Sentences with phrase «wrong about your interpretation»

It is just your interpretation of God's will, so don't be so presumptous to speak for God when you could be wrong about your interpretation and be misleading millions just like Camping, making yourself into the very person you opposed and judged.

Second, you couldnt be more wrong about your interpretation of Charles» denomination.

people here are wrong about their interpretation.

And while I may be wrong about my interpretation of your incorrect use of the Razor, I don't think so.

Not exact matches

Rationalizations, compromising, wrong interpretations, not taking the Bible literally, and outright lying about what it says is what they tempt the pipers to do.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

For that reason, even when I found myself wondering about the interpretation of certain texts and mentally entertaining the idea that I could be wrong and that maybe this really is sinful, I have never felt any real uncertainty or doubt about what I am doing.

Bob, again you are talking about yourself, it's perfectly clear that you really don't even understand the bible or Christian history, which is why your interpretation of the bible is wrong.

Which leads me to ask,» If we can be wrong in our interpretation, why can't they be wrong as well», and» Are we justified in presupposing a doctrine about scripture that conveniently steers us away from «that road less travelled»?.»

I don't see anything wrong with the cartoon — to me it says something about Christian interpretation of the bible — in colors of greens and reds when it was using blues and whiites (metaphor).

Under the circumstances, it is easy for me to understand how the chapter on the double holdout could wind up as just about the most jumbled history of any financial dealing I have ever read, full of wrong data, wrong amounts, wrong conclusions, wrong interpretations.

I'm quite fine with people being confused about what a person means, but if you can't point to something wrong with the interpretation I offered, there is no basis for these criticisms of Andrew Lacis.

Your interpretation about my «attitudes» is entirely your own — it isn't relevant to speak of them as being «wrong» or «right.»

Currently, he's critiquing the dissent («gets just about everything wrong») in a stem - cell case he's involved in that «turns to a great extent on questions of textual interpretation».

«I think part of the problem with the terminology is people don't always understand it or they have the wrong interpretation of what something means, so if what we're talking about is decision - making, why don't we actually use terms to describe what is happening and call it shared decision - making or primary decision - making?»

Instead of simply telling our children that their conclusions are wrong, we can ask them if they have considered alternative interpretations, or we can tell them what we think about when we make conclusions.