Those who have often know that the theories are incomplete at best, completely
wrong at worst.
You remember Murphy's Law - whatever can go wrong, will go
wrong at the worst possible moment and in the worst possible way.
At the very deepest level the universe still appears to be deterministic and Feyman's dated claim that it isn't was premature at best and probably
wrong at worst.
In all material respects, unfolding events have proven their extremist viewpoint prodigiously exaggerated at best, plain
wrong at worst.
Customer support is important because things always seem to go
wrong at the worst possible times (think Murphy's Law).
Another player who faces an uncertain future is French forward Yann Kermorgant, whose «panenka» attempt went so horribly
wrong at the worst possible time.
This line in particular: «any honest human being who lives with authenticity, truth, and with integrity, looks weak» is questionable at best and quite
wrong at worst.
Not exact matches
However, if you're like me, you have definitely put your foot in your mouth a time or two saying the
wrong thing
at the absolute
worst moment.
This is customer service
at its
worst, and an attempt
at efficiency gone
wrong.
Several skeptical researchers and authors have been hammering away
at the foundations of the foodie cause, arguing that everything Pollan and his acolytes stand for — from the dangers of GMO foods to the benefits of local farming — is based on sketchy evidence
at best, and
at worst is just plain
wrong.
Instead of seeing the person who
wronged you as «
bad,» look
at things from their perspective, or find something you can appreciate or empathize with.
Much is written about the lack of basic knowledge,
wrong expectations and a
bad or no strategy
at all.
«But
at the time, the same people said he was
wrong and was doubling - down on a
bad business.
To be sure,
bad information and the
wrong guidance are putting some lives
at risk.
Worse, after Search Engine Land reported on the obviously incorrect result for the «king of the united states» query, Google now lists content from our report as a direct answer — keeping the
wrong answer
at the top of its search results.
«Since we know we will be
wrong sometimes, we almost always look
at the
worst possible case — to ensure JPMorgan Chase can survive any situation.»
In a crisis, banks might pull the lenders» credit lines, crippling them
at precisely the
wrong time for the broader economy — and that could leave taxpayers to bear the costs of any
bad loans.
Instead, they would have bought because they like the idea of BitGold, oblivious to the fact that a good business can be a
bad investment
at the
wrong price, or because they think that someone else will be dumb enough to pay an even higher price in the future.
In a really large crisis, the return on risk assets may look decent from ten years before to ten years after, but a lot of people get surprised by their need to draw on those assets
at the
wrong moment —
bad events come in bunches, when the credit cycle goes bust.
im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are
at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when —
wrong is called right and right is called
wrong — and people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd of noah --- sodom and gammorah had gay issues
badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor —
at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.
sorry, last person,
wrong person, They are so
bad the priests shows up
at your door if they do nt see you
at church, Hurricane, Utah
igaftr isn't
wrong and you're a sad person if you think people are born
bad... what a pathetic way to look
at your fellow man.
Objective morality does not exist... --------------- If that's true, then no one has any grounds to call Hitler a
bad person, or that he even did anything
bad or
wrong at all.
@Sam Scoville: Are you saying that so long as we maintain a paradigm where there are «good guys» (always us;)-RRB- and «
bad guys» (always them and sometimes not «
bad» but
at the very least, «
wrong»), then we (general «we») are not rising toward Unity with one another and with God?
So I guess I'm not
at all shocked by the findings of the study, but also don't feel there is anything
wrong or
bad about the expected results as a whole.
Good economists know, from work carried out within their discipline, that the foundations of their subject are virtually non-existent... Conventional economics offer prescriptions for the problems of inflation and unemployment which are
at best misleading and
at worst dangerously
wrong... Despite its powerful influence on public life, its achievements...
IMnot a
bad person
at all... IM sorry you feel that way... but you pretty much twisted things (God is murderous... murder is defined as UNLAWFUL taking of life) I teach that God takes and is judge of ALL life... Im sorry you feel that is
wrong... I do NOT teach people to go out and murder or take lives of others... you are making a dishonest blanket statement and lumping everyone together in such a way...
So was he LYING or IGNORANT or just a
BAD SOURCE ----------------------- — If I told you that I spoke to a man
at the gas station today, and later a witness tells you that there were actually 4 men there
at the gas station, are either one of us
wrong?
At least it warns us against the
wrong kind confidence on the matter, and it prevents us from succumbing too easily to that odd variety of self - centeredness, in the
worst sense, which demands «immortality» because it is determined to play «dog in the manger» in God's universe.
