that before these true stories about Jesus were
written down (in that 27 - 30 year period) Christians would sort of have «story time» and orally present the events we find in the Gospels, and there was absolutely no room for fluffing up the story or saying
something false because during that time, people who actually witnessed Jesus» ministry were still alive and would have quickly corrected the mistakes.
So, for instance, if it is not clear to the readers of my work that my
writing is done by an Episcopalian Christian, I will have failed to practice this virtue — which, of course, includes my making clear at which points the materials I study or engage seem to me
false, noxious, or incomplete; just as it includes my making clear when and in what ways it seems to me that the materials I engage are true, have taught me
something I didn't know before, or may be of use to me and my community in its search to apprehend and incarnate the gospel.
And Jude, though he wanted to
write something positive and encouraging, found it necessary to
write a letter of warning against the
false teachers who were infiltrating the church.
The men who
wrote the book took the liberty to create a
something that was completely
false and evil.
Holy hell... is it even possible to
write something on this site without somebody jumping in and making gross mischaracterizations and
false assumptions?
On the surface, the story follows Elizabeth as she enters her freshman year at Harvard University on a journalism scholarship -
something she presumably won from Seventeen magazine after sending in a well -
written article about her parent's divorce that was totally
false.
That
something else he
wrote somewhere else was true does not change the fact that the quoted sentence was
false.
My bigger concern is if you
write something that is discovered to be
false - My understanding is if you were sued, you would have to prove that you published your article in good faith, believing everything you said was true.
Instead,
write down what you do know, such as the month and year of employment instead of putting down
something that could be confirmed to be
false later on and would discredit your word.