Sentences with phrase «writing up to this point»

It is a concise summary of everything written up to this point by N. T. Wright about Israel as the people of God, Jesus as the Son of God, the significance of His resurrection, and the role of the church within the Kingdom of God.

She was written up to that point as one tough cookie.

This article's highlighted miniseries will be Squadron Supreme, because it's easily my personal favorite and has so many things it brought to the table as to changing the way comics had been written up to that point.

Including Certifications on a Resume Following best practices for resume writing up to this point, you should have your contact information, education, and work experience listed in an immediately accessible way.

Following best practices for resume writing up to this point, you should have your contact information, education, and work experience listed in an immediately accessible way.

Not exact matches

«Like me, you've put on a mask at some point in life,» she writes in the introduction to Laugh It Up, «denying your true desires, wants, and identity.

The mental boost was «equivalent to a ten - point increase in IQ,» according to the Association for Psychological Science write - up of the study.

As Recode's Kara Swisher noted when writing up her interview: «Note to Mark: You are the right and only person to speak for Facebook at this point in the controversy.»

The consensus for why these two shelled out to the Ontario Teachers» Pension Plan for 79.53 % of MLSE could have been summed up in a headline, with three words written in all - caps and 5,678 - point type: «CONTENT!

Step two couldn't be simpler, and as Business Insider pointed out in its write - up of Boothman's book, «research also suggests that smiling when you meet someone in a happy context is a useful way to get them to remember you.»

I've written before about how Twitter has a tendency to become an echo chamber, where certain points of views on issues are blown up while other perspectives aren't heard at all.

Jeff Haden writes that this phrase «implies you haven't been honest, or open, or forthcoming up to this point.»

I wrote up some talking points for preparing to close the business, and why I was choosing to do so.

Olympus Corp ended up 6.6 percent to 1,985 yen, reaching the 2,000 - line at one point for the first time since October 2011, after UBS Securities started its coverage with a «buy» rating and a target price of 3,000 yen as the company on Monday submitted to the Tokyo Stock Exchange a written affirmation on the internal control system as stipulated in the securities listing regulations.

«We will be asking him to respond in writing to the committee on these points; however, we are mindful that it took a global reputational crisis and three months for the company to follow up on questions we put to them in Washington D.C. on February 8.

«These include the ability to write checks against brokerage accounts and link debit cards to those accounts for easier access via either ATMs or point - of - sale transactions, or through brokerage accounts that have been set up to act like checking accounts.»

Use language appropriate to the visitor based on the target audience Heat maps show an F pattern is used when scanning content, so using bold headings and sub-headings to make it easier to scan and break up a copy Change paragraphs to bulleted lists Put the main point first (inverted pyramid) Use personal pronouns Put yourself in the place of the visitor and consider questions the visitor may have, then get to the point with the answer Add links, if appropriate, to keep the visitor engaged on your site and to keep them from searching elsewhere Name links (and anchor text) in a way that the visitor will know what to expect when they click Find out what keywords visitors are searching for to reach your site and write with these keywords in mind These tips are a great starting point for anyone wanting to optimize their website content.

You however don't see your own hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the word of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.

It is clear you did not read it with an eye towards finding out the truth of what was written, or you wouldn't have bothered reading all those made up stories only to proclaim you were a christian at a later point.

So anyone writing a «made up story about an unknown called Stephen» at this point, they have it all for a story, a prophet of God telling off high priests soon after the Son of God was put to death and rose again.

His point of view wound up being the accepted version, due largely to his persistent travel and writing to admonish those who were on the «wrong» path.

But I have been making the final draft of my Giffords — and having to keep the whole scheme of thoughts in my head, so as to get all the points written up in order.

Up to this point, Nova had always taken its time in selecting curricula, at times writing its own textbooks.

You see, up to this point in When God Pled Guilty, I have only been writing «theological theory.»

Having a consistent writing routine, i.e. just showing up to do the work every day regardless of how the writing goes, is his prime point.

I grew up in the church all my life but I was following God's path, I didn't want to let God take control of my life but then at one point of my life I was going through a lot, stuff that a teenager shouldn't be going through but then I told God that I want him in my life to take control and to write out my path not me and right when I said that I felt happiness, I felt love, I felt and I still feel (what God wants me to do) that I have a purpose in life.

It's also a Bible verse, which I thought, based on what you wrote a few lines later, is bad form to use to back up one's points.

I would take the time to go through your post point by point, but it would take a while to write, and the comment would end up on page 2 or 3.

