That argument has finally gone the way of the dodo because there are too many of us out there in the trenches who know just
how wrong that argument is and we've been letting others know.
and youre using what you know of for THIS life here on earth... your arguments don't work... they are
wrong arguments..
Fundamentalist Chrsitians made a big mistake with this intelligent design nonsense — it's
the wrong argument.
This isn't a republican / democrat argument it's a right or
wrong argument.
Are
they wrong arguments then?
Because if he has
a wrong argument, he'll be the first to concede.»
People who say that readers are getting too much email and that mailing lists will stop working are using
the wrong argument to draw the wrong conclusion.
Why Masturbation Is Not Forbidden In Islam: Dispelling
The Wrong Arguments That Have Plagued For Centuries On Masturbation
I'm late to this discussion but I feel very strongly that we're making
the wrong arguments and definitely a boycott is exactly the wrong approach to take.
It is a common pitfall i see with the greenhouse gas debate — people seem to latch on to
the wrong arguments.
You are defending
the wrong argument.
It's more that I think it's
the wrong argument.
I wonder know if this was
the wrong argument and that with the advent of web 2.0 it is not the form of the intellectual content so much, as how the content can be used in more creative ways.