Sentences with phrase «written evidence before»

Not exact matches

Before approving charges, jurors must believe there's enough evidence to believe a crime was committed, and prosecutors don't usually present indictments unless they believe they can prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt at trial, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti wrote Friday.

But, as we've written before, there is no evidence that donations to the Clinton Foundation from people with ties to Uranium One or Bill Clinton's speaking fee influenced Hillary Clinton's official actions.

The evidence indicates that the written sources of our Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are not later than c. AD 60; some of them have even been traced back to notes taken of our Lord's teaching while His words were actually being uttered... We have then in the Synoptic Gospels, the latest of which was complete between 40 - 50 years after the death of Christ, material which took shape at a still earlier time, some of it even before His death, and which, besides being for the most part 1st hand evidence, was transmitted along independent and trustworthy lines.»

You ignore actual scientific evidence, -------------------- Actually, SeaVik, the SCIENTIFIC evidence is that the Biblical Manuscript P72 that shows Peter's description of the divinity of Jesus flat out proves that it was not an invention of Constantine, since it was written as much as 150 years before Nicea.

«Actually, SeaVik, the SCIENTIFIC evidence is that the Biblical Manuscript P72 that shows Peter's description of the divinity of Jesus flat out proves that it was not an invention of Constantine, since it was written as much as 150 years before Nicea.

I've written about it before in this column, which is evidence of residual pain.

«Before replying to Celsus, it is necessary to admit that in the matter of history, however true it might be,» writes this Christian Father, «it is often very difficult and sometimes quite impossible to establish its truth by evidence which shall be considered sufficient.»

the epic of gilgamesh, also written well before the archaeological evidence of Israelite culture is the story of Noah.

After that there are tons of ways to prove that the Bible is correct... fulfilled prophecy, including the names of Cyrus of Persia and Hezikiah of Judah by name and by activity hundreds of years before they were born, science written hundreds of years prior to the discovery as in the «circle of the earth sits on nothing» in Isaiah... but the evidence I prefer over all the rest is the longevity in the making of the Bible.

Stories about a magical man who supposedly died decades before the stories were written, are NOT evidence of a non magical person existing.

This may not mean that there had been no part of the canon in written form before that time, but there is no certain evidence that earlier written copies existed.

«Although solid foods should not be introduced before 4 to 6 months of age,» it wrote, «there is no current convincing evidence that delaying their introduction beyond this period has a significant protective effect.»

«We have both written to, and appeared before, the relevant parliamentary select committees providing detailed evidence on this matter to give an account of our best understanding of what took place five years ago.»

But then, without notice to Lutfur or even its own members, without presenting any written evidence, without any investigation, with total disregard for the principles of natural justice, and just three days before the close of nominations, the Labour national executive removed Lutfur as a candidate and replaced him with Helal Abbas who had come third in the selection.

He said under oath that he always intended to pay for the tickets, and that he personally wrote a check before the game — two claims easily disproven by contemporaneous evidence gathered by the Commission.

«The fundamental flaw in the presentation before the grand jury, however, is that there was no evidence whatsoever that Defendant Ortt knew the source of the monies paid by Synor / Regency to Meghan Ortt was NCRC,» Lynch wrote.»

As I've written before when writing about constituency polls of Lib Dem seats and marginal polls of Lib Dem battlegrounds, we don't really have the evidence from past elections to judge what the most accurate methods are.

The authors write «This study provides convincing evidence that the ureilite parent body was one such large «lost» planet before it was destroyed by collisions some 4.5 billion years ago.»

«The evidence before the committee leads to one inescapable conclusion: the Bush administration has engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming,» the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform wrote in its report on the matter in December 2007.

It was written 70 years before a team of physicists produced the first empirical evidence of this phenomenon, known as the Bose - Einstein condensate, and earned the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics for providing proof of Einstein's remarkable prescience.

To reconstruct the climate and weather events of the past, before written records, researchers must plumb every indirect source of evidence they can find.

«I found evidence of an ancient ocean today,» wrote Scott C. Waring, UFO Sightings Daily's proprietor, before describing the physical attributes of the purported seashells.

Well, if you're looking for scientific evidence before giving this visualization stuff a try, research shows that adding a visual element to our written goals may bring even stronger results.

Long before social media gave us a way to gather tangible evidence that we're not as fabulous / successful / attractive / cool / fill - in - the - blank as the people we know, most of us were highly skilled at telling ourselves that no matter how much we did — how many times we worked out or meditated, how many books we wrote or clients we had or money we made — it wasn't enough.

Our family has started all meat diet about 2 - 3 weeks ago (we were paleo before) and I'm struggling to convince other people that what we are doing is not harmful: i need to convince my mum who is very vocal about it and thinks i'm harming my children, her grandchildren and also i need to provide some evidence for a childminder who is very concerned about my son she is looking 2 days a week and asked me for a written approval from our GP (we are in UK).

The User shall produce to BeautifulPeople written evidence of any claims for which it is alleged that BeautifulPeople are liable together with written details of how any loss was caused by BeautifulPeople and the steps the User have taken to mitigate the loss before BeautifulPeople shall have any Liability for the claim by the User.

