Not exact matches
The truths of Genesis 6 - 8 (and especially 6:7, 13, 17; 7:23) can be understood differently when we grasp the
Scriptural and cultural contexts in which these
texts were
written, what other Old Testament authors had to say about the flood, and also what the Apostle Peter
writes about it in his second letter.
Since the Bible is
written in androcentric, grammatically masculine language that can function as generic inclusive or as patriarchal exclusive language, feminist interpretation must develop a hermeneutics of critical evaluation for proclamation that is able to assess theologically whether
scriptural texts function to inculcate patriarchal values, or whether they must be read against their linguistic «androcentric grain» in order to set free their liberating vision for today and for the future.
I presented on the
scriptural evidence regarding homosexuality, of which Dugan
wrote: «There is just one catch [to Gagnon's citation of scripture
texts from Jesus]: not one of the passages he quotes from actually mentions gay relationships.»
Modern fundamentalists have already made up their minds about the entire Bible, and when you try to explain that some of their favorite Bible - thumping passages have been ripped out of the cultural and
Scriptural context in which they were
written, the Fundamentalist acts as if you are the stupidest person on the earth for trying to understand a
text this way.
In
writing about the ministry of Jesus, Luke gave a focal place to
scriptural texts highlighting his salvific character.