I wrote a case comment here where I expand on the points I make above.
The chapter on legal writing briefly addresses how to
write case comments, legal memoranda and facta.
Prof. Russ Brown (of the University of Alberta Faculty of Law) and I have
written a case comment about Clements and what should happen in the Supreme Court, based on our view of the evidence as recounted in the trial and appeal reasons, and as set out in the factums of the parties.
Not exact matches
«O'Leary Funds and Stanton combined had over the last nine years many part - time and full - time team members,» O'Brien and Poirier
wrote to Maclean's, while declining to
comment on the
case specifically.
On the last day of the public
comment period over the proposed equity crowdfunding rules, a slew of stakeholders
wrote into the SEC on the topic of liability in the
case of fraud.
Inc.com The Best Small Business Blogs Brief
Case Study: Liz Strauss appreciating readers on Successful Blog through
comments and through encouragement awards The Blogosphere's Original S.O.B. Rossonerian — AC Milan News Blog You Can't Have a Community Without People: A Chat With Liz Strauss Liz Strauss the Voice Behind the Blog A Personal Interview with Liz Strauss Interview with Liz from the Successful - Blog Learn from Liz: An interview with successful blogger Liz Strauss Someone I'd Like You to Meet
Write Up Your Alley with Liz Strauss
Most Popular
Comment: In response to «Esther and Vashti: The Real Story,» Ed
wrote, «While biblical literalists can make an interesting
case for wifely submission, (provided you first accept their literal perspective) they also need to take into account the story of Ananias and Sapphira - where Sapphira was held accountable separate from her husband.
Time (March 10, 1975, p. 83) introduces its
comment on the
case with the striking words of the Westminster catechism — a document
written in the amazing Cromwellian age of Protestant orthodoxy when moral absolutes were thought to be not only propositional but «in the nature of things.»
'» But in fact one of the main reasons the book was
written, according to its author, was to show that this is not the
case; and Mr. Leithart's
comments on the book are so directly opposed, not only to the author's explicit intentions but to the contents of the work as well, that I can not help but feel that Mr. Leithart has either not read the entire book or else has not read it very carefully.
I can see Jembuts» point as he
writes comments based on his opinion to which the Anti Wenger group are straight on his
case and the old lines just roll of the tongue to criticise him.......
Writing on
Comment is Free today, Vince Cable argues: There is now a compelling
case for a high pay commission to measure the claims of top earners that their rewards are justified and necessary, even if they offend natural justice...
«My attorneys,» he
wrote, «have advised me not to
comment on the facts of my
case» — given «my possible appeal.»
In a
written response to questions about Cuomo's impact on the PSC process, officials at the agency said they will make their decision based on information in the
case, including public
comments.
In a
written response to questions about Cuomo's impact on the PSC process, officials at the agency say they will make their decision based on information in the
case, including public
comments.
Writing in a linked
Comment, Dr Pratik Choudhary from King's College London, UK, says,» OpT2mise provides a compelling
case for the clinical effectiveness of insulin pump treatment in type 2 diabetes, suggesting that it can help improve glycaemic control in this difficult to treat group of patients who are unable to achieve glucose control despite increasing doses of insulin.
1) I have no
comment on the general extent of pal review, but for sure, the Climate Research / de Freitas
case covered by SkS was pal review (I
wrote the report that's based on, i.e., Skeptics Prefer Pal Review Over Peer Review: Chris de Freitas, Pat Michaels And Their Pals, 1997 - 2003.
I can't stand when I
write a great
comment and it disappears... I try to remember to copy before I publish just in
case... I forget from time to time.
To draw inferences about the collective TPACK of the LSG from the
case study database, university faculty
comments about teachers» use of technology are compiled from the initial
written reviews and the observations made during the debriefing session.
Digging a little deeper I looked at the
written feedback given on the SIE forms and I noticed that, in more
cases than I like to admit, teachers were receiving similar
comments throughout the year and the data showed that non-examples of cooperative learning structures were still being observed consistently.
I thought it was fitting as we wind up the year to
comment on this, and to point out that as much as we whine about the impact of Kindle Unlimited on our sales, and on the dearth of decent ad sites, and the constantly shifting marketplace, more of us than ever before are earning decent, and in some
cases, magnificent, incomes, from
writing and publishing, without any help from the traditional channels that used to have the book selling business locked up.
In
case you missed it, I
wrote some pros and cons of doing royalty share work in this article and its
comments.
And in this person's
case, an impression of quirky grew into an impression of bashing those who hold different (and the more common) beliefs about
writing craft issues, and that latter impression grew in strength as time and
comment numbers increased until I finally said «enough!»
A
comment recently put to a Guest Blog Entry I
wrote for the Married (with Debt) blog stated the
case well the
case for believing that financial considerations are the driver.
I hardly ever
comment on blogs, and I never email the people who
write them, but I had to make an exception in this
case.