Under these procedures each applicant is afforded the opportunity to present written evidence as to why it should be allocated the frequencies it seeks and to file comments on the other carrier applications before the Department makes its selection (s).

For the purposes of this title, consideration shall be given to the employer's judgment as to what functions of a job are essential, and if an employer has prepared a written description before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job, this description shall be considered evidence of the essential functions of the job.

Before writing, the writer thinks about the inherent idea and collect data and evidence from different sources including real life situations.

Thus, before presenting you this very critical essay write structure we want to give you a universal critical essay writing advice: be brief, concise, and informative in all the parts of your critical essay writing, never make a rewrite of the work you have to analyze and never speak in a subjunctive way without giving the proper evidence which helps the writers to prove their points of view and not to sound unfurnished with the evidence.

The lesson here is to look for disconfirming evidence, write it down (given the brain's seemingly unlimited capacity to rationalize away this type of information), and take the time to give it serious thought before going forward.

Describing the sensation one gets from viewing Larsen's work, John Yau writes «it's as if we have never seen anything like them before... Seeing becomes a kind of detective work, searching for clues while sorting through the visual evidence.

To have the same opportunity as the respondent (s) to participate in a student disciplinary hearing before a faculty - student disciplinary committee, including the right to be present, to be represented by a person of your choice, including an attorney, to present evidence, call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, have your prior sexual history with persons other than the respondent (s) excluded from the hearing, have your prior mental health diagnosis and / or treatment excluded from the hearing, receive written notice of the outcome of the hearing, and to appeal from the decision;

As evidence for this, there is no entry for Popper in the index to Duhem's book, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, which Gavin may have quoted above, and which was written just before 1906.

TW: «Yeah, writing the summary before the report kind of lets the cat out of the bag, doesn't it, about how the conclusions come first, the evidence chosen to fit?»

Imagine if you will, someone like me arguing evidence for AGW coming to CFACT and citing an article from, not a top - tier journal, nor even a second - tier, but more like a third - tier journal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowd here.

Contrast this evidence with what the IPCC has already announced (before the reports are written!)

A wonderful, well - written summary of much of the evidence about climate change and some useful information and links that I had not read about before.

Perhaps I'll write a little thing before on our Man from Mexico's confusion over the concept of evidence before that.

Ok - I wrote a response but before posting it thought I might try cheating first, by asking you a question: Is there any evidence on any association between age and performance on the assessments you use to assess cognitive profile (assessments of the sort you use as tools to determine a causal role for cognitive profile in increasing polarization)?

They say such researchers may have testified before congressional committees, written articles or spoken at conferences, emphasizing the role of natural forces in climate change, or questioning evidence and computer models that emphasize predominantly human causes.

and all we do — let's be honest — in terms of evidence, is linking to other stuff that we ourselves wrote before, using the same sloppy methods.

Before that we have Mannian third - order proxies and anecdotal evidence in the form of paintings, written descriptions and the like.

Had climate scientists «brainstormed» decades ago about the large number of diverse causes, their relative contributions, the evidence in hand and the evidence needed, before starting the alarmist crusade, this essay would likely not have been written.

Earlier this month, one state's appellate court issued a written opinion in a medical malpractice case that required the court to determine whether the single doctor named as a defendant should be able to introduce evidence that there had originally been several other doctors named as defendants, but they had all settled with the plaintiff before the case reached trial.

Students argued the moot court questions before the professor, but Harvard also involved legal writing, in that students drew up the pleadings, bills of exceptions, demurrers to evidence, special verdicts, and motions with the professor's help.100 In his report to Harvard's Board of Overseers, Professor Stearns touted the value of these practical skills exercises, writing that «no other exercise is so powerful an excitement to industry and emulation or so strongly interests the student in their professional pursuits.»

After stepping down, Alderman gave evidence to a Parliamentary Committee in 2013, which the Telegraph reported: «In a grilling before the Public Accounts Committee, former Serious Fraud Office head Richard Alderman was attacked for his «shocking» stewardship of the organisation and forced to admit he had not obtained written approval for the severance packages to three colleagues.»

On the other hand, if all of the evidence admissibility issues had been sorted out before trial by motion in writing — the US system — and all of the witnesses that either side knew they might call had been available for pretrial deposition and everybody conceivably important had been examined - again the American system — then perhaps your trial and all of the other trials wouldn't have been as long, or have been resolved for whatever reason because the lawyers knew what the evidence would likely be, so there'd have been judges... etc..

(v) «As regards the amount of evidence before the inquiry committee, one would expect the allegation to have been made or confirmed in writing, whether or not it has yet been reduced to a formal witness statement.

In addition to providing an overview of new accident benefits arbitration process under the License Appeal Tribunal (LAT), which came into effect on April 1, 2016, Michelle will share valuable anecdotal discussion of what counsel have experienced so far on both sides, such as evidentiary and production issues at the case conference stage and before a hearing, what evidence adjudicators are looking for or emphasizing, the format of the hearing (written, oral, hybrid), witness issues, etc..