As it is, any government will invoke the precautionary principle and point to The Consensus: «We trusted the UN and 97 % of Those Who Know; you blind skeptics trusted only your own shortsighted reason...» The fact that they were not only 97 %, but 100 %
wrong changes nothing.
Not exact matches
If you realize within the first few years of your business that there's a more optimal name based on how consumers view you, then there's
nothing wrong with making a
change.
Though there's
nothing wrong with a little speculation and dreaming of alternatives, constant checking out to wistfully imagine a preferred future is a sure sign that you need to
change careers right away.
«There is
nothing wrong with being lossmaking and
nothing wrong with raising a round, and if one round is lower than another that can happen, but what you shouldn't forget is the day you are profitable it
changes something for your company,» Van der Does told CNBC.
It is only
wrong to
change your mind and do
nothing about it» Seth Klarman
But that is
wrong; we are the creatures, and
nothing about us can ever equal or
change our Creator.
The preacher is right everyone should be who they are... but then again the Bible does state that it is an abomination to God... But get this... before God can judge you Jesus has to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have
nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is
wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can
change things...
As far as the
wrongs committed by members of church, that does
nothing, and should do
nothing to
change my opinion of the church as a whole.
That is what his audience wishes to hear —
nothing challenging,
nothing changing, we are right and the world is
wrong, and God loves us in our corner.
Nothing has
changed, you all think your version is the «right» one and that everyone else is «
wrong» and no one has any more claim to a real god than the next.
Being an atheist proves only one thing, you believe in
nothing and you will never ne riight but you can be terribly
wrong if you do not
change your thinking.
Recently my dude and I have been consciously making an effort to cook «more exciting» breakfasts / brunches on the weekends, other than scrambled eggs and avocado toast (
nothing wrong with that of course, but sometimes you just need to
change things up) and we started last weekend with these Brown Sugar, Blueberry and Coconut Pancakes!
Nothing and what is he leaving behind coqoliin xhaka eleny monreal walcott!!!! So he has had 80 million in wages and thats what he cares about and that also goes for everyone running OUR club that do nt give a monkeys about the title or europe it will only
change when totally fail and finish 10 - 12 for a few years and there pockets get hit and i can see it and that will make me hate wenger kronke gazidis and all those stuck up arrogant directors of our beloved club it will be like going back to Don howe managing the club and 17000 on the stands I hope i am
wrong but can anyone see it any other way????? Time for
change and
change now Troy deemy is right no balls I wouldnt want to go into a battle with any of them backing me up White feathers all round
As the Owner, Board and the majority of Arsenal fans say»
Nothing wrong with doing the same thing over and over» Why
change the winning strategy?
Nothing to be gained, it
changes fa, it's all just one meaningless negative sound bite versus another, so really has little value to anyone other than those who get of on telling us what's
wrong and how they'd have won us the World Cup.
It's all gone cold... And no one wants to
change It's all so
wrong... But no one wants the blame It's all gone cold... There's
nothing left to gain It's all so
wrong... But who am I, who am I to say?
The only one that can prove WENGER
wrong is WENGER himself, if after 12 years and counting he still does not get it that times
changed, despite after every season anyone can clearly pinpoint our deficiencies and yet
nothing is done, then there is really no hope that WENGER will
change his approach.
Wenger said «Judge me on May», here is May... Carbon copy season to the previous seasons, the same mistakes, the same tactics, the same arrogance,
nothing changed... I would like this review to come from the board... They has to question the manager what's gone
wrong and what he need to get in the right track... Even - though somehow we finished second, I see us moved backward...
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the
wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all
change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is
nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
No.the solution is not to get some1 to rotate with Giroud, the answer is to get some1 better than Giroud, period.It worries me that Giroud really thinks that Henry is
wrong, this shows how much Wenger an the people at Arsenal are caught up in their own bubble unable to see an overview from outside.We've been saying that Girouds not good enough since he came 3 years ago, an im afraid
nothing has
changed, he still not world class, i can't think of a top team in Europe he would get into.
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with
nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is
wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold
As I said earlier, I see
nothing wrong with rotating players,
changing formation slightly, depending on the opposition, state of the game, fatigue, injuries etc, and Ozil, Rambo, Santi, Alexis, Jack, Mikel and co, should ALL realise that being class does not mean you play every game.
There was
nothing wrong with the
changes made, we just could not beat the keeper and our finishing was poor.
Yes, but sadly i think now the problem has become so endemic it is going to be on the
wrong side of a nasty season or two, we need a manager who can tear everything up and start again from
nothing, Spurs are used to that, but our systems and organisation have not seen significant
change in 20 years, it takes a lot more rebuilding
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang while wenger face went all red with
nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR is far to slow to fix things what is
wrong with him he most not be in good health cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold
I am a Arsenal fan have been for some time longer than Wenger has been Manager, do not get me
wrong but I want Arsenal to lose the final, reasons being that hopefully Will be the only time Wenger would wałk Wenger has to go enough is enough if Arsenal win Wenger and the board will say that there is no problem with the setup here at Arsénal
nothing needs to
change Wengers got it all in hand for next season Blah Blah Blah ect groundhog day all over again.
Even the fact that the boss had got it
wrong might not have been so bad if he had reacted to fix the problem, but instead he sat on the bench saying
nothing and waited for over an hour before making the
change that most felt was needed about a minute in.
You keep seeing him around, and wondering where his life went
wrong, and occasionally he'll pipe up and talk to you, like
nothing has
changed, and you're forced to endure a series of boring media quotes.
Nothing wrong with developing new hobbies and improving your appearance of course, but if these
changes coincide with some other behavioral
changes such as a lack of interest in sex, then this could well be telling you that a potential divorce is on the horizon.
There's
nothing wrong with just
changing your baby on your bed, honestly.
It's tempting to put a mobile above her
changing table and hustle through diaper
changes and there's
nothing wrong with that some of the time.
There is
nothing wrong with this, and you are not diminishing the quality of your parenting by
changing your style as it's needed, but you do need to identify your style to effectively sleep rain your baby.
Maybe if they learn more about extended breastfeeding and realize that there is
nothing wrong with it and it only benefits you and your child they may
change their way of thinking.
You can probably get some relief by making some small
changes, you may need meds but you won't have to stop nursing unless you want to, and there is
nothing wrong with you as a person.
There's
nothing wrong with keeping to yourself, as long as you make sure to take care of yourself, rather than act like
nothing life -
changing happened.
If you and your daycare provider want to stick to a paper system (
nothing wrong with that) check out the Feed Me
Change Me Love Me journal, a baby tracker journal to help manage the paperwork.
The problem is that your in - laws, your friend, or your neighbor is telling you that something in the way you are doing things is
wrong and must be
changed... Here's the bottom line: if your child is getting enough sleep, you all are sleeping well, and the people who live in the home are happy with the way things are working out, then
nothing needs to be fixed, regardless of what anyone else has to say about your family's sleeping situation (p. 14).
Every time I asked them they had
nothing but good to say about their health care system don't get me
wrong I am not in favor of a single payer system but