Sentences with phrase «written word after»

There are many ways you can introduce the concept of words to your toddler — you could draw a word with a corresponding picture, you could have your toddler practice writing words after you write them, or you could play our family's favorite game of «Snowman.»

Every time I write a review about Toriko, I write word after word about this explosive fun - ride of a manga that is part fighting, part adventure, and part foodie manga, all mixed together to a perfection and unleashed upon the page by the mighty pen of mangaka Shimabukuro.

Not exact matches

I manage to write a few hundred words but sway drunkenly when I step off for lunch, as if disembarking onto the dock after a boat ride.

A few days after Dave's funeral, Sheryl started to journal; and after four or five months she had written over 100,000 words.

Right after midnight on November 9, when Trump was the projected winner, WikiLeaks wrote just one word to Trump Jr.: «Wow.»

The earnings call came a few weeks after Musk wrote a strongly worded email to Tesla employees upping the company's internal goals.

Bill Gates and Paul Allen, after getting started as a services business that wrote operating system software for the then - nascent PC industry, transitioned to selling application software like MS Word and Excel in shrink - wrapped boxes.

«That seminal article was written in The New York Times that coined the word metrosexual, and what that meant for someone like me was that people were starting to recognize that guys in their 20s were caring more about how they looked after the grunge era of the 1990s, where everything was too big — all Kurt Cobain flannels.

I feel very happy to write this email to you that day after day you give very nice advice to those who have signed up with you, without anything in return in monetary terms, especially since I / we never expected such beautiful advices from a stock analyst / stranger and always try to find out the intent behind nice words.

Its only reference to withdrawal is a single 34 - word sentence, Article 2205, which says: A party may withdraw after providing six months» written notice, which means that any president declaring a pullout would simply be allowed to do it six months later.

Writing those four words, after all these years, still triggers almost numbing incredulity.

The evidence indicates that the written sources of our Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are not later than c. AD 60; some of them have even been traced back to notes taken of our Lord's teaching while His words were actually being uttered... We have then in the Synoptic Gospels, the latest of which was complete between 40 - 50 years after the death of Christ, material which took shape at a still earlier time, some of it even before His death, and which, besides being for the most part 1st hand evidence, was transmitted along independent and trustworthy lines.»

Now if you want to get into details here's a few: not a word was written down until at least 60 years after Jesus» death.

But insofar as «Jesus»» word was not written until 70 years after his death — rebirth, whatever, it's doubtful that any person who heard him utter anything at all from his mouth was still alive.

The word used in Hebrews 10:25 is also used in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 where Paul is writing about the ingathering of believers for the Day of the Lord, after which time we will spend eternity with Jesus.

Words written in bible represent mind set of a hindu, secular, crook self centered writer hundreds of years after Easu, anointed one, corresponding not to essence of teachings, but plot to justify hindu Mithra ism, pagan savior ism, in violation of spirit of true teachings.

and I know more than one full professor of English who tell me they are retiring because they have class after class who can not write academic papers... IN OTHER WORDS..

Actually, I think the most accurate would be to state that the anonymous author who wrote the gospel of John attributed those words to Jesus that he or she received second hand (or more) and didn't bother to put into writing until at least many decades after the words were said.

This crap is taken from the «word» of god (Again, written centuries after his death and subject to hundreds of interpretations and language translations from Latin, Italian, Middle English, Modern English, etc.) which you describe as a literal truth.

the primacy given to the written word is predominantly a western european / north american phenomenon — and one that really only took hold after the invention of printing presses and moveable type.

According to the Barna study, the percent of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word of God, but acknowledge it can have some errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent in 2011.

as I write these words, I can not believe I am even admitting this... I am a child of GOD and I know where I am going after my heart quits beating....

That said, I don't know about you, but I can always tell when the slick - sounding press releases are formulated after «the team» gets together for an exhaustive «public statement» strategy session during which every word, phrase, and nuance is carefully considered, debated - over, written and rewritten, and finally aligned - around prior to being released to the general public.

You realize the words under god were added much later, after the original pledge was written right?

After all, we must remember that just as Bible translators let their own theology guide how they translate the Greek text, so also, the people who write Bible Dictionaries let their own theology guide how they define various Greek words.

We are not powerless and fearful, not us: and so I pray and I work; I make coffee in the morning and hot meals to gather around the table at suppertime; I worship and sing out words of promise and praise; I raise children and read good books; I pray for my enemies and write letters and send money and show up to fold clothes and drop off meals with an extra bag of groceries; I advocate with the marginalized and amplify the oppressed and antagonize the Empire with a grin on my face; I will honour those who get after the work of the Kingdom and celebrate; I learn how to listen to those with whom I disagree; I abandon the idea that we can baptize sinful practices in the name of sacred purposes; I will stand in the middle of the field near my house with my face turned up to the rain and consider it a minor baptism.

