Independence Day is certainly dumb, poorly
written dreck, but somehow despite everything going against it, it's still fun to watch all the same.
Written by Josh Brewer, September 16, 2016, at 11:15 p.m. Tweet to: @theJWBrewer Title: Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers Director: Dominique Othenin - Girard Writer (s): Michael Jacobs, Dominique Othenin - Girard, Shem Bitterman (I have no clue how it took three people to
write this dreck) Release Date: October 13, 1989 Cast: Danielle Harris, Donald Pleasence, Ellie Cornell,
Not exact matches
The same applied to lesser - known titles adapted from comics like «The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen,» which was also a Fox property based off a comic book series
written by Alan Moore that was such a bad film it practically sent him to an early grave and hastened Sean Connery «s retirement (of course, we're not even counting
dreck like Warner Bros.» «Catwoman «-RRB-.
The other day, I
wrote «Bad, Indie Writer, Bad», taking on the opinion that indie authors are «spamming» Amazon and «polluting» it and other stores with what is basically
dreck.
There is no doubt there is a flood of
dreck and you can't tell anyone what they're
written is
dreck.
No, it's not perfect, and like most writers there are things I'd go back and change, but it's not
dreck — it is a story that, whether hated or loved by readers, deserved to be told — and after spending most of my life
writing, I am not a «wannabe.»
Also, I get sick of the argument that goes: so many people are
writing and the market is full of
dreck now and there is too much garbage out there to even pick through
I'll take that any day over knowing my book, one I know people would buy because they've been buying other books like it that I've
written, was overlooked by publishers for the sort of
dreck they bought from Sean Penn..
It's about only
writing for money, and churning out
dreck all the time, and then spamming every venue you can find with that.
«mindles h.
dreck»
writes, «Earlier a poster posits a «conspiracy of scientists» as part of Crichton's plot.
He has
written almost precisely the same kind of
dreck in the past — where he twists words to determine an «admission» or a «concession.»
I believe that people like Rose give skepticism a bad name — as to «skeptics» who defend
dreck like that Rose
writes.
After Avvo announced new consumer forms, Ken
wrote: «That Avvo has the gall to announce this
dreck... isn't simply a failure on Avvo's part... symptomatic of a broader failure, in terms of quality, of the consumer market for fill - in - the - blanks contracts.»
The «blog» is one of the
dreck - blogs that I
wrote about previously (Are FindLaw's «Blogs» Tainting Its Clients, Commentators and the Profession of Law?)