What mistakes or
wrong assumptions did you make with the marketing of your first book?
Not exact matches
These
assumptions are
wrong, and it's time we pay as much attention to the mental health of organizational leaders as we
do their employees — if not more.
Basically, the argument was, if you're going to spend decades with a person you're going to miscommunicate, you're going to misunderstand each other, you're going to have situations where you don't get where the other person is coming from or you make the
wrong assumptions.
At the heart of the dispute, according to the court documents, is the fact that Silent Circle has struggled to sell the Blackphone, with its failure associated with
wrong assumptions of demand for the privacy - focused smartphone and partnerships that
did not push through.
If those
assumptions disappoint and it becomes clear that profit margins will not be forever sustained at record highs, it doesn't only imply near - term earnings disappointments - it implies that the whole stream of future earnings impounded into stock prices is
wrong.
Although you make several
wrong assumptions about a person you know absolutely nothing about, I
did press on to the end.
The first
wrong assumption is that a large number of Christians are able to dictate to God what He should
do.
Examples of this would be our presupposition that it is better to
do right than to
do wrong, or a general
assumption on how to distinguish one from the other.
For example, when Mark says that war / conflict is inevitable, I would agree with your argument that if it is absolutely
wrong to ever go to war, then Christians should still refuse to
do so even if other people are going to — except that I don't agree with your
assumption that it is absolutely
wrong to ever go to war.
Your
assumption that atheists
do not contribute to the community is
wrong.
Of course, that
does not prove that the
assumption of self - enclosedness is
wrong, but it opens up the possibility of reconsideration.
But as McFague has said, «for theology to
do less than fit our present understanding — for it to accept basic
assumptions about reality from a very different time — seems blatantly
wrong - headed» (McFague, 14).
Just because we make
assumptions (and are
wrong),
does not mean that God is «dead», or the Bible is untrue.
It took me a long time to realize that not only
did these
assumptions misrepresented the teachings of the Catholic Church, but they contributed to that common narrative that plagues much of evangelicalism — that people are damned for having the «
wrong» doctrine (and by «
wrong,» I mean «not evangelical.»)
My
assumption is that when God
does justice he begins a process of setting things right.The
wrong God aims to set right, I have been suggesting, is a failure to....
With due respect to your opinion mate I don't need to listen to Wenger or make
assumptions to know what's
wrong with our beloved club, come on open your eyes man!!!
And they are
wrong to
do so and they are making false
assumptions.
These
assumptions can leave many mothers thinking that their skinny baby is skinny because of them; that they're
doing something
wrong; that there must be an important step in feeding their kid that they're somehow skipping; that their baby isn't healthy when, truth be told, they are.
But instead of prosecuting those involved and starting an investigation into other schools which might be suspected of
wrong doing, the Home Office proceeded on the
assumption that everyone nationwide who had
done the government - recommended TOEIC test had committed fraud.
«We have no doubt that the government will continue to plough ahead with HS2 despite PAC's devastating criticism - that there is no convincing strategic case and out - of - date information and
wrong assumptions were used which
do not reflect real life,» Hilary Wharf.
The implicit
assumption is that we don't posit that there is a «right» or «
wrong» vote, or that the outcome was
wrong because they «should have thought differently».
He says: «The
assumption that the Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg having consolidated a centre right hold on the party is preparing to
do a deal with the Tories is
wrong.»
Researchers already knew that some Europeans of this time had dark skin and blue eyes, but Cheddar Man reveals that previous
assumptions that early inhabitants of the British Isles had lighter skin and hair were
wrong — and that those traits didn't spread through England until the past 4800 years or so.
Only then
did she find out her
assumption was
wrong: lower - scoring students had a choice; top exam scorers were assigned to labs.
The only evidence that supports this position is statistical (they
do not offer a plausible physiologic mechanism), and their statistical work is seriously flawed by
wrong assumptions and confounding variables.
Most often these
assumptions are that the person views things the same way that you
do, which is more than likely
wrong since we don't get context and tone in text messages or email.
In Sir Robert's chambers Desmond explains their predicament: the legal
assumption is that the Admiralty and the Crown can
do no
wrong and can not be sued.
When those
assumptions are
wrong or the state doesn't save enough for the future, it turns into a pension debt.
And, he says, it would be
wrong to criticize other ethnic groups on the
assumption that they don't support their children to the same degree that Asian American parents
do.
But the more fundamental
assumption here is that if the student learning (i.e., test based) indicators
do not correlate with the observational indicators, the latter MUST be
wrong, biased, distorted, and accordingly less trustworthy and the like.
Does your argument address an
assumption (which could be
wrong) that the SAT / ACT test - takers are self - selected?
Things look very different if we start from the opposite
assumption: Teachers want to
do their best for children and are willing to work as hard as it takes, but they may not know how to improve or what's
wrong with the way they've always taught.
Social scientists were
wrong in the belief that change would come easily... Simply mixing children in the classroom and trusting to benign human nature could never have
done the trick... What I am questioning here are the
assumptions underlying the belief that school desegregation, as implemented in the typical school district, will be an instrument to achieve [equal opportunity for all].
They have kept it as pure as humanly possible, but there seems to be this constant
assumption that they have
done something
wrong.
I could be
wrong, so don't hold me to this
assumption if I am.
(These are
assumptions I'm making, please
do correct / educate me if I'm
wrong)..
He is probably making a different
assumption somewhere which
does not mean his code is
wrong.
But I don't think there's anything
wrong with that broad
assumption to protect your investment capital.
Even if we succeed in
doing away with our myths, misconceptions,
wrong assumptions, etc., we will be much better off.
But there are many reasons why that answer could be
wrong, because the math makes too many
assumptions about market liquidity, investor rationality, soundness of funding sources, etc.» Most quants don't know what they are assuming.
(There's a few
assumptions needed to get my TLI numbers, given the limited disclosure, but I don't think the result can be that far
wrong).
If I'm
wrong about your age, that's fine, but, don't make
assumptions that people who argue for being reasonable aren't «hard core» enough.
You have
done little to indicate that my
assumptions or conclusions about a UHI effect were necessarily
wrong which is what my # 123 was about.
While there are undoubtedly individual cases where this has been the case (this protein folding code for instance), the vast majority of papers that turn out to be
wrong, or non-robust are because of incorrect basic
assumptions, overestimates of the power of a test, some wishful thinking, or a failure to take account of other important processes (It might be a good idea for someone to tally this in a quantitative way — any ideas for how that might be
done?).
Everyone needs to make
assumptions and people
do get things
wrong.
I am kind of a reductionist empiricist by nature so I don't see anything
wrong w / playing around w / oceanic fertilization, under the
assumption that it can't go * too * bad * too * quickly.
I
do not think that he's argument is based on this
assumption, which means that he could be still right even if he got this one
wrong.
I think any mathematically - competent scientist who believes in objective inference from experimental results would accept that the IPCC replot of Forster / Gregory06 was
wrong, in that it
did not reflect the (standard) error distribution
assumptions made by the paper's authors.
I don't see anything
wrong with approaching system analysis with minimal
assumptions and seeing what pops out.
You made an
assumption, failed to
do your due diligence, you were
wrong, and you were called on it.