Sentences with phrase «written evidence rather»

Not exact matches

«The evidence for economic reform to date is scant and based on purported private statements rather than government pronouncements,» wrote Bruce Klingner, a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation and former CIA official, in an October op - ed for the Los Angeles Times.

And as I stated previously, Russ, if you had clear evidence, you would be presenting here rather than week after week referring to more written opinion.

I would much rather have a person who believes in things that have evidence writing and / or voting on my fiscal policies then someone who believes in something due to faith and has no evidence.

At least atheists base all of what they believe on reason and evidence, rather than a book that was written by uneducated people during the Bronze Age.

He further states that «if» (as Dr. Bennett wrote) the Pope once made a speech which «in vague language seems to approve «the American view,»» the Pope's pronouncement, «if any such pronouncement exists must appear rather emaciated when contrasted with the overwhelming evidence of pronouncements on the other side.»

It's quite sad and says more about the state of the heart of those writing rather than any evidence against the existence of God.

Its ELA curriculum focuses on getting students to read more (especially, challenging nonfiction that builds background knowledge), write more, and cite evidence for their ideas rather than just state opinions.

«In an inspection system,» Jerald wrote in his report, «trained professionals weigh the evidence for judging a school rather than simply plugging it into a weighted formula.»

We very quickly determined the organisation's focus would be how to supply evidence to enable better decisions, rather than write guidance and use compliance to make people follow it,» Collins says.

On the contrary, I rather enjoyed the time I spent with Brutal Legend, as evidenced by the largely positive impressions that I wrote on the game some months ago.

It seems he really has not looked at the wealth of evidence and there is a good possibility, based on the manner and substance of his writing on the subject, that he has been getting most of his info form denialist sites rather than directly from the science itself.

Michael Mann (see linked article) writes, «Much as lions on the Serengeti seek out vulnerable zebras at the edge of a herd, special interests faced with adverse scientific evidence often... attack those researchers whose findings are inconvenient, rather than debate the findings themselves.»

That's just as well, because it turns out that Stringer appears to be relying for his understanding of the issues, not on the submitted evidence, but rather — wait for it — the «quickie» book on Climategate written by Thomas Fuller and Steven Mosher.

That's just as well, because it turns out that Stringer appears to be relying for his understanding of the issues, not on the submitted evidence, but rather — wait for it — the «quickie» book on Climategate written by Steven Mosher and Thomas Fuller.

As the authors wrote, «These inconsistencies are so important and sufficiently abstruse that in our view EPA needs to make an independent analysis of the science of global warming rather than adopting the conclusions of the IPCC and CCSP without much more careful and independent EPA staff review than is evidenced by the Draft TSP.»

Indeed, in his next breath he resorts to writing off public opinion as the product of primaeval biological urges rather than the result of considered judgement of the available evidence and arguments:

Fred writes — «Rather, the evidence that the approximately 40 percent rise in atmospheric CO2 since preindustrial times is completely or almost completely anthropogenic is compelling in that it is derived from multiple independent sources.»

Rather «My case is that of the IPCC my chosen priests of my religious faith who are rewarded based on their faith in my religion, backed up by evidence that I refuse to present (because I refuse to present information that contradicts my religious faith) and the Science my sacred Text as written by the chosen priests of my religious faith.»

«What the Committee has written are not rules, but rather, as the title suggests, a guide to evidence based on the law as it exists today.

Consider using written evidence — affidavits and cross-examination — rather than oral evidence for some or all of the issues or witnesses, to reduce the number of hearing days needed.

The parol evidence rule expressly makes a written agreement supersede a verbal agreement, rather than making them equally valid.

«Accepting, as I do, that crack cocaine and methamphetamine are as harmful as heroin to the individual user, I still find no basis on the evidence before me to conclude that the disparity in sentence is a result of heroin being over-punished, rather than crack cocaine and methamphetamine being under - punished,» wrote Justice Nancy Spies in a new ruling from the Superior Court.