Sentences with phrase «wrong answer when»

I gave the wrong answer when I was ambushed with a salary question.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to which type is best for you.

There is really no right or wrong answer when it comes to where you buy life insurance.

There is no right or wrong answer when choosing your provider; the most important thing is that you are comfortable with their services and confident in their support.

While there's no right or wrong answer when it comes to choosing your deductible, there are some general rules you'll want to consider following in order to select the amount that's right for you.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to this question, it depends on your personal circumstances.

«I don't think there is a right or wrong answer when it comes to notebooks.

The prosecutor that shows up in every 1st case is a Payne, and he gets his hair blown off... Selecting the obviously wrong answer when asked.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to the ideal budget for full - time travel.

There's no right or wrong answer when it comes down to investing, your student loans, or your money.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to which type is best for you.

Lastly, it is important to recognize that there is no right or wrong answer when it comes to goal priority.

As long as the text on your site and in your graphics is legible and aesthetically pleasing, there is no wrong answer when it comes to the question of what font you'd like to use on your author website.

«Without reproducing this size distribution for the right reasons, models are likely to get the wrong answer when used to predict into the future,» Farrior said.

There's no right or wrong answer when it comes to which one is best.

There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to whether to buy a basic or convertible crib.

There's no right or wrong answer when it comes to franchising.

I don't think there are universally right and wrong answers when it comes to leverage in retirement.

Keep in mind that there are really no right or wrong answers when it comes to which type is best for you and your family.

Not exact matches

«This result showed that when the students had lots of connections to peers they could recognise where they had given a wrong answer and swap it for the right one.»

In this week's column, our Team Digital answers: When it comes to SEO, what are most business owners doing wrong?

The question - and - answer site Quora recently elicited a thread full of thoughtful, clear - eyed, and actionable answers to the question What are Millennials doing wrong when it comes to their careers?»

When property prices were booming, I'd sometimes wonder if I'd made the wrong decision by deciding to go it alone — even though I know that working a nine - to - five in an office and answering to some buffoon of a manager would kill me.

The answer is none its only wrong when it's a «Christian Event» isn't it?

If you think atheism have all the answers well you're wrong, they sure don't when it comes to certain values.

«It is sad that a man would look to a thousand year old book to tell him right from wrong, when the real answers are written in the man's own heart.»

For example, when I was in school in the late 70s, early 80s there was no doubt that the Universe was 28 Billion years old, any other answer would be wrong.

Especially when u get the wrong answers.

Why will always be the wrong question when it comes to God stuff, and when we receive an answer we still say «Yes but» or «yes but what if».

You can start with simple things like answering the questions, staying on subject and recognizing when you are wrong.

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

It's never wrong to ask for the particulars, but even when we ask, we need to know that He may or may not give us the answers.

The seven - year - old child climbs right in somehow and curls up in a ball and doesn't answer when I ask what's wrong.

Opening the phone book to «Churches» and blindly pointing to one is not the answer — this is not the time for your fingers to do the walking — but neither is bouncing to a new church when something rubs you the wrong way.

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

But when God is conspicuously silent on an issue, maybe the reason isn't that you're asking the wrong question or not listening hard enough, but maybe it's that He's already given an answer.

Seriously, I remember when I was in college, there would be these people, called professors, that would even say my answer is wrong and give me points off my test... the nerve of them how dare they not be open to my ideas and beliefs as to how physics work, or what Poe point was, or what actually happen during Roman occupation....

When your theological presuppositions raise the wrong questions, you get the wrong answers.

that was the best evidence... rather than cause someone told me so... thus no man can prove me wrong or convince me to change... I will answer more tonight when I return home

When I honestly looked at the evidence of my life, my relationships, my internal condition [how I walked around experiencing the world], I saw that perhaps I was wrong, at least didn't have all the answers.

When ending your life becomes the better answer, or the better solution, something is wrong.»

The confusion for me, again even as a little kid (ages 9 - 11 particularly, at a time when I was quite the believer even), was that all the other religions pretty much said the same thing... prayers answered, miracle cures, and with the same back up, that «unanswered» prayers were either an answer, «no» or «not yet»... OR... the person asking didn't have the right heart, or didn't ask for the right thing, or asked the wrong way, etc..

«So what is wrong with a question» — especially when it is the question, the question we were meant to answer with our very lives?

When I asked him what was wrong, he answered «I'm not little anymore.»

The questions also didn't attempt to ask what kind of job at that business would be right / wrong to do... When I answered the survey, I automatically thought of working at the strip club to mean being a stripper or perhaps a bartender.

So, you basically set up a «no wrong answers» array of choices, let them make their own oatmeal mix, and when you cook it for them in the mornings, you can remind them that they «made» their own breakfast!

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

Recently when ever i watch AW on TV giving an interview i don't know weather to laugh or vote for him for the next president of France, he has become to arrogant, predictable robot like with his answers but most of all his undermining his supporters treating them like Children who don't understand, its possible you can do this if your decisions or play is always correct but to fail and pretend it like its anything ells but a failure is wrong, Arsen man up and say we fuc ed up and show your disappointment at players who are not giving all or just sub them if they are having a bad day its normal,

So why do people keep defending a man who is obviously holding the club back by continuing to get it so wrong when the answer is obvious.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits