You are the one who finds it necessary to deny the truth because that would mean that you were
wrong about gays.
Anyone who can not consider for a moment that they might be
wrong about something is dangerous.
Which makes them neither right nor
wrong about their belief.
So go on, just say that you are sorry and that in this case you are
wrong about this.
Topher, you are quite amusing, you were
wrong about the diversity of races but will not admit it, pathetic.
He is the only one who can «prove the world to be in
the wrong about sin and righteousness and judgment».
I will take that one step further and say if the Bible is
wrong about one doctrinal point then it looses all credibality.
With tongue slightly in cheek he remarks, «I used to believe that everything I believe, Aquinas also believed, but now I realize that Aquinas was
wrong about a few things.»
Regardless of what you experience, anybody any day could suddenly say, hey, Newton was
wrong about the reason for gravitational pull, show why, and everyone would have to toss this idea and figure out what is really «true.»
I'm no Graham fan but you're dead
wrong about Graham on civil rights.
Yes, Swindoll was «EVFree» when he was in Fullerton, CA, but I don't think Stonebriar is EVFree, though I could be
wrong about that.
So not only are
you wrong about gays and lesbians, you are also wrong about the United States.
You assume too much and I wonder how google is doing for you cause i can't picture you picking up a bible to try and prove
me wrong about these.
She's not
wrong about Iceland's liberal bent — Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurdardóttir is the world's first openly lesbian head of state — but the country's history of curtailing pornography is storied.
So what would have been so
wrong about that?
I think we do it mainly when we are afraid we might be
wrong about our own beliefs, even if we won't admit it to ourselves.
As it is accepted that most of the ecclesiastical and scientific authorities, backed by the papacy, were
wrong about Galileo.
Also, if everyone on this thread is so convinced that faithful Christians are
wrong about this issue (laughably wrong nonetheless) why does it bother them so much when Christians express their view?
If you want follow Rand, you really have to either reject Christianity or admit she could be totally
wrong about certain things.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox News could not be
wrong about this, could they?
All of you who want to sit here and say no
your wrong about your version of what caused the universe to begin have no authority to do so... you just don't know.
However, if you consider that when your brain stops functioning, your thought life ceases to exist, then there will be no way to know that you were
wrong about your god belief.
Maybe I am
wrong about this.
Second, Jon is
wrong about what Pennsylvania law says on late - term abortions.
from the original articles suggests that you are at least partially
wrong about the potential implications of this discovery.
What I think, (and I think this is what the people in the article believe too, but I could be
wrong about that), is that sports are great, and yes diversions are good.
James — «Labelling people makes it easier to dismiss them... when we are afraid we might be
wrong about our own beliefs... simple laziness.»
If an «inerrant» book can be proven to be
wrong about many things contained within, why should we then believe the god it describes actually exists?
He got 3 things completely
wrong about me within the first 5 lines of his 1,000 + word essay.
they simply can't accept that they were initially
wrong about you, and will fight tooth and nail to maintain the pretense of their infallibility.
It may have been
wrong about the operations of memory and the precise guilt of specific men — but it was not a witch hunt, for its critique of patriarchy was conceptually sound.
You make it sound as if there is something
wrong about being afraid of sniper fire.
Either administering is an essential mode of ministry of the Word, or else the Reformers were entirely
wrong about universal priesthood and Christian vocation.
He says you're also
wrong about the economic woes of this nation — we are in a WORLD - WIDE RECESSION, fred.
While the first person might be
wrong about the nature of Jesus, the second person is completely
wrong about everything related to Jesus, for if they think that Jesus wants them to burn people who don't understand Him, they haven't understood the first thing about Him, and should incinerate themselves first.
I, for one, would prefer to believe that the church is
wrong about homosexual activity than that this sadistic, superego God has any true relation to the God of love revealed by Jesus.
I wish I were
wrong about the troubled state of American conservatism.
I was
wrong about her and her husband and that is something I have to live with.
And if you don't know who or what the cause is, then you likewise don't know that theists are
wrong about who or what the cause is.
The problem is what if Christians are
wrong about WHICH god is real?
(Rest assured, we are not
wrong about Jesus Christ... just saying to think about it)
There are a list of 101 Reasons why you're
wrong about the flood story here: http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/chapter6.html
Actually, you are completely
wrong about who the Koran thinks of as pagans.
«This is a prime example, how the hell could all the scholars down through the ages be
wrong about Sodom and Gomorrah?»
They need to check out the possibility that they are not only
wrong about this event, but everything else as well.
Forgive me if I'm
wrong about the origins but don't you think that a «monkey» is implied due to the original use of «hear no evil, speak no evil» even if she isn't drawn as one?
An actual scientist will go where the evidence leads, and if it proves the Bible
wrong about something then the Bible is wrong.
I haven't been
wrong about anything.
It demands recognizing that you might be
wrong about God.