Rejection comes at you from all directions — literary agents who won't take you on, editors who reject your manuscript, publishers who give you an insulting advance, anonymous reviewers who
write hate speeches, and of course the ultimate rejection — poor sales.
Not exact matches
But if the Facebook Like is protected
speech because it ostensibly communicates «the user's approval... and support» of the person, status or thing liked, as Traxler
wrote, then what of liking things sarcastically or in jest, or — to use an example from another social network — of «
hate - favoriting» on Twitter?
«We've seen this in misclassifying
hate speech in political debates in both directions — taking down accounts and content that should be left up and leaving up content that was hateful and should be taken down,» he
writes.
«For the record, you can condemn violence in response to
hate speech, and you can also condemn
hate speech,»
wrote Jeff Fecke on Twitter.
«In law,
hate speech is any
speech, gesture or conduct,
writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.»
LOL here are a few...» Hey dipstick, Trollolololololol, religious babble,
written by someone with a far better knowledge of the world than bronze age goat herders living in the desert, what a moron,
hate speech, Christianity is by definition bigotry, you are more likely parroting some nonsensical drivel your pastor spewed forth, supersti tious nonsense, staggeringly arrogant of you, absurd, Your god is a monster.
Warsi has
written to Labour MP Yvette Cooper, the chair of the parliamentary home affairs committee, to ask her to investigate
hate speech.
The specific problem is: repetitious and confusing
writing (see: Talk: Assassins # The Human Rights Commission has asked Durban's Equality Court to find Edward Zuma guilty of
hate speech and order him to pay a fine of R100 000 to a
We also prohibit the publishing of material that contains
hate speech, or material that advocates violence against other people; or material that promotes racism, homophobia or xenophobia; or
written materials that advocate destructive or illegal activities.
Tate
hated public speaking and had
written his
speech out beforehand.
There is «vanishing public concern over «dangerous man - made climate change» and growing discontent with the politicized rear guard's increasingly desperate search for new scare words and its bigoted
hate speech hurled at skeptics («deniers,» evoking the Holocaust),» he
wrote in 2014.
A few years ago when we
wrote It's getting harder to
hate Wal - Mart, we concluded, after reading Lee Scott's environmental and other plans, that «If these words came out of the mouth of Yvon Chouinard or John Mackey, everyone would stand up and cheer - it is a remarkable
speech that all should read and hold up as a standard for any company.
This second one, over s. 13, the
hate speech provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act, continues boiling over even as I sit to
write this editorial.
West Coast LEAF has also
written a letter urging the Senate to pass the Bill as drafted and without delay to protect the rights of trans people in Canada to be free from
hate speech and discrimination on the basis of their gender identity.
For nearly 25 years, an incisive federal report on
hate speech,
written when the Internet was still in its infancy, has been collecting virtual dust.