After that passage which is often read out loud at weddings, Paul writes that someday all of our important and inspired words will end, our praying in tongues will end, our knowledge will end but love will be what lasts forever.

«However, after many, many weeks of wrestling with the question of what to do, I wanted to put it in writing what I have decided, and it's with a heavy, but peaceful heart that I write these words: I have decided to leave Sky at the end of the season.»

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

I simply need to write and honour the work that God has given me to do, right now, to create it, bum in chair, word after word, and make a sacrament of it, day after day after day.

Despite the limping conclusion (he is writing for Commonweal, after all), Steinfels has nailed the mindlessness of a progressive insouciance that thinks it a good thing that, in the words of one author, younger Catholics «place a higher priority on being good Christians than they do on being good Catholics,» when «good Christian» is indistinguishable from the cultural liberalism promoted by, for instance, the National Catholic Reporter.

Even the carpentry of the typewriter table upon which these words are being written (the top was made from an old and discarded wooden organ pipe from Miller Chapel of Princeton Seminary) was something I got into in terms of principles only after I had begun some «functions.»

after rereading what you had written about using relics (statues, cloth or even blood in this case), and your monkeying around with the word pray... do nt give me the latin, how about greek and hebrew?

and please bear in mind that these words are at best hearsay written down decades or centuries after jesus was said to have existed and written by people who had never seen or heard jesus.

Why do Christians on this blog persist in posting that «jesus said this» or «jesus said that» when any words attributed to jesus in the bible are at best unverifiable hearsay written down decades or centuries after jesus was said to have existed and written by people who had never seen or heard jesus.

However, being an atheist I do not believe in god and can not see why people want to take serious a fairy tale written and misinterpreted so, many ways like it was passed down through word of mouth and was not translated until 400 years after the original language became extinct never mind that regards of the accuracy it was still written by a human.

The writing that most clearly and prominently displays the heart of this integration, however, is his Liber regulae pastoralis (literally Book of Pastoral Guidance), often translated as Pastoral Care after the first two words of the text (Pastorolis curae) or asPastoralia or Concerning Pastoral Care (De pastorali cura).

I other words, if John the Mediocre's activities were recorded as they happened but Jane the Magnificent's activities didn't get written down for 5 years after the fact, then even with copy errors and such, John's docu.mentation may be more reliable even if the earliest known docu.ment is more recent that Jane's earliest.

Uh... those words that you dearly love weren't written down until decades after «Jesus» supposedly lived and according to many many scholars nowadays much of the «Gospel» is made up or recycled from earlier mythical gods.

I hate to say «who decides the doctrinal teachings of the church» (even tho that's what I think it is) because the word ««doctrine» has taken on unnecessary baggage (after all, what you wrote is «doctrine» — doctrine in itself ain't bad — it's what we do with it).

The word would be used to describe everything from a personal note (written and passed to another), a receipt of an item purchased, a person's will after death etc..

sam stone «i suspect most of the words attributed to jesus were written by someone else long after he was dead» = > yes written by someone else but shortly after his resurrection about 20 years later.

They wrote «the word of God» hundreds of years after the death of Jesus Christ.

CNN: My Take: Counting the Bible's words doesn't yield a Republican Jesus Stephen Prothero, Boston University religion scholar and author of «The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» responds to angry emails he received after writing a Belief Blog post in which he takes issue with evangelicals using Jesus as a political tool to benefit the Republican Pwords doesn't yield a Republican Jesus Stephen Prothero, Boston University religion scholar and author of «The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» responds to angry emails he received after writing a Belief Blog post in which he takes issue with evangelicals using Jesus as a political tool to benefit the Republican PWords Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» responds to angry emails he received after writing a Belief Blog post in which he takes issue with evangelicals using Jesus as a political tool to benefit the Republican Party.

He sat at the table after breakfast and after some reflection he wrote on the table with chalk: «Substance and words — Philip.

There are many commentaries out there that were written after Ezra's reading of the Torah to the returning Exiles that have fought with the texts, trying to determine the meaning of the words, the glorification of violence and the various laws.

He could very easily said something like... «My wife, the church, should be embraced by you as it was by me» OR he could have said «My wife, Mary, is a royal pain in the @ $ $» OR since the writing is from 150 yrs after he died Jesus might not have said anything of the sort and the writer was attributing words to him.

This sequence bookends a powerful opening, in which Berry muses about the flawed «objective» of modern life, with words written after a Sabbath walk some twenty years ago.

The prophecy past, present that have come to pass and the future which you can look and see after reading his word and know He is GOD and had a heavy hand in on it's writing.

After the coming of the Word, the written words of the New Testament attest to His presence and teaching.