It could have been
written by the coal industry.
Not exact matches
«Between 2006 and 2016,» Rhodium
writes, «US
coal consumption declined
by 34 percent and production fell
by 37 percent.»
This first document from 1977 was
written by Nicholas Ridley and explains how they would denationalise the state, subvert the Unions, use the security services of the state against organised Labour, and build up stocks of
coal to take on the miners.
That, like all good nature -
writing stories, we would search and search and then search some more, and then, just as we were packing up, we'd see one: glowing like a beacon, a single revolutionary invertebrate in a world lit
by artificial
coal - fired lights.
The panel argues that the current rules as
written let supercritical
coal plant developers claim avoided emissions
by comparing their projects to power plant technology that's now a decade old.
The challengers — an alliance of energy and fossil fuel companies and
coal - producing states — wanted the court «to do something that they candidly acknowledge we have never done before: review the legality of a proposed rule,»
wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an opinion unanimously backed
by a three - judge panel.
Dr. Willie Soon is a Smithsonian Institution astrophysicist paid
by Charles Koch, ExxonMobil, the American Petroleum Institute and
coal utility Southern Company to
write papers dismissing climate change, publish op - eds saying
coal pollution won't affect our health, refute the seriousness of ocean acidification, and apparently anything else he can be paid to deny.
Release: Friday, May 27, 2016 [Theater]
Written by: Bryan Singer; Simon Kinberg; Michael Dougherty; Dan Harris Directed
by: Bryan Singer In the midst of Magneto's metal - throwing rampage, a burning hot ember of emotion buried deep underneath the rapidly cooling
coals of X-Men: Apocalypse, I glance over to find my friend fast asleep, head buried into his shoulder and a... Continue reading X-Men: Apocalypse
He explained that an article I
wrote in 2002 about fires, both natural and human caused, smoldering in
coal seams around the world, inspired him, while he was completing a doctorate at the University of California, Berkeley, to switch from studying risks posed
by smoldering combustion in spacecraft to those back on Earth.
As I've
written repeatedly, it's tough to sustain a focus on long - term needs, like sustained research on the frontiers of photovoltaics and energy storage, when congressional politics is about building short - term coalitions
by satisfying demands presented
by influential players, from
coal companies to unions.
International journalist and author Dahr Jamail
wrote on the nonprofit news site Truth-out.org in December 2014 that «
coal will likely overtake oil as the dominant energy source
by 2017, and without a major shift away from
coal, average global temperatures could rise
by 6 degrees Celsius
by 2050, leading to devastating climate change.
According to Gelbspan, «Lindzen, for his part, charges oil and
coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for
by Western Fuels, and a speech he
wrote, entitled «Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,» was underwritten
by OPEC.»
Palmer told Ken Ward Jr. of
Coal Tatoo that the paper was not funded
by any advocacy group, and Ward
writes that the paper «underwent the most rigorous peer review
by Science that they had ever seen».
The approval processes for
coal plants and mine expansions will not be halted while the upcoming multi-stakeholder commission on Germany's
coal exit — the so - called
coal commission — discusses the country's phase - out - path, indicates the economy ministry (BMWi) in reply to a parliamentary inquiry
by the Greens,
writes Thorsten Knuf in Frankfurter Rundschau.
The BMWi
writes that the composition of the commission has not yet been finalised, but that the ministry is not aware of any reasons that would delay the plan to develop an action programme - including an end date for
coal -
by the end of 2018.
Those include distribution - level efforts like tree trimming and automation, outage recovery efforts, and investments to improve customer resilience, they
wrote, while the onsite fuel supplies championed
by the
coal and nuclear sector are seen as less beneficial.
Alaska Beyond
Coal activists have helped defeat bills (
written by the Governor!)
Get ready for assertions that the NIPCC study was paid for
by big oil, the
coal industry, or power companies (it wasn't), or that the people who
wrote the study aren't scientists (but they are).
Last July, Brulle and co-author Timmons Roberts
wrote approvingly of the prospect that, «if the Democrats gain the majority in the November election, they will probably investigate [oil, gas, and
coal] firms and their front groups» actions, and might recommend follow - up
by the U.S. Attorney General.»
«[A] n electric car running on power generated
by dirty
coal or gas actually creates more emissions than a car that burns petrol,» Dr. Dénes Csala, an engineer at Lancaster University,
wrote in The Conversation.
Mr. Dickson
wrote passionately about several areas in climate science that troubled him, including: first, the idea that 97 percent of climate scientists agree that climate change is real, caused
by humans, and a threat; second, the idea that government agencies had manipulated temperature records to fit a narrative of warming; and third, that China is developing its
coal resources so fast that nothing short of radical population control will save us, if burning fossil fuels really does cause global warming.
What hasn't been reported is the complementary role of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which has peddled laws
written by corporate lobbyists through state legislatures that make it easy for its dirty energy members, such as Exxon, Koch Industries and Peabody
coal, to influence how climate science is presented to students.
American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which has peddled laws
written by corporate lobbyists through state legislatures that make it easy for its dirty energy members, such as Exxon, Koch Industries and Peabody
coal, to influence how climate science is presented to students.
