Sentences with phrase «written than the source»

The almost page - by - page summary is faithful to Taylor while being much more tightly written than the source material.

Not exact matches

To qualify for this, you'll need the URL of the webpage that contains your review, then either select a direct quote or write a paraphrased version of no more than 67 characters, including the source name.

«And finally, a higher purpose — the sense that what we do matters and serves something larger than our immediate self - interest — is a uniquely powerful source of motivation,» Schwartz and Porath write.

«A more appropriate way to express a short view on the retail sector is to go directly to the source,» the duo wrote, where the bet is on credit quality rather than, say, earnings (or stock prices).

«Free software is more than open source; it is a movement that encourages community collaboration and protects users» freedom,» wrote Pine.

You however don't see your own hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the word of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.

The evidence indicates that the written sources of our Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are not later than c. AD 60; some of them have even been traced back to notes taken of our Lord's teaching while His words were actually being uttered... We have then in the Synoptic Gospels, the latest of which was complete between 40 - 50 years after the death of Christ, material which took shape at a still earlier time, some of it even before His death, and which, besides being for the most part 1st hand evidence, was transmitted along independent and trustworthy lines.»

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

More than half of all defenses of slavery were written by pastors who cited Scripture to make their case, and Noll immerses the reader in primary sources to unpack and understand those defenses as well as the counter-arguments made by abolitionists.

One might think that an actual resurrection would have been captured immediately in a contemporaneous written record corroborated by many, many independent Jewish and Roman sources rather than a few vested 2nd hand accounts decades after the alleged event.

The claim that in Jesus we were encountering God Incarnate was evaded: Jesus was invisible, hidden behind stories that told us more about the early Christian communities when the gospels were written than about Jesus himself as the source of those stories.

hehe, actually I got it from an article a friend wrote, and I'm not sure where she got it from, but I'm pretty sure she used more than one source.

We have, therefore, more than the outline of Mark to rely upon; it is supplemented and confirmed by the tradition recorded in the speeches of Acts — themselves perhaps embedded in old Judean, Jerusalem, or Caesarean sources, oral or written, which had come down from the primitive community and were incorporated by the author of Acts in his volume.

The sufficient evidence of this point in the case of the New Testament writings is that all of them have now been shown to depend on sources, written or oral, earlier than themselves, and hence not to be the original and originating witness that the early church mistook them to be in judging them to be apostolic.

It is equally easy and false to take a docetic view of revelation: to suppose that the content of the scriptures, for example, is, just simply, the thoughts of God, the human writers contributing no more than a pen for God to write them down with; or to imagine that a person or a group of people or an institution can, as it were, throw a switch from time to time and become a transmitter of revelation from an external divine source: a group of bishops, for instance, when assembled in council, or a pope when defining a dogma ex cathedra.

Along more conservative lines, a distinguished German scholar, Martin Noth, has recently proposed and presented evidence for a more ancient source than J (he does not commit himself as to whether it was an oral or written source) underlying both J and E and utilized by both.

Since we do not know that Luke did not have reliable reports, we can not say that he did more than rewrite his sources, or perhaps write them for the first time from oral tradition.

Although redaction criticism tended to give more respect and credit to the individuals who wrote the Gospels than source or form criticism had, it still placed a great emphasis on the prehistory of each Gospel and tended to disintegrate each text into material labeled «tradition» and other material labeled «redaction.»

Far more promising is the approach of Professor Branscomb in «The Moffatt New Testament Commentary» (1937), who views the Gospel as based upon «the common tradition of the Gentile churches,» though the use of sources, even of written sources, is not only not denied but even presupposed in the discussion of more than one section of the Gospel.

We tend to concur in the wise comment that «if the author had an ulterior motive, he concealed it more successfully than is common to story - tellers who write with a purpose»; and, from another source, that the writer «set out to tell an interesting tale of long ago, and he carried out his purpose with notable success.»

I down - voted this due to the lack of verification with references, I'm more than happy to retract that if you provide sources that can verify what you have written.

They appear to be different women than those referenced by Gleason: In tweets on Friday, the New Yorker article's authors wrote that none of the sources for that story had any ties to Trump or Cohen, or knowledge of Gleason.

«This finding indicates that students may focus more on the content of social media posts than on their sources,» the authors wrote.

I could write an entire article about this idea alone, but suffice it to say that even though no news source is completely unbiased, some are more fair and objective than others.

If it seems less impressive to anyone that Scorsese's source this time around is a four - year - old movie rather than, say, a Nicholas Pileggi book, it's worth noting that the stylistic lexicon from which Infernal Affairs drew was written largely by Martin Scorsese.

From all known sources I've read, all of the rest of the Amityville films are even worse than this one, and if that is true, my advice is to write off this entire film series altogether.

There's going to be a great deal written in the months and years to come about Black Panther, a great deal of it by people far more qualified to comment on the black diaspora than this writer, but it's a Marvel movie that also becomes more than just a Marvel movie by embracing the heritage of its source material and characters alike.

