Sentences with phrase «written by real scientists»

Said study invariably being a paper written by Real Scientists, on data collected by themselves, and published in a Real Scientific Journal, specializing in the relevant field.

Many good papers written by real scientists on global warming prior to Al Gore's vice presidency are scanned as images and are not indexed by Web search engines.

Not exact matches

BRC, there is no evidence?!?! what an uneducated statement, there are hundreds / thousands of books and studies, research by thousands of scientists, some christians some not... evolution is REAL... it's a proven theory and i would put that against your ONE book that was written when everyone thought the earth was flat.

Well the science would still move right along because the scientists are all going to see it in the actual journals, so we are not interfering with the progress of science, and by the time we would actually write about this stuff there would be a much clearer opinion about whether or not this was a real finding and whether or not it held up in any sort of way.

They are all quite real articles on quite real topics written, in many cases, by quite real scientists.

«The risks to the Earth system associated with increasing levels of carbon dioxide are almost universally agreed by climate scientists to be real ones,» they wrote.

Easterbrook said that the most recent IPCC report was only written by a few people, 143 geologists and not the «real scientists» who number in the thousands.

The internet site, Real Climate, (http://www.realclimate.org) has informative articles written by experienced and well - regarded atmospheric scientists, but can be hard for non-scientists to understand.

In yogic science, the real - time results of longevity and human happiness and health have been written, tested, and practiced by the Rishis and by the lineages of «yogic scientists» and practitioners throughout the past thousands of years, and then there's modern science.

The idea is to connect students with real scientists across the country through hand - written letters, facilitated by their teachers.

The internet site, Real Climate, (http://www.realclimate.org) has informative articles written by experienced and well - regarded atmospheric scientists, but can be hard for non-scientists to understand.

A refreshing antidote to the political and economic slants that commonly color and distort news coverage of topics like the greenhouse effect, air quality, natural disasters and global warming, Real Climate is a focused, objective blog written by scientists for a brainy community that likes its climate commentary served hot.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 4th Assessment Report - Climate Change 2007 Released February 2, 2007, this report, written by over 2500 top scientists, is a comprehensive and rigorous picture of the knowledge of climate change that is «unequivocal» evidence that climate change is real and is happenning faster than expected.

Mr. Dickson wrote passionately about several areas in climate science that troubled him, including: first, the idea that 97 percent of climate scientists agree that climate change is real, caused by humans, and a threat; second, the idea that government agencies had manipulated temperature records to fit a narrative of warming; and third, that China is developing its coal resources so fast that nothing short of radical population control will save us, if burning fossil fuels really does cause global warming.

Peden wrote, «' Real Climate» is a staged and contracted production, which wasn't created by «scientists,» it was actually created by Environmental Media Services, a company which specializes in spreading environmental junk science on behalf of numerous clients who stand to financially benefit from scare tactics through environmental fear mongering.»

«It would seem that Richard Muller has served as a useful foil for the Koch Brothers, allowing them to claim they have funded a real scientist looking into the basic science, while that scientist — Muller — props himself up by using the «Berkeley» imprimatur (U.C. Berkeley has not in any way sanctioned this effort) and appearing to accept the basic science, and goes out on the talk circuit, writing Op - Eds, etc. systematically downplaying the actual state of the science, dismissing key climate - change impacts and denying the degree of risk that climate change actually represents.

If Ross Gelbspan was swayed by concerned letter - writing readers of his 1995 article to look into the work of skeptics, but those weren't real writers, how does it follow that skeptic scientists were influencing the masses anyway?

Moore writes in «Great Tide» that we're in an «all hands on deck» crisis, yet most scientists have been «down in the hold, muzzled by the vague but real fear that if they speak out, they will be punished for «advocacy,» the cardinal sin of science.»