Sentences with phrase «written arguments using»

Students will be expected to make written arguments using specific evidence from reading assignments, often pulling together examples from multiple texts.

Not exact matches

It's a fairly arcane argument over whether Google's design of Android to be compatible with apps written in the Java programming language (now owned by Oracle) was «fair use» or not.

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

She uses as bases of her arguments the philosophies of «early Christians,» which I feel bears no weight as they were not the prophets who understood and wrote the holy scripture.

I also want to add, that I only wrote twice... my husband used my laptop to make his argument about the Irvings... those are not my words.

Werner Jaeger, who has written the classic history of the idea of paideia, [2] pointed out in a later book on Early Christianity and Greek Paideia that Clement not only uses literary forms and types of argument calculated to sway people formed by paideia but, beyond that, he explicitly praises paideia in such a way as to make it clear that his entire epistle is to be taken «as an act of Christian education.»

Creationism means believing in a literal 6 day creation, believing that the words in the Bible were written in English and the term day was used (it wasn't but that's another argument), and a young 6000 — 10000 year old Earth.

But the great objection to the argument advanced by Dr. Dodd is (1) the probability that Luke — that is, the author of Acts — had seen and used the Gospel of Mark before writing these early chapters of his «second volume»; if so, he would naturally have the pattern of Mark still in mind.

Because all of Scripture is culturally directed — i. e., because all of it was written for a particular situation and out of a particular context - the evangelical can not use the issue of culture to distinguish between arguments for women's place in marriage and her place in the church.

Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

Well, FAITH, there's the problem... that gibberish in the bible was just made up by «some guy» to keep the peasants behaving in a manner that whomever wrote it thought was a good way to behave... some of those guys were wise, yes, and there are benefits to following some of the «guidelines» set forth in the Bible... but it's a circular argument to use the Bible as a reason to have faith, because you have to first BELIEVE in the deity, THEN believe that the deity inspired the writings, THEN you can take the writings as «truth»... I'm two steps back, not believing in the deity at all (Yay, Atheists!

And while I have learned quite a bit from my reading in these sources and still use quite a bit of those insights in my own teaching and writing, I have also read from various alternative perspectives on the Jewishness of Jesus, and have come to believe that these other perspectives have slightly better arguments and stronger positions.

That rebuttal will give you some of the basic arguments used by some conservatives in their rebuttals of much of Wink's writing.

The fact that you can't figure out how to write «psychiatrists» or even «shrinks», but have to use the pathetic «physic», which doesn't make any sense at all, is evidence that you're not bright enough to make a cogent argument against gay marriage.

gman, you are using one fact and distorting it to something written in the Bible that has an ambiguous meaning, a common thing I see on here with Christians that try to prove their arguments.

While some charges of inefficiency probably had merit, Colleen Roach, a former U.S. employee of UNESCO, wrote that the main argument used by U.S. officials to attack UNESCO was «its supposed intent of promoting government - controlled media.

But seriously, using your argument and the fact that none of the books of the new testament were written when Jaaaayzis was alive... none of the new testament is a «true Christian'testament.

Raison's Filter Fiber © (joking about the copyright)-- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

Even later, after the war was done, an argument with Pozzo ahead of a friendly against communist Hungary was used to cast aspersions on his character, to the point that he was forced to write a piece headlined «I Am Not A Secret Agent.»

Ian Brownlie and Tom Franck made such arguments (though Anthea Roberts has written an essay disagreeing) It may be argued that providing advance legal authorization is more likely to encourage such action whereas what we want is to be very restrictive with regard to permissible uses of force but that in cases of genuine need the international community will excuse and not condemn action.

He wrote to the Smith Commission: «The argument some use to justify our exclusion on the grounds that we currently have no «parliamentary representation» fails to appreciate that the referendum was not a parliamentary process, but an unprecedented public debate that resulted in an extraordinary level of engagement from all sections of society.»

«The leader», Blair wrote, «should seek to persuade and in so doing use all their powers of persuasion, argument and charm at their disposal.

«Whether Mr. Silver engaged in extramarital affairs does not make it more or less likely, for instance, that he used his official position to obtain referrals from real - estate developers,» they said in written arguments.

In his mammoth work Elements, written around 300 B.C., Euclid began by writing down axioms — basic assumptions whose truth was assumed to be self - evident — and using them, with logically sound arguments, to deduce the theorems of geometry.

«The theories that Hawking and Mlodinow use to base their arguments on have as much empirical evidence as God,» wrote cosmologist Marcelo Gleiser on an NPR.org blog.

I found this a useful and timely post and have used it today to respond to a man writing to me with the argument that CO2 is not a pollutant but a fertilizer.

I love the way you write and set out your argument / ideas I used to run 5 miles like 3 - 4 days a week for months and literally saw no change.

