Everything written in the past was proven to be bogus because it was
written by bias and prejudice people who didn't understand sexual orientation.
Argument (b) will be joined by (c), which is that
its written by biased bloggers (with the implication that its therefore bound to be wrong).
Not exact matches
It's hard not to show a little
bias here, given that this article was
written on a MacBook Air 13 - inch, mostly on a plane
by a writer in a tiny economy seat.
On Tuesday morning, VP of Search Tom Stocky
wrote a post denying the allegations of political
bias, adding that Facebook's team of news curators merely shepherd topics already identified
by its algorithm.
«This
bias is absurd and why I never watch NBC,» one commenter
wrote, and dozens responded
by posting photos of Winfrey kissing disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein on the cheek.
Trump just decided not to release a potentially damaging memo —
written by congressional Democrats — that rebuts a previous Republican - authored document alleging anti-Trump
bias in the FBI.
As we
wrote back in June about the systemic threat created
by passive strategies: «If a key sector failure, a geopolitical crisis, or even an unknown, black box
bias pulls an algorithmic risk trigger, will the herd run all at once?»
The article I referenced is perhaps heavy - handed and
biased, but here is another one with similar points (of course, they both may be slanted and
written by the «persecuted» Protestants):
I believe there are many truths in the bible, but it was
written by men, with gender and cultural
biases.
There are only (often contradictory) stories
written down long after the supposed events took place
by people in your cult who are obviously
biased and have ulterior motives.
They have proven that what was
written in the past about gays were done
by bias and prejudice people, that includes your bible.
They even proved that what was
written in the past about gays was done
by bias and prejudice people that includes your bible!
The experts have proven that what was
written about gays in the past were done
by bias and prejudice people, that includes some of the writers in the bible.
Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was
written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious
biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later,
by men of equal imperfectness and religious
biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in
writing what the
wrote, completely implausible?
I believe that the Bible was inspired
by God, but ultimately
written by Man, so therefore can have
biases of the times and / or the writers.
The
written testimony is hardly objective — it is all
by one group of people with a very definite
bias.
The experts also proved that everything
written in the past about gays and lesbians was done
by bias and prejudice people, that includes the writers of the bible.
That everything that was
written in the past about gays were done
by bias and prejudice people and that includes your Bible!
What was done in the past both
written and laws were done
by bias and prejudice people!
The experts today showed that what was
written in the past about gay people were done
by bias and prejudice people, that includes the writers of your bible.
The experts have shown that everything
written in the past about gays were done
by bias and prejudice people that includes the writers of your bible.
and yesterday one reporter from bbc sport
wrote radamel falcao blatant dive in the southampton game as a strong penalty claim... this is just one example
bias reporting that have been going around in the uk media for quite some time now... i do nt know whether he send them wine every month so he is constantly favoured
by them or they simply are afraid of being bitch slap
by him if they were to
write something negative about him... Sorry for taking so much space to blow off some frustration....
Totally
biased review and once again a struggling club duped
by carp referee.And your arrogance is horrible.If you're going to
write an article at least make it fair and subjective not just what your readers may want to hear.
cards» used to get around the inconvenience of reality
by saying: the legisation was
written with gender or racial
bias as its «true agenda» — or, argue that homebirth is protected and not subject to legislation or government oversight because it is the religious belief of the mother that «God hath so commanded me.»
This book is
written by a much loved and well - respected midwife and her natural birth
bias definitely shows.
While claiming the journalist had
written up the discussion independently, the inherent
bias meant the article promoted the company's objectives
by suggesting nutrition for successful breastfeeding is complex and not well understood, that complementary foods should be introduced earlier than Department of Health recommendations and that «collaboration between government and the food industry» was necessary to educate parents and parents - to - be.
Writings from a socialist (who fought, and lost, in a war against fascism (Spanish Civil War)-RRB- such as Orwell that are
written during a war against fascism (WWII) would bound to be clouded
by the same
biases that are prevalent today.
Unable to steer clear of
bias, The Nation newspaper
wrote an editorial on June 16th (titled That Curious Verdict) on the court verdict delivered
by Justice Jide Falola on 3rd June, 2016 in Osun State.
The lead counsel for the 1,000 plaintiffs in the new round of Love Canal litigation has asked state Supreme Court Justice Richard Kloch Sr. to remove himself from the case, claiming he showed
bias in remarks about past Love Canal cases in a newspaper article
written by Kloch's daughter, and seemed to act a little too favorably to the local attorney for Occidental Chemical Co. during a past court session.
