Sentences with phrase «wrong about the prediction»

While they were wrong about their prediction on the score, they did say the A's would win via walkoff, they just said 3 - 2 though.

For his part, Ishihara now admits he's obviously wrong about that prediction.

For his part, Ishihara now admits he's obviously wrong about that prediction.

Not exact matches

A significant portion of the TSC hearing focused on Haldane's now famous Fish comment, as well as broader issues with economic forecasting — something that has come to the fore in the UK since economists were almost unanimously wrong in their predictions about the immediate impact of Brexit on the British economy.

They talk about getting up to 3 or 4 %, which looks unlikely given that 10 year rates are at 2 % and as you pointed out their predictions of 10 year rates increasing have always been wrong.

And about all its major social predictions, the 1970s abortion lobby turns out to have been wrong.

Chapter 7 deals with a famous textual issue of whether David actually killed Goliath or not (cf. 2 Sam 21:19), and chapter 8 makes the case that Jesus was wrong in many of His predictions about the future.

To remedy this distortion, balance the picture of the priest pleading for mercy with the image of a child, terrified and crying when our predictions about the man's future good behavior turn out wrong.

This leads him to his key point: «Let us make no mistake; the data we now have at hand should serve as a dire warning: Unless we act decisively, many of today's converts will be one - generation Jews — Jews with non-Jewish parents and non-Jewish children,» But Sarna concludes on a note that most Jews would find more hopeful: «Learned Jews and non-Jews have been making dire predictions about the future (or end) of the Jewish people for literally thousands of years — long before William Wirt and long after him — and, as we have seen, their predictions have proved consistently wrong.

religion has been wrong about all its other predictions, and most certainly wrong about this one as well.

I will be wrong about some prospects, right about others, and you have every right to call me out when one of my predictions doesn't come true in either direction.

Even with this case, the only reason the wrong predictions are being brought up is because Barkley has been consistently wrong about the Celtics and the context is his bias against the Celtics rather than him just being wrong.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's a solid dependable prediction and the best thing about it is, if it's wrong there won't be anyone around to say so.

The findings suggest that polar bears may just prove wrong those gloomy predictions about their ability to survive.

Forecasters ought to be just as embarrassed about no prediction as they would be about a wrong one.

This was meant to prevent situations like the one created by COMPAS, which made wrong predictions about black and white defendants at different rates.

«There are lot of knobs in those models that have to be tuned to describe reality,» Wehr says, «and if you have the wrong idea about what forests have been doing, then you turn the knobs wrong and your predictions will be off.»

``... most every prediction by theorists about planetary formation has been wrong.»

So what can the Northwest Climate Toolbox tell us about this year's fire season and where earlier predictions might have gone wrong?

Collector's Edition DVD Review: My predictions about a special edition DVD being released later in the year may have been dead on, but I couldn't have been any more wrong about the actual content that appears.

In the case of Piaget, many predictions derived from his theory were wrong, including the prediction about young children's limited ability to think abstractly.

I should mention, however, that more than any previous year when I've made these predictions, I could well be 100 % wrong about every last one of these choices.

It's better to be quiet and wrong, than loud about predictions as accurate as predicting next week's lottery.

However, EMH theorists counter that while EMH makes a precise prediction about a market based upon the data, BF usually does not go beyond saying that EMH is wrong.

But as Ian Ayres recounts in his great book Supercrunchers, Ashenfelter was right and Parker wrong about the «86 vintage, and the way - out - on - a-limb predictions Ashenfelter made about the sublime quality of the «89 and «90 wines turned out to be spot on.

Not only Pachter was wrong, his prediction about the end of the consoles now sounds absolutely ridiculous.

We talk about what Pachter has to say all the time but when his predictions go wrong, I don't see the internet paying any attention; so why don't we discuss that today?

In the last couple of months, «we» provided enough evidence that Derek Smart is frequently wrong about almost all of his predictions and claims about StarCitizen and Squadron 42.

Keep reading to remember just how wrong we were with our initial predictions about what Nintendo Labo would be.

Also, Roy and / or Ryu confirmed as DLC characters (I may have been wrong about my Ice Climbers prediction, but if the Roy and Ryu rumor is true, I'll be MUCH happier).

Mcintyre is now saying that his prediction was «conditional», as if this somehow changes Gavin's point about wild speculation being wrong — in fact, it only adds to point.

Predictions about more hurricanes, for example, are likely to prove wrong.

Tell me if I'm wrong, but I believe that as of this moment there is essentially no written research in the field regarding the 2004 season (which has only been over for a few months), and the current TAR could not have made any prediction about 2004 since it was written several years before (and in fact is essentially neutral on the matter).

The IPCC's 2007 figures are lower that its 2001 predictions and this, says Hansen, has sent the wrong message to the public giving an impression that scientists are now less concerned about sea level rises.

One of the authors, Professor Michael Grubb of University College London, admitted past predictions were wrong, and that he had changed his mind about the timescales involved in man - made climate change.

If you were to produce a chaotic model using the above, I would venture a prediction that the above former were the massive attractors about which we could make some decent predictions about the future but that the latter human produced CO2 inserted into our atmosphere would leave us with hopelessly inadequate and wrong predictions because CO2 contributed by man is not an attractor of any significance in the chaotic Earth climate system nor is CO2 produced by man a perturbation that would yield any predictive ability.

They are stating that all of the predictions from the last couple of years about global warming causing all of this crazy weather are all wrong.

Hunter, Who cares about idiotically wrong predictions about peak oil?

This is not black or white, because the prediction may be approximately correct for some variables and wrong for some other variables, and because one can distinguish different degrees of beliefs about the likelihood that a prediction will (or might) come true [very uncertain, possible, very unlikely,..

Newsbytes from the GWPF, Lies, Damn Lies And Green Statistics Almost all predictions about the expansion and cost of German wind turbines and solar panels have turned out to be wrong — at least by a factor of two, sometimes by a factor of five.

Certainly all the NASA and UK Met model predictions about completely ice free by 2011 / 2013/2015 have already been proven grossly wrong.

Rud Istvan confabulates «Certainly all the NASA and UK Met model predictions about completely ice free by 2011 / 2013/2015 have already been proven grossly wrong.»

An ingenious theory, but the model set out in that paper seems to make predictions about what would happend to surface temperature if CO ₂ concentration were to vary which are out of kilter with empirical measurements by several orders of magitude in timescale and at least one order of magnitude and possibly the wrong sign in temperature.

Mark Bahner keeps on ranting about how the IPCC «predictions» for GHGs are wrong.

They literally can not believe they might be wrong about their future predictions — and can not understand how any rational person could not see the future with the same blinders they wear.

The great thing about this area is not you can never been wrong, because you can claim your prediction did not fail its just be delayed in effect.

So if you are genuinely serious about wanting to evaluation the skill of the prediction, you use scenario B. Scenario A is just wrong; and manaker's statements about the data — even the emissions, let alone the model input — are incorrect.

Seems to me that the point at which you should crow about predictions of future temperatures being wrong is the point at which any known magnitude of year - to - year fluctuation (anomalies?)

The Mercer (1978) ``... a threat of disaster» paper introduced above was fraught with presumptions, guesswork, and spectacularly wrong predictions about the connections between fossil fuel consumption by humans and future carbon dioxide (CO2) parts per million (ppm) concentrations, the melting of polar ice sheets, and an impeding sea level rise disaster.