Hi John, thank you for your response, although it was rife with logical fallacy and probably insincere (if you're not a proponent of juice fasting or any other nutritional program, why'd you take the time to write a long response to me, in which you're clearly disturbed by my argument and use the same typical arguments as holistic / homeopathic medicine practitioners around the globe?)

In so doing, the film's conflict symbolizes, as my colleague Vann Newkirk writes, an old argument over «the nature of power and the rightness of its use» that has long «dominated black thought in the United States,» and even beyond.

Ask each student to use the information in the chart to write a short argument justifying his or her point of view.

They read a novel about life in urban America, they write letters to city council members and state representatives, the compile statistics to support their arguments in their letters; in short, they use their discipline - based skills of scientific inquiry, math, literacy, social studies and health to do what people in the real world do — synthesize the skills and knowledge in a meaningful way.

«My professors immediately assigned us writing assignments asking us to use multiple forms of evidence to support our arguments — just like at Envision.

Teachers will need to incorporate lessons that ask students to analyze exemplar oral and written arguments, and they will need to increase the number of writing and speaking assignments in which students argue their opinion about a topic or theme, using text - based evidence as support.

Alternatively, students could use it to map out how you're going to write out an essay, allowing you to figure out what topics you need to cover, what headings you need, what arguments you'll make, and what papers and reading you'll use to back them.

Arguments that «a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds» are to no avail in Washington state, where the rescoring of last spring's writing test will penalize students who used writing conventions inconsistently.

There's nothing wrong with having students write an essay at times, as it builds writing skills and the ability to use the written word to craft an argument, for instance.

Mea culpa on using that example, as I've written more extensively here, but at the same time, it doesn't refute the fundamental point of our argument that customization — or personalization — is needed if we are to help every child reach his or her fullest potential.

They then prioritise them with which arguments they think are the best, and then use them to write an answer to an exam question.

The math standards require students to learn multiple ways to solve problems and explain how they got their answers, while the English standards emphasize nonfiction and expect students to use evidence to back up oral and written arguments.

«Teaching Writing Is Teaching Thinking» article includes information about the patterns of thinking that historians use when analyzing content and crafting written arguments.

They write, using what they've learned from the passages and multimedia to support their arguments.

Learn what the research says about how to develop expertise in this genre of writing — building an understanding of (persuasive) schema; developing stronger writing prompts for the 3 argument types (fact - based, judgment - based, policy - based); and teaching students how to find and use the most relevant evidence (text, data, etc.) needed to support each argument / opinion type.

Writing that uses evidence and logical integration and framing of concepts to advance an argument or convey an idea.

The Common Core: Teaching Argumentative Writing and Speaking (Grades 6 - 12)(Available June 27)-- Educators will gain a solid understanding of why argumentative literacy comprises crucial skills students need for college and career, and be able to show their students how to analyze and use argument effectively in their reading, writing, and spWriting and Speaking (Grades 6 - 12)(Available June 27)-- Educators will gain a solid understanding of why argumentative literacy comprises crucial skills students need for college and career, and be able to show their students how to analyze and use argument effectively in their reading, writing, and spwriting, and speaking.

He'd also like to explore the use of the program in social studies and math as a resource for writing with informational text, writing arguments, and using primary source documents.

Using the tools, which include template tasks, modules, and courses, teachers design assignments that require students to read and analyze complex texts and to write an argument or informational piece that reflects the demands of the new standards and incorporates evidence from the texts.

It can also be an effective follow - up activity by asking students to apply what they have learned when framing their arguments, or you can use it as a pre-writing activity to elicit arguments and evidence prior to essay writing.

Similarly, the National Academy of Advanced Teacher Education, or NAATE, which provides specialized professional growth opportunities for educators, works to retain teachers and school leaders through opportunities to grow in data - driven instruction techniques, peer leadership, and communication and feedback.32 Building on past professional learning successes via its network of teacher leaders in 185 sites, the National Writing Project's, or NWP's, College Ready Writers Program demonstrated that teachers will commit to and participate in high quality professional development that helps them strategize approaches to teach argument writing using nonfiction texts and provided adaptable classroom matWriting Project's, or NWP's, College Ready Writers Program demonstrated that teachers will commit to and participate in high quality professional development that helps them strategize approaches to teach argument writing using nonfiction texts and provided adaptable classroom matwriting using nonfiction texts and provided adaptable classroom materials.

During 2011 — 12, the district focused on implementing Writing Anchor Standard 1 (W1), which states that students must be able to «write arguments to support claims in analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.»

Throughout the science curriculum, students will move through the inquiry process by asking questions, using tools, developing models, carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, developing evidence - based arguments and using skills such as reading, writing, and math to explore science concepts.