I can also write down the stuff I dream up and call it scripture and point to it like you like to point to the scripture that you believe in.

We can summarize the discussion up to this point by saying that the literary form of Mark's tomb pericope shows definite signs of having developed in three stages, consisting of two appendices with one third final addition (leaving aside the fact that in the second century a still further addition of Mark 16:9 — 20 was made) and that because of this, it may not have been part of the author's original plan as he set out to write his Gospel.

Here was Alyssa Rosenberg at the Washington Post claiming that the whole point of Wonder Woman is that she's a role model for prepubescent girls, a kind of «Fearless Girl» avant la statue: «[T] he movie... argues that it's... little girls all over the world who stand to gain if they can grow up free of the distorting influence of misogyny,» Rosenberg wrote, with a schoolmarm's didacticism.

And they got upset and were trying to figure things out and finally became so frustrated that the Law was so hard to follow and God kept sending them into captivity and there was so much death and eventually the prophets started prophesying about a day that would come where the hearts of the fathers would return to their children and a sacrifice that would be the final sacrifice so that they could all stop killing so many animals (which God also admitted He never wanted in the first place because that was not the point), and also that God would eventually wipe out the old system and write his law on their hearts and minds so that they could finally follow him without making so many mistakes and messing up everything.

We don't have to beat ourselves over the head if the words didn't come just right, or if we forgot eight of the fifteen points in the «gospel outline» that our pastor wrote up.

Now up to this point, we could say, «Well, James is a Jew, and so he would refer to all Jews as his brethren, so really, so far, it is hard to tell who he is writing to aside from Jews in general.»

And while making the point about God's gifts to us, she sees the sacramental message that is written into creation itself: «Food is and always will be a sign built into the order of creation, physical nourishment that illuminates and spiritual nourishment we receive in Holy Communion... the more we see food in that light — the more we see it as a perpetual sign of God's goodness and love — the more fully we can understand the Eucharist as a holy and tremendous sacrifice in which love and gift, grace and life are bound up together.»

THink for yourself... obviously it stirred you up... and you are still responding... because the way i wrote it was to incite those feelings... how else can you get to say all you want... if i wanted to spend all night writing then maybe id care... but as i said... leaders do not care what others think... your opinions are as well founded as a mermaid on land... because the way i write a blog does not hinder my ability to get my point across... try adding feeling to your writing... and you might find it works better than your seemingly monotnous tone

That fact threatens a certain sector of my fellow atheists, to the point that THEY start to come up with delusional conspiracy based explanations as to who wrote this post / article — an theist.

You know my long - standing point, which I'm glad to say is being picked up in some legal writing, that there are not two clauses but one.

I am sure I will learn a lot more in the future as I continue to write and publish books, but this book contains what I know up to this point.

«A slight sweet and a tad over-salted chili is more important to pick up judges» points than the correct blend of other chili flavors,» he wrote.

Of course I knew that I would never get around to editing and writing up this post with all the wedding madness going on, but I get points for trying, right?

«[We] went point by point to validate that what they were doing on the production line matched up with their written plans.

Hi Martha, Thanks for writing this up and sharing — you bring up some good points for me to consider.

I say good write up but you have succeeded in analysing what your opinion about Wenger's short Cummings but u have failed to provide solutions to these your points... like..

@axelhare If you have to write such a long critique of what you think is wrong or needs changing without mentioning the manager that is surely pointing up a blind spot in your analysis?

Then the 2016 Home Run Derby happened, and it reinforced all of the points that I was going to make with the big, long feature, so I stayed up all night and wrote and wrote and wrote.

The Writers criticism of supporters waving WENGER OUT BANNERS is wrong.Supporters have every right to show their contempt of this man who has now made himself the point of ridicule and a laughing stock within the football world.Im talking opposition supporters, tv and press as well as the ever increasing majority of the Arsenal Fanbase.Who ever wrote this article has misjudged the mood of the support and is badly mistaken if he feels his comments will carry any credibility.How many WENGER IN banners are held up each match?The only chants for Wenger to stay are from our opponents fans.Of course they want him to stay.Why wouldn't they?

Although point spread and handicap football bets follow the same core principle, they're slightly different from each other — the reason it makes sense to go over them in one single write - up.

This game has 3 points written all over it for the gunners, and hopefully moving up to 4th place!

To back up in your response, you wrote «Case in point, SMU got the death penalty for paying its players, yet the bagmen haven't really gone away, as evidenced by Ole Miss and Auburn and whoever else will get caught next.»