I usually can eliminate all or most
wrong answers if I don't already know the answer.
«Epidemiologic studies can get
the wrong answer if there are differences between people who take the drug and people who don't take the drug,» said Hennessy, who is also a Leonard David Institute of Health Economics senior fellow.
When asked to make simple perceptual decisions such as matching up a shape with its rotated image, for instance, people will often choose a definitively
wrong answer if they see others doing the same.
There is no right or
wrong answer if you would like to use it in both areas.
Not exact matches
If you can not
answer the question, then you are probably solving the
wrong things.
«Worst day»
answers tell whether a person is a team player —
if their response focuses on what went
wrong without taking any ownership, there is a good chance they won't thrive in a collaborative environment.»
If you
answered 140 characters, you're
wrong.
This is especially useful
if you got an
answer wrong due to a typo or auto - correct change.
If you
answered yes, you're just plain
wrong.
Modern workers are accustomed to emailing for
answers, or believe an electronic trail is some kind of insurance
if something goes
wrong.
You try to figure out
if you did something
wrong, but they won't give you any clear
answers.
If you
answered no to this science trivia question, you're
wrong.
When property prices were booming, I'd sometimes wonder
if I'd made the
wrong decision by deciding to go it alone — even though I know that working a nine - to - five in an office and
answering to some buffoon of a manager would kill me.
If you
answered that the government of your country will give everyone free bitcoin mining gear, you would have been
wrong.
If you
answered social media, you're
wrong.
They have the
answers... its right there in black and white in their bibles in the only anointed translation and
if you can't read and know you're
wrong they are going to tell you.
If you think atheism have all the
answers well you're
wrong, they sure don't when it comes to certain values.
You keep your angry condescending replies up by focusing on semantics and syntax, to avoid
answering the question, so
if the word belief is
wrong then give me a proper defended understanding
anyway,
if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your
answer seem
wrong then they are
wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.
If not I understand missing more of them since multiple guess jogs the memory and limits possible
wrong answers.
If we ask ourselves, «what is
wrong with the world today,» our first
answer should be: we are.
I don't have any
answers, but from all the reading I've done, I realize that Christian culture contributes to this greatly, as we are told that standing up for ourselves isn't kind, and that confrontation and dissent is
wrong if may hurt others.
If I were a traditionalist Catholic, I would ask Wuthnow these questions: What is
wrong with «ready - made»
answers?
Why will always be the
wrong question when it comes to God stuff, and when we receive an
answer we still say «Yes but» or «yes but what
if».
If someone can not further explain an
answer without being accused of attempting to change their «
wrong»
answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»
scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you
if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and
if hes doing
wrong by gods word than he has to
answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.
If we are completely honest with ourselves (and with the Old Testament text), I think the
answer we give to the question «Is it
wrong to call God Allah?»
Jeremy Myers, i think you are
wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us,
if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things
if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent,
if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think,
if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the
wrong way,, and those preachers will
answer to God for leading these people the
wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,
The only slightly challenging question was about the First Great Awakening (Jonathan Edwards -
if I had to write the name from memory, I would have likely
answered wrong as I always want to say George Edwards... and Jonathan Whitefield).
The
answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the
wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially
if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.
You raised some genetic doubts about that process and I can't
answer that (so far) as I don't have the knowledge, so I don't know
if they are right or
wrong.
thats
wrong and the men that are behind this will have to
answer to a higher authority,
if they follow through with this.
But
if you ask them «Was the teaching that said the dark races are cursed were
wrong and a mistake and an error»
Answer is «No it was not an error, it was a teaching from God but God had a change and informed the Church» Very
wrong teaching absolutely
wrong an American teaching
All religions provide
answers, but
if you go back and reread the texts of any religion, they don't make sense in this day and age, but science, and academic study has shown much of it to be
wrong.
I heard it asked what
if you are
wrong to a Christian, the
answer nothing.
Is it
wrong to wonder
if the mystery of God may hold other
answers?
(As a side note:
If your
answer to these questions is «Not one bit» there is something seriously
wrong with you.)
If I am
wrong in the definition then tell me.Am I
wrong why wont you
answer this?
Even
if we can not know the
answer to all of society's ills, even
if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems of crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral
wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead of rehabilitation; to allow human rights violations to go unchallenged (on either side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.
Sorry...
If you can't see that
answers in genesis is flat out
wrong in many places.
In
answer to the criticism that WCC is syncretistic because of its program for inter-religious dialogue, Thomas said that
if the word syncretism denotes all processes of interpenetration between cultures and religions, the only
answer to a
wrong syncretism, which means the uncritical, superficial, normless mixing of basically incompatible religious concepts and cultural attitudes, is a Christ - centered syncretism which grapples with and evaluates all concepts and attitudes critically in the light of Jesus Christ and converts them into vehicles for communicating the truth of the Gospel and for expressing its meaning for life.
And what is at stake in these questions — what, exactly, is endangered
if we get the
answers wrong?
If research didn't involve putting down the bible then I'm sorry my friend but you are looking for the right
answers in the
wrong place lol
Also
if how in the world would anyone know that that
answer you recieved from GOD for a prayer you prayed is the
wrong answer?
What does it say about you
if you
answer, «No, I could NOT be
wrong»?
If he gives you the
wrong answer that is His fault, not yours.»
From my perspective, nothing is
wrong with having the
answer, but is the
answer true, or can we KNOW (at this moment in time)
if the
answer is true, or what the
answer is?
But I cant help but wonder
if I knew what was going
wrong in my old church, is leaving the
answer?
Many people have a
wrong view of history, God, and human nature so
if you want real
answers as to why death, suffering, and evil exist read this http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/radio/death-and-suffering.pdf
Is there anything
wrong with that — short
answer, no,
If the ending is good then should I really worry about the journey?