«The question in these difficult cases is not whether a local prosecutor, including one with understandably close ties to his or her fellow local law enforcement officers, is capable of setting aside any personal
biases in deciding whether to, or how vigorously, to pursue the case,» Schneiderman
wrote, adding, «the question is whether there is public confidence that justice has been served, especially in cases where homicide or other serious charges against the accused officer are not pursued or are dismissed prior to a trial
by jury.»
c. Gifted with exceptional communication skills — strongly
biased towards conveying detailed requirements, in
writing, without any ambiguity or loop - holes which could be exploited
by Defence Contractors for their own advantage later on, in the contract performance phase, to wriggle - out of contractually binding commitments.
«The fact that women are capable of contributing to the nation's scientific and engineering enterprise but are impeded in doing so because of gender and racial / ethnic
bias and outmoded «rules» governing academic success is deeply troubling and embarrassing,»
wrote the authors of a 2007 report on women in academic science and engineering issued
by the National Academies [7].
Before some of you
write angry letters to the editor about the liberal
bias infecting search engines, consider this: The results for «miserable failure» were not directly shaped
by anyone at Google.
It was this suspicion of
bias that reminded me of an eerily similar commentary earlier
written by Ms. Sally Fallon, President of a special interest group located in Washington, DC, known as the Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF).
Online dating reviews are
written by people with some experience in this social phenomenon, but opinions can be
biased sometimes.
If you can get rid of the personal
bias in your
writing (and the extremely unprofessional stigma
by your websites tagline) I might be able to give your reviews the respect that you think they need.
The critics seem to have badly misjudged this great story, they're clearly idiots or lacking passion and a sense of adventure - maybe a result of watching too many crappy Hollywood action movies or
bias towards Bay who has his name «over the door» even though its run and
written by others.
«Two years later,» Ravitch
writes, «I was surprised to learn that the passages approved
by our committee had subsequently been reviewed again
by the test contractor's -
bias and sensitivity review» panel,» which suggested eliminating various stories.
Finally, without any institutional
bias intended, my nomination for the best prediction of 2011 was from our own Mike Petrilli, who
wrote on Flypaper that Cathie Black would be gone
by April (she was actually gone
by February).
«Fordham is a
biased organization that is driven
by an anti-student agenda with anti-public education funders,» Mark Jewell, president of the N.C. Association of Educators, said in a
written statement.
The critique was
written by Jesse Rothstein, a highly respected Berkeley economist and author of an elegant and oft - cited paper demonstrating how non-random classroom assignment
biases value - added estimates (also see the follow - up analysis).
As
biased and wrong - headed as the Overton and Simon pieces are, they can't hold a candle to a piece
written by Allison Benedikt for Slate a couple of months ago.
Social Studies texts were
written by humans and therefore are
biased.
Whether algorithms can make such predictions or not, «in an era where we are looking at testing
bias and social - emotional learning standards, the very definition of a good teacher being measured only
by students» standardized test scores is faulty,» Vieth
writes.
Yes, he made money
by going to school, working hard, and working smart —
by understanding systems, as opposed to
writing biased and sorry appeals to emotion.
We have
written about how something called subject area
bias also exists, unheard of in the VAM - related literature until a Tennessee administrator sent us a lead, and we analyzed Tennessee's data (see here and here, and also an article also
written by my graduate student and now Dr. Jessica Holloway - Libell forthcoming in the esteemed Teachers College Record).
Most of the articles you see are
written by men who learned to drive rear - wheel drive cars on
bias ply tires before the invention of anti-lock brakes, stability control and night baseball.
When we talk about the
writing, we explain what we do or don't like, and often the editors will get other «first readers» from inside the company to weigh in on the
writing to make sure we're not
biased by, say, a few people who just really don't like first - person point - of - view.
9 Ways Editors Can Make You Look Good... and 7 Ways They Can Make You Miserable
by Ruth Harris As a former editor, I'm
biased but, as a writer, I've learned that for me (and for just about every writer I know), editing is the most productive and transformative part of
writing a book.
Therefore, I have to admit to
writing this with
bias, and let you know that any opinions expressed here are mine as an individual and do not reflect an official stance
by RMFW or its members...