But he still believes one or more of solar, wind, nuclear, and
coal will bail us out —
by the time I
write those articles it will be too late, sigh...
However, claims based on «eyeballing» and similar offered here in the thread
by Mr.
Coal - Magazine Editor, who is probably going to
write his PhD thesis soon where he refutes global warming using «eyeballing», and
by other «skeptics» are not a scientifically valid approach to provide evidence for the assertion of the «stopped» global warming.
The most formidable coverage on the
coal industry not available anywhere else,
written and researched
by Chief Analyst Barry Cassell.
In 1983, Graham Allison, then dean of the Kennedy School of Government, and Albert Carnesale, then professor of public policy there,
wrote an essay describing the dilemma faced
by a utility director weighing whether to build a
coal or a nuclear power plant.
Jeff, you
wrote: «
coal power plants in some places are slowly being replaced
by wind turbines» Not true, unfortunately.
But because most reporters don't have the time, curiosity, or professionalism to check out the science, they
write equivocal stories with counterposing quotes that play directly into the hands of the oil and
coal industries
by keeping the public confused.
For example, it won't suprise anyone that an investigation of the internet's energy use
by the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity sees much higher electricity consumption than a report
written by the information and communication technology industry itself.
In the article, Gelbspan claimed that Lindzen charged «oil and
coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services; [and] his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for
by Western Fuels and a speech he
wrote, entitled «Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,» was underwritten
by OPEC.»
«It is clear that the EPA is continuing to move forward with a strategy that will
write off our huge, secure, affordable
coal resources
by essentially outlawing the construction of new
coal plants,» US Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President for Government Affairs Bruce Josten said in a statement.
«I have a real concern about the speed at which the changes being implemented
by the Clean Power Plan will affect my work location and my life,»
wrote Ameren Missouri's John Cooper, a shift supervisor at the Meramec
coal plant scheduled for shuttering in 2022.
Can you imagine the hullaballoo that Greenpeace would kick up if this was a report
written and sponsored
by the
coal or oil industries and their advocacy groups?
I
wrote, «This move was instigated
by Glenn Schleede, president of NEECO's fuel subsidiary, New England Energy, and the leading militant in the
coal industry's battle with the U.S. railroads over transportation rates.
And ironically enough, Goodell argues, it's China's quickly growing demand for energy that presents us with a solution: «Energy demand is expected to double
by 2030, and at that pace, there is not enough oil,
coal and gas in the world to keep their economy humming,» he
writes.
Writing in response to a report released
by US NGO Oil Change International (OCI), McKibben and Monbiot echoed OCI's conclusion that no new
coal mines or oil or gas wells can be opened up, lest we exceed the carbon budget imposed on us
by atmospheric physics.
Soon, who says global warming is mostly caused
by changes in the Sun, not emissions from burning oil, gas and
coal, has
written some peer - reviewed studies on global climate change.
See Nine Reasons Why Thermal
Coal is Struggling (and will continue to do so) RenewEconomy,
written by Nathan Mim, 2014/08/13.
The skeptic's view of cleaner
coal is summed up nicely
by one of our commenters when he
writes: «clean
coal isn't.»
Burning
coal though can not raise CO2 levels as levels are determined
by Nature,» Roberts
wrote in the document.
«We reiterate weak odds for climate legislation and weaker odds for an energy - only bill without 1) explicit support
by Senator Lindsey Graham (R) of S.C.; 2) explicit support
by coal state Democrats; and 3) a drilling deal that offshore energy proponents and environmentalists can both accept,»
wrote Kevin Book, an energy analyst with ClearView Energy Partners, in an e-letter analysis.
Dear Editor, Re: David de Jager - New
coal technology won't solve climate woes I
write in response to an article
written by David de Jager, Principal Consultant, Ecofys Netherlands B....
The fact that this is a book
written by judges working at the
coal face of costs shines through on every page.
His stories for The Times have taken him to Greece, where he
wrote about the country's growing ranks of nurses who aren't really nurses; Ukraine, where he covered the economic devastation caused
by war; and Poland, where he followed so - called rathole miners into illegal
coal pits.
Gayle Howard, Certified Expert Resume Writer, Master Career Director, Credentialed Career Master, and founder of Top Margin: «Occupassion» is a term that defines my work; it represents goals I will achieve no matter what the odds and the challenges I aim to conquer.From teachers to
coal miners, CEOs to high - school students, artists to programmers, business analysts to office workers, Gayle has
written for them all.Independent research, 8500 resumes, and 15 years of daily experience has developed a superior and intuitive knowledge of what makes employers and recruiters sit - up and take notice.Partner with Gayle Howard - your personal PR machine and one - person dynamic marketing team, advertiser, marketer, support network, advocate, and cheerleader.Gayle will «unleash your career with the power of words»
by creating compelling documents designed to capture the right interviews with the right people.Gayle Howard - Resume Writer and owner.Gayle has composed resumes for senior - executives with six - figure incomes, through to young professionals taking the first steps of their careers.