There, he focuses on an important piece, «More knowledge, less certainty,»
written by the climatologist Kevin Trenberth for Nature Reports / Climate Change earlier this year.
They seemed to claim the NRC report vindicated the HS — 60 % wrong — and that the Wegman Report was not
written by Climatologists — 100 % irrelevant since the Wegamn report addresses statistical problems that transcend disciplines.
They are referring to a 1971 article
written by climatologist Stephen Schneider, in which he did, indeed, make that prediction; however, as he himself now acknowledges, new evidence soon followed its publication that suggested that 1) the cooling impact of aerosols was not nearly as high as originally estimated and 2) there were many other gases in the atmosphere, including methane, CFCs and ozone, that had the same warming effect as carbon dioxide.
It wasn't
written by a climatologist or member of the NAS.
Shouldn't there be a host of papers
written by climatologists on the topic which use very similar methods to what you just described?
Not exact matches
«The problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed
by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks,» Judith Curry, a
climatologist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta
wrote in an internet posting this week.
«These documents are breathtaking, and they reveal what many of us have long suspected: That there is a campaign afoot
by groups directly funded
by the fossil fuel industry and right - wing foundations such as Koch Industries to mislead the public about climate change,» Pennsylvania State University
climatologist Michael Mann
wrote in an email to LiveScience.
However, two are from journalists (I'm not sure what a discussion of ocean warming below 2000m has to do with the price of cheese, mind), one a quote from a piece
written by a NASA employee interviewing a
climatologist, and KKTung is some sort of misguided mathmatics professor and very denialist in his approach to AGW.
# 125 MARodger: «However, two are from journalists (I'm not sure what a discussion of ocean warming below 2000m has to do with the price of cheese, mind), one a quote from a piece
written by a NASA employee interviewing a
climatologist, and KKTung is some sort of misguided mathmatics professor and very denialist in his approach to AGW.
Noted
Climatologist James K. Glassman of the American Enterprise Institute recently
wrote an article for a southern California newspaper about global warming being caused
by changes in the sun.
That is what is needed though, some break from the silence, for Northerners to
write down what is going on, or for doubtful Southerners to contact them just as long as their doubts exists,
climatologists mentioned above sum up very well what is going on, unfortunately they are often disavowed
by the media, paralysed
by formented confusion illusions, from the North it looks like the truth competing in a game of musical chairs.
But there's online video (use sliding control to skim through until you see relevant faces flash
by) of my talk as well as introductory roast - like comments
by my boss, Bill Keller, and
by James E. Hansen, the NASA
climatologist I've been
writing about for more than 20 years.
The paper was was
written by 17 prominent climate, ice and ocean scientists, led
by James E. Hansen, the pioneering
climatologist who since 2007 has argued that most of his peers have been too reticent in their projections of the possible pace of sea - level rise in a warming world.
According to the journal Diversity and Distribution, the chytrid fungus was most likely introduced
by humans, possibly eco-tourists and, or field researchers,
wrote University of Virginia
climatologist Patrick Michael's in a January 11 story in World Climate Report.»
For specific applications of non-centered PCA to climate data, consider this presentation provided
by statistical
climatologist Ian Jolliffe who specializes in applications of PCA in the atmospheric sciences, having
written a widely used text book on PCA.
Katherine K. Hanley, the secretary of the commonwealth,
wrote University of Virginia President John T. Casteen III on Thursday, asking that Michaels «avoid any conflict of interest or appearance thereof
by scrupulously avoiding the use of the title of state
climatologist in con - nection with any outside activities or private consulting endeavors.»
Unfortunately, the questions about the IPCC and its president come at a time when the credibility of
climatologists has already suffered, partly as a result of the theft of confidential e-mail messages
written by scientists, the content of which has led critics to claim that data were manipulated.
It would be apparent to me that the obvious problems I encountered with that program would have been
write large
by programmers and
climatologists with the requisite sheepskin.
It can be said with great confidence that the vast majority of papers from which the IPCC concocts its pulp fictions, are
written by people who not only have no degree in «climatology» but are infinitely less qualified than Lindzen to be called «
climatologists».
Last month, I
wrote about a paper
by climatologist Ken Caldeira and tech guru Nathan Myhrvold that came to a stronger conclusion: You Can't Slow Projected Warming With Gas, You Need «Rapid and Massive Deployment» of Zero - Carbon Power.
«Climatology is not (yet) a science»,
writes Serge Galam in a recent article (French, published in Agefi Magazine and distributed
by Institut Économique Molinari), and warns that the self proclaimed
climatologists of today, in the end — consciously or not — are driving the world towards totalitarianism.
More than 98 percent of what has been
written about climate change in books, magazine, newspapers, and on blogs was not authored
by climatologists.
I remember when Jones
wrote that he didn't know what he meant
by it, my reaction was to say BS, every
climatologist knows.
In early December, that group posted a statement
written by a committee consisting of most of the
climatologists assessing whether warming seas have affected hurricanes.