Sentences with phrase «written dreck»

Independence Day is certainly dumb, poorly written dreck, but somehow despite everything going against it, it's still fun to watch all the same.
Written by Josh Brewer, September 16, 2016, at 11:15 p.m. Tweet to: @theJWBrewer Title: Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers Director: Dominique Othenin - Girard Writer (s): Michael Jacobs, Dominique Othenin - Girard, Shem Bitterman (I have no clue how it took three people to write this dreck) Release Date: October 13, 1989 Cast: Danielle Harris, Donald Pleasence, Ellie Cornell,

Not exact matches

The same applied to lesser - known titles adapted from comics like «The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen,» which was also a Fox property based off a comic book series written by Alan Moore that was such a bad film it practically sent him to an early grave and hastened Sean Connery «s retirement (of course, we're not even counting dreck like Warner Bros.» «Catwoman «-RRB-.
The other day, I wrote «Bad, Indie Writer, Bad», taking on the opinion that indie authors are «spamming» Amazon and «polluting» it and other stores with what is basically dreck.
There is no doubt there is a flood of dreck and you can't tell anyone what they're written is dreck.
No, it's not perfect, and like most writers there are things I'd go back and change, but it's not dreck — it is a story that, whether hated or loved by readers, deserved to be told — and after spending most of my life writing, I am not a «wannabe.»
Also, I get sick of the argument that goes: so many people are writing and the market is full of dreck now and there is too much garbage out there to even pick through
I'll take that any day over knowing my book, one I know people would buy because they've been buying other books like it that I've written, was overlooked by publishers for the sort of dreck they bought from Sean Penn..
It's about only writing for money, and churning out dreck all the time, and then spamming every venue you can find with that.
«mindles h. dreck» writes, «Earlier a poster posits a «conspiracy of scientists» as part of Crichton's plot.
He has written almost precisely the same kind of dreck in the past — where he twists words to determine an «admission» or a «concession.»
I believe that people like Rose give skepticism a bad name — as to «skeptics» who defend dreck like that Rose writes.
After Avvo announced new consumer forms, Ken wrote: «That Avvo has the gall to announce this dreck... isn't simply a failure on Avvo's part... symptomatic of a broader failure, in terms of quality, of the consumer market for fill - in - the - blanks contracts.»
The «blog» is one of the dreck - blogs that I wrote about previously (Are FindLaw's «Blogs» Tainting Its Clients, Commentators and the Profession of Law?)
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z