Sentences with phrase «wrong answer if»

There is no right or wrong answer if you would like to use it in both areas.

When asked to make simple perceptual decisions such as matching up a shape with its rotated image, for instance, people will often choose a definitively wrong answer if they see others doing the same.

«Epidemiologic studies can get the wrong answer if there are differences between people who take the drug and people who don't take the drug,» said Hennessy, who is also a Leonard David Institute of Health Economics senior fellow.

I usually can eliminate all or most wrong answers if I don't already know the answer.

Not exact matches

If you can not answer the question, then you are probably solving the wrong things.

«Worst day» answers tell whether a person is a team player — if their response focuses on what went wrong without taking any ownership, there is a good chance they won't thrive in a collaborative environment.»

If you answered 140 characters, you're wrong.

This is especially useful if you got an answer wrong due to a typo or auto - correct change.

If you answered yes, you're just plain wrong.

Modern workers are accustomed to emailing for answers, or believe an electronic trail is some kind of insurance if something goes wrong.

You try to figure out if you did something wrong, but they won't give you any clear answers.

If you answered no to this science trivia question, you're wrong.

When property prices were booming, I'd sometimes wonder if I'd made the wrong decision by deciding to go it alone — even though I know that working a nine - to - five in an office and answering to some buffoon of a manager would kill me.

If you answered that the government of your country will give everyone free bitcoin mining gear, you would have been wrong.

If you answered social media, you're wrong.

They have the answers... its right there in black and white in their bibles in the only anointed translation and if you can't read and know you're wrong they are going to tell you.

If you think atheism have all the answers well you're wrong, they sure don't when it comes to certain values.

You keep your angry condescending replies up by focusing on semantics and syntax, to avoid answering the question, so if the word belief is wrong then give me a proper defended understanding

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

If not I understand missing more of them since multiple guess jogs the memory and limits possible wrong answers.

If we ask ourselves, «what is wrong with the world today,» our first answer should be: we are.

I don't have any answers, but from all the reading I've done, I realize that Christian culture contributes to this greatly, as we are told that standing up for ourselves isn't kind, and that confrontation and dissent is wrong if may hurt others.

If I were a traditionalist Catholic, I would ask Wuthnow these questions: What is wrong with «ready - made» answers?

Why will always be the wrong question when it comes to God stuff, and when we receive an answer we still say «Yes but» or «yes but what if».

If someone can not further explain an answer without being accused of attempting to change their «wrong» answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

If we are completely honest with ourselves (and with the Old Testament text), I think the answer we give to the question «Is it wrong to call God Allah?»

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

The only slightly challenging question was about the First Great Awakening (Jonathan Edwards - if I had to write the name from memory, I would have likely answered wrong as I always want to say George Edwards... and Jonathan Whitefield).

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

You raised some genetic doubts about that process and I can't answer that (so far) as I don't have the knowledge, so I don't know if they are right or wrong.

thats wrong and the men that are behind this will have to answer to a higher authority, if they follow through with this.

But if you ask them «Was the teaching that said the dark races are cursed were wrong and a mistake and an error» Answer is «No it was not an error, it was a teaching from God but God had a change and informed the Church» Very wrong teaching absolutely wrong an American teaching

All religions provide answers, but if you go back and reread the texts of any religion, they don't make sense in this day and age, but science, and academic study has shown much of it to be wrong.

I heard it asked what if you are wrong to a Christian, the answer nothing.

Is it wrong to wonder if the mystery of God may hold other answers?

(As a side note: If your answer to these questions is «Not one bit» there is something seriously wrong with you.)

If I am wrong in the definition then tell me.Am I wrong why wont you answer this?

Even if we can not know the answer to all of society's ills, even if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems of crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead of rehabilitation; to allow human rights violations to go unchallenged (on either side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.

Sorry... If you can't see that answers in genesis is flat out wrong in many places.

In answer to the criticism that WCC is syncretistic because of its program for inter-religious dialogue, Thomas said that if the word syncretism denotes all processes of interpenetration between cultures and religions, the only answer to a wrong syncretism, which means the uncritical, superficial, normless mixing of basically incompatible religious concepts and cultural attitudes, is a Christ - centered syncretism which grapples with and evaluates all concepts and attitudes critically in the light of Jesus Christ and converts them into vehicles for communicating the truth of the Gospel and for expressing its meaning for life.

And what is at stake in these questions — what, exactly, is endangered if we get the answers wrong?

If research didn't involve putting down the bible then I'm sorry my friend but you are looking for the right answers in the wrong place lol

Also if how in the world would anyone know that that answer you recieved from GOD for a prayer you prayed is the wrong answer?

What does it say about you if you answer, «No, I could NOT be wrong»?

If he gives you the wrong answer that is His fault, not yours.»

From my perspective, nothing is wrong with having the answer, but is the answer true, or can we KNOW (at this moment in time) if the answer is true, or what the answer is?

But I cant help but wonder if I knew what was going wrong in my old church, is leaving the answer?

Many people have a wrong view of history, God, and human nature so if you want real answers as to why death, suffering, and evil exist read this http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/radio/death-and-suffering.pdf

Is there anything wrong with that — short answer, no, If the ending is good then should I really worry about the journey?