I am
writing this under the assumption that Juventus will defeat Hellas Verona, pushing the Scudetto gap to five points (they did, it just takes me a while to hit publish apparently), meaning Roma still has a plausible chance at unseating the Old Lady before the season ends.
These strategies are
written under the assumption that a leader is in place which seeks to change the culture of a school and is willing to work hard.
I've read some of the how - to, and my problem with it is that it seems to be
written under the assumption that the reader understands the technical terminology involved.
Note: This is
written under the assumption that your student loan burden will not increase over time.
This article appears to have been
written under the assumption that we're in for another decade - long console generation, which I think is unlikely... the PS4 and Xbox One have both surpasssed their predecessors in terms of how quickly they've sold, which no - doubt makes repeating (or exceeding) said success a very attractive proposition for their respective manufacturers.
Not exact matches
Under that
assumption, are you thinking your post is so well
written that it can undo hundreds of years of religious indoctrination or is your opinion of Catholics so low that you believe they can be fooled into believing you're one of them but with different information?
The speculation that it was in a «section on preaching to the «half breeds» / Samaritans» might be some handy way someone sections off that section of the book, but to assume every incident within a certain part of scripture is there like a Science book identifying the phylum and genus of an animal, that is, that everything mentioned
under the Raccoon Family is in the Raccoon Family (the ring - tail cat, kinkajou, coatimundi... three other members of the raccoon family), is an
assumption that does not seem to apply to the Bible and how it is
written... it is more human, and living, and not sterile, everything in its tight little unmovable section, etc..
Grossman is wrong, however, if he believes the book was
written under «the naive
assumption that bigots can be reformed by factual evidence.»
As Jill Filipovic
writes in Cosmopolitan, «Pew seems to be operating
under the (not entirely unreasonable)
assumption that men are expected to have jobs to be «marriage material,» while women simply have to exist.»
The second reason is that since this document was likely
written by a representative, the proper handling procedures might have slipped his mind and he put down (U) either as a mistake OR
under the
assumption that nothing would be redacted prior to an intended public release.
This is what the constitution says... And once again as you have alluded, the transitional provisions 14 (1) say on the
assumption of office, those persons specified in the schedule will cease to hold office and it goes further to say in 14 (2) that the functions of office of a person who ceases to hold office
under sub section 1 shall be performed by a person so appointed by the president for the period specified in
writing by the president,» she stated.
«
Under appropriate
assumptions, these facts can be shown to imply a limited role for the Internet and social media in explaining the recent rise in measured political polarization,» the authors
wrote.
Based on experience from phoneticizing similar nonentities into Japanese, she renders it as biburon,
under the fairly safe
assumption that anyone in Japan likely to take notice will recognize the word as vibron
written in phonetic script.
Bernard
wrote; «You are operating
under the
assumption that the clear air
under a vehicle counts as part of the cross-sectional area.»
Given the 1,045 guesses and 535 correct guesses we can say that no statistically significant power to determine gender from
writing has been demonstrated (
under the
assumption both genders were equally represented — they weren't but it doesn't introduce a large effect).
With respect to the latter point, Hinote
writes (bold emphasis added), «All of these channels... are operating
under the
assumption that travelers book vacation homes in the same way that they book hotels.
«In the circular reasoning that has become common in oilsands decision - making,»
wrote the Pembina Institute's Director of Oil Sands Jennifer Grant, «the Panel based its recommendation that the project be approved on the
assumption that the rules would be strengthened, rather than on the likely impacts of the project
under existing regulations.»