Then there is some of the historic blunders by pharmaceutical companies in the social media area, which include Facebook fan pages on medical conditions which do not disclose that they are
written by drug companies that sell products to treat these conditions.
However, unknown to the reader, the article is actually
written by the drug company's paid - for - hire writers.
Not exact matches
The
company is selling a thing (the kit)
by saying it can provide «health reports on 254 diseases and conditions,» including categories such as «carrier status,» «health risks,» and «
drug response,» and specifically as a «first step in prevention» that enables users to «take steps toward mitigating serious diseases» such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, and breast cancer...» Most of the uses «listed on your website, a list that has grown over time,» the FDA
writes, «are medical device uses [for the] Personal Genome Service.»
Complicating matters, many clinical guidelines are
written by physicians and members of professional societies who have financial conflicts of interest with
drug, device, or test kit
companies.
Nina and I are friends as well, even though I say her name wrong, who has also
written some books about fat, but there's this national conversation where you have the old school low - fats, mostly paid for
by big grain sort of research out there, and you're refuting some of that using very strong academics, randomized controlled trials, and the things that everyone wants, but no one has paid for except for maybe big
drug companies and things like that.
• Annual Motor Vehicle Records (MVR) checks on staff who drive for the
company (whether it is their own vehicle or a
company vehicle); • Develop
written policies regarding
drugs, alcohol, and policies regarding driving such as employees are responsible for fines for vehicles in their care custody and control; • All
company policies should be signed and acknowledged
by the employee, witnessed
by management and filed with the employee files.