She ends, in effect, by washing her hands of the whole problem: «I have
written this judgment only to demonstrate what, in my view, is the unsatisfactory state of the law, giving as it does no guidance to the factors to be taken into account in deciding whether an adult child is deserving or undeserving of reasonable maintenance» (para 66).
Not exact matches
All the acts which I have done expressly to serve thee, and also all the acts which I believe to be neutral and purely human, and also all the acts which I know to be disobedience and sin, I put in thy hands, 0 God, my Lord and Savior; take them now that they are finished; prove them thyself to see which enter into thy work and which deserve
only judgment and death; use, cut, trim, reset, readjust, now that it is no longer I who can decide or know, now that what is done is done, what I have
written I have
written.
«One thing
only do I know for certain,» he
wrote in Civilization and Its Discontents, «and that is that man's
judgments of value follow directly his wishes for happiness — that, accordingly, they are an attempt to support his illusions with argument.»
It's pretty bad when, despite all our Bible study, prayer, and theological reading and
writing, we have to learn about grace from those who don't believe in God, who have been kicked out of our churches, and who feel
only judgment and condemnation from us.
In a book replete with evaluations and magisterial
judgments tossed in as throw - away lines, Till We Have Faces — arguably the most powerful piece of fiction
written by Lewis — is mentioned
only twice.
David had the poor
judgment to agree to speak with me about
writing (no doubt because I lied about being with the NY Times) and his new breakthrough bestselling blockbuster Vaccine Nation, in which he tells a gripping and chilling story I would have gladly plagiarized if he'd have
only sent me an advance copy.
Surely it was
only my opinion that I
wrote, but anyone can look at the two main posts side - by - side and form their own
judgments of where I am wrong and where, if ever, I am right.
Yet the proposals themselves are so lacking in wisdom and
judgment that the
only really good response is either the best
writing you have ever read in your life (I'm all out today, sorry) or a rollicking satire.
Accordingly, in the absence of an explicit or legislated public restriction, the
only sustainable personal privacy protection approach for public documents like court
judgments derives from the exclusion of personal information at the time it is
written.
Judgments are not
only written for the parties, but also for the public.
Judge Reiss granted the defendants» motion for summary
judgment, finding that «the
only reasonable interpretation of that language is that it requires Killington Ltd. to provide the designated passholder free use of all ski lifts operated by Killington Ltd. at the Killington Ski Area so long as it operates in that area... «The term corporation, she
wrote, «clearly refers to the named corporations, Sherburne and Killington Ltd.» and «reveals no intention to bind Killington Ltd's successors... To the contrary, Killington Ltd.'s obligations under the passes clearly terminate with its cessation of operations in the area.»
If
only it were that simple,»
wrote Master Peter Keighley in a recent pre-trial
judgment concerning amendment applications brought by the two parties.
As for the concept that juries have not
only the power but the obligation to nullify unjust rulings of a judge, John Adams
wrote, «It is not
only [the juror's] right, but his duty... to find the verdict according to his own best understanding,
judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.»
The so - called «client» — usually a woman, and always
writing from some far - away country (typically Japan, China, Taiwan, or Korea)-- details how she has obtained a sizeable divorce
judgment against her ex-husband but has succeeded in collecting
only a portion of it from him.
I then had the idea of
writing this paper to clarify his «wrongness»,
only to discover that, in fact, he may have been on the front line of a growing line of authority that has quietly been percolating under the radar, and which appears to be evolving into a resurgence of the concept of «debtor prison» as a tool for execution on civil
judgments.
The decision
written by Abella was joined by
only two other judges (Justice Michael Moldaver
wrote a concurring
judgment, joined by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, which was more narrow in scope, while Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Justice Thomas Cromwell were in dissent and concluded a general warrant was sufficient even for seizure of prospective text messages, because they are stored on the databases of service providers).
I'm not in a position to make that determination, and I understand that
written legal
judgments only reflect a fraction of what actually occurs in the courtroom.
100 % of the Continued Use and Occupancy of your home 100 % of the income tax
write off for interest and property tax 100 % financing at the «real» value of the property 100 % elimination of the over-encumbrance amount 100 % removal of all payment arrearages 100 % elimination of late charges and penalties 100 % removal of negative credit entries related to the former mortgage 100 % of all income derived from renting or leasing the property out during the term 100 % of all future appreciation 100 % of all equity build - up from principal reduction 100 % protection of the property from creditor claims and
judgments 100 % protection of the property from IRS liens 100 % comfort in the knowledge that the homeowners payment is based on
only a 50 % loan, even though his financing is 100 % 100 % no prepayment penalties