Loyal insurgents in your post offices make sure packages are
badly mauled, mail is delivered late, if
at all, often to the
wrong addresses or returned for postage due.
However, 1) by no means is the entire faith «
bad» or «
wrong» because a handful of people abuse the religion, and 2) arguably, «Christian hypocrites» are not really Christians
at all (in the Gospels, for example, the Pharisees, extremely religious Jews who took extreme measures to follow all of Moses» 613 laws, proved to be Jesus» «enemies», because they did not love other people.)
The problem with many modern Christians is that we've seen and experienced too much
bad evangelism: the crazy street preachers shouting
at strangers, the late - night televangelists peddling for money, The Westboro Baptists picketing funerals, the corrupt pastors who eventually make the news for all the
wrong reasons.
I had a friend once say «So all those lessons we had in school about how good fats were liquid
at room temperature and
bad fats were solid... those were
wrong?»
I am very
bad at baking, so not sure what could have gone
wrong, but maybe Lars or Alena from Nutriciously can help you.
I'm new
at Paleo way, and today I «ve Tried this pancakes receip, they are delicious, but they get smashed (sorry for my
bad english, I'm from Mexico), they could not get form, What am I doing
wrong?
I don't disagree with the difficulty they faced, but when the only Plan B was to throw money
at Pau and pick up Joffrey and fill out the roster with guys who would bring nothing to a playoff series, then something went
badly wrong.
AKB's just never run out of excuses, it isn't «
bad luck» when we are first on the injury ladder (by a country mile as well) EVERY SEASON, the last time i remember having a reasonable injury list was before diaby was injury prone, so whether it's down to his tactics, players diets or imcompetent staff, a 2.5 star manager wouldn't have taken more than 2 - 3 seasons to fix these problems, players join our club with amazingly good injury records (ozil) and become injry prone, players leave our club (fabregas) and are fit 2x as much as they were for us, SOMETHING IS
WRONG AT ARSENAL
an if we draw the press would incite a full blown riot
at the post match press conference, which derek chisora will crash an say... come on wladimiOHH sorry
wrong room... my
bad..
I'm getting annoyed that people fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting
bad) while it is very fair points that he made very
wrong judgement in not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive
at time in term of tactics.
I mean honestly — SCHOOLBOY errors in defence — stepping up
at the
wrong time, playing
bad lines, squaring up opponents, not making blocks, not being strong in the tackle etc..
I'm not saying spending on the OL is a
bad idea, or that you are
wrong at all, because I do agree with your basic premise.
It got so
bad that Fernando decided that he'd prefer to do the Indy 500 than race
at Monaco, and on a few occasions even retired a car that had nothing
wrong with it because he couldn't be bothered to drive around near the back with no hope of achieving anything meaningful.
Have to chalk Sunday up to just a
bad performance
at the
wrong time.
The
worst was yet to come for McIlroy, but he had to know after his blown opportunity on the par - 4 seventh that he was heading in the
wrong direction on moving day
at Augusta.
Ok I always believe that one man decision is
wrong and risky, as we can se Wenger brought good player and
bad player to this club as well, there is many aspects that we have to look
at, but there is one think for certain if there is a committee of highly rated retired player plus manager to decide what they need and who they need then there should be one that is able to negotiated.
Aston Villa, meanwhile, will be looking to the likes of Charles N'Zogbia and Gabriel Agbonlahor to inspire them
at Upton Park today, with Paul Lambert's side
badly in need of points to move away from the
wrong end of the table.
It's entirely possible that absolutely everything goes
wrong and the Sixers decide to keep all their mid lotto picks and wind up with something like Stanley Johnson, Marquese Chriss, and Malik Monk, but you're really looking
at the
worst possible outcome there.
Was it
bad luck that jack missed from 5 yards no it was quality Was it
bad luck Danny missed 2/3 chances no again it's quality Was it
bad luck to concede the second no lack of quality We got lucky jack should have been sent off We have a serious problem
at Arsenal, I said weeks ago we will struggle to finish top 4, now I am sure we won't so what's the so.ution Please don't thumb me down explain why you think I'm
wrong
Recently when ever i watch AW on TV giving an interview i don't know weather to laugh or vote for him for the next president of France, he has become to arrogant, predictable robot like with his answers but most of all his undermining his supporters treating them like Children who don't understand, its possible you can do this if your decisions or play is always correct but to fail and pretend it like its anything ells but a failure is
wrong, Arsen man up and say we fuc ed up and show your disappointment
at players who are not giving all or just sub them if they are having a
bad day its normal,
Just when he seems to be having one of those
bad games
at the
wrong time, he digs deep and soars.