Feige talks about Doctor Strange's origin story, how the movie will be different from the comics, rooting crazy concepts in real science, does Steven Strange know about The Avengers, how the film is more respectful to other cultures than the original source material may have been, how this movie was inspired by The Oath, which characters might connect with the Runaways, Mads Mikkelsen «s character Kaecilius, multiple dimensions, the trouble with writing magic action, how Mordo is different in the movie, Rachel McAdams «character Christine Palmer, is the eye of agamotto an infinity stone, the genre of the film, how this film will defy expectations, Steven Strange's role in the larger MCU, will we see cameos from the other Marvel characters, and much more.

You may also want to write on the board a few common British expressions, and / or words that mean something different in America than they do in England (here's one source for ideas; although student access to this site is not recommended, as some material may not be appropriate for young people).

After completing the first methods class, before teacher candidates entered any classrooms other than through the cyber-conferencing experience, 90 % of the respondents said they employed the following technology - enhanced methods in their lessons: word processing; rhetorical, digital text analysis; digital commentary; Internet research; found and concrete poem creation generated through digital sources; image collage to analyze text; online chat; discussion boards; PowerPoint presentation; word processing and graphic organizers to facilitate multistage writing workshop; email; and multimedia projects using digital camera and video for some type of analysis.

«In the long run,» he wrote, «the only sustainable source of competitive edge is your organization's ability to learn faster than its competitors.»

English language learners (ELLs) can learn how to write from sources (e.g., two different fire engine books), to conduct and write up research (e.g., stories from their grandparents, a survey of classmates» pets, or school staff members» favorite foods), and to write persuasively about their opinions (e.g., «I think soccer is better than American football because...»).

Sam wrote: «For those of you who have a frequent / infrequent leak in your trunk, the most likely source are 2 holes a little larger than a quarter in diameter, that are in the top portion of the trunk between the rear - window and the trunk lid.

Less than five years after it was launched, Kobo Writing Life established itself as the # 1 single source of weekly global unit sales for Kobo and, in primarily English language territories, responsible for 1 in every 4 eBooks sold.

But not having a blog at all may be a far better move down the road than having a neglected source of dry or pointless writing, especially when the author's name is on it.

Secondly, if you are writing Essay Homework Help from any appropriate source comprising of either textbooks, articles or some other kind of source, then you should credit the columnist or the creator of that context rather than claiming it for yourself.

The word «novella» is derived from the feminine derivative of the Italian word «new» and the reference source, wikipedia.org, defines «novella» as «a written fictional prose narrative normally longer than a short story but shorter than a novel».

Writing services were and remain the main source for those who need to buy essays online since no one can help you better than an experienced writing Writing services were and remain the main source for those who need to buy essays online since no one can help you better than an experienced writing writing expert.

If the source you are citing was written by more than one author, follow the following APA term paper in - text citation format: Author and Author, Year.

Of course, if you are writing an essay on your childhood, you do not need to use any additional sources other than your memory.

You can find the NYSE holiday dates listed on the exchange's own site (already linked in answer above), which should obviously be consulted as the most reliable source; they are also published in an article that I have written here: NYSE Holidays 2016, which provides additional information about traditions and events that can be expected to lead to unscheduled closures, and closed dates for holidays that are day - of - month rather than date specific (e.g. President's Day and Memorial Day).

The source is from Purena and the writing seems to be on Purinas side not showing any proof of anything other than he said she said.

Of the last group of works in the exhibition, John Cannaday wrote in the New York Times, October 14, 1972: «The Cityscape is apparently an inexhaustible source of motifs for Mr. Inokuma, whose new abstract inventions are even more engaging than those in his previous shows....

Greenberg wrote, «I would say that, for a while now, Matisse has been a more relevant and fertile source for ambitious new painting than any other single master before or after him.»

It's a paper that is written with great assurance but where is the true scientific process methodologies (for example: ruling out all other sources / causes / explanations) to back their conclusions / beliefs, rather than speculations and assumptions offered regarding their ideas on the matter?

A new study, The carbon footprint of global tourism, is causing a stir, with news sources writing headlines like Global tourism's carbon footprint is four times bigger than thought, study says or Tourism's carbon impact three times larger than estimated.

Even if not written by her, it exemplifies her philosophy perfectly, expressing more clearly than any other source I've seen the idea that the Labour Party is morally defective and therefore illegitimate.

«The danger is that this continues to send the message that solar power is worth less than electricity sourced from a distant coal - fired generator,» he wrote in a note to clients.

This momentous switch from coal to lower - CO2 gas as a source of energy has done far more to drive down carbon dioxide emissions than any recent government climate policy,» he writes.

Holdean wrote «There have been four periods where atmospheric temperatures and CO2 levels have been as high or higher than presently in the last 400,000 years (Source: http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3057.aspx) Mankind was obviously not the cause of any of these occurrences.»