I'm going to
write a
comment in here because I'm a sad
case who came without friends and I'm standing alone drinking...» --
The entirety of your
comment is nothing but a load of idiotic bullshit undoubtedly sourced solely from a stupid - ass shit stain such as yourself that, as is the
case with the dumb fuck who
wrote this absolute shit - tier review, has no business playing fighting games in the first place.
[Response: You were hardly the only person to
comment on the headline (see above), and you should know that journalists do not
write the headlines in any
case.
1) I have no
comment on the general extent of pal review, but for sure, the Climate Research / de Freitas
case covered by SkS was pal review (I
wrote the report that's based on, i.e., Skeptics Prefer Pal Review Over Peer Review: Chris de Freitas, Pat Michaels And Their Pals, 1997 - 2003.
As is not infrequently the
case for me when reading your
comments, I'm not able to follow your logic there (not because I assume that what you
write isn't logical or clearly argued, btw)
Unfortunately, the vast majority of
case comments seem to be
written by lawyers, for lawyers: heavy on the facts and applicable law, weighed down with lengthy excerpts from the judge's ruling, and light on analysis and implications for readers.
In early June we
wrote about California - based lawyer Gopalan Nair, a Singapore native, who was arrested and «charged in a Singapore court over
comments he made on his blog and in an e-mail that were critical of the judge presiding over a defamation
case.»
Student -
written works include Notes and
Case Comments.
Thanks, Susan, for your kind
comments, though in my
case I can only
write with modest authority on professional publishing on the other side of the Atlantic.
Case comment — the need for ICs to consider past conduct history: In R.M., the College
wrote to the registrant advising that due to the registrant's complaint history of 16 complaints with 8 adjudicated valid and 3 adjudicated partially valid, the College would closely monitor the registrant's future conduct.
It was Alito's first
written opinion this term, Kimberly Atkins at DC Dicta notes, adding, «The decision was not entirely surprising, given the
comments from the justices during oral arguments in the
case.»
Their lack of qualifications to
comment on the subject they
write on is far from unique to the
case of the Senate.
By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Alberta Human Rights Act Applies to Condominium Corporations
Case Commented On: Condominium Corporation No 052 0580 v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), 2016 ABQB 183 (CanLII) A few years ago I
wrote a post arguing that... Continue reading →
If reference is made to what Counsel for the KRG also described as the embodiment of customary international law, namely the 2004 Convention (see Lord Bingham's
comments to which I have just referred), Article 7 is clear in providing that «a state can not invoke immunity from jurisdiction in a proceeding before a court of another state with regard to a matter or
case if it has expressly consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court with regard to the matter or
case» either «(a) by international agreement; (b) in a
written contract; or (c) by a declaration before the court or by a
written communication in a specific proceeding.»
Finally, Book 4 contains a variety of student -
written notes and
case comments.
For further
comment on the efficacy, purpose and reason for retaining, in some form, the preliminary inquiry, see my previous post on the issue as part of a
case commentary
written in April of 2015, «Does the Stinert Decision Signal the End of the Preliminary Inquiry?».
Last week on ABlawg Joshua Sealy - Harrington
wrote a post
commenting on two of the criminal law questions — what is (and is not) relevant to assessing a sexual assault
case, and how the presumption of innocence can co-exist with the empowerment of sexual assault victims (Jiango Unchained: A Discussion of the Narrative and Commentary Surrounding the Jian Ghomeshi Scandal).
Manulife wouldn't
comment on Blanchard's
case, but in a
written statement sent to CBC News, the insurer said: «We would not deny or terminate a valid claim solely based on information published on websites such as Facebook.»
I
write on franchise law and fraud, but I rarely talk about any of my
cases, unless to
comment on a published judgment, or link to an interview I have done for TV, Radio or a Business Magazine.
Coincidentally, our
case comment — «The Bounds of «Common Sense Inferences of Causation: Clements v. Clements and The Art of Motorcycle Factum Maintenance» (2012) Advocates» Quarterly 129, has just been published [punished: «Punished» works, too, for other reasons, but I meant to
write «published» — hat tip to Robert Crawford for spotting this and tweaking me].
for More details, please refer to LIC Website and in
case of any query please
write your
comment below.
Above example has been prepared for illustration purpose only, for more details, please refer to LIC Website and in
case of any query please
write your
comment below.
For More details, please refer to LIC Website and in
case of any query please
write your
comment below.
In
case your issue is unresolved or you have a suggestion kindly leave a
comment or
write to us at
[email protected] and we will help you out.
We guarantee that when you do a personal application letter with us you will receive in - depth and comprehensive discussion with our writers; we will
write absolutely tailored and unique personal application letter for you; we will make sure that, in
case you have a draft, we will polish it to perfection according to your
comments.
Wrote and executed test
cases for major features of the application: Login, Registration, Search, Playlist,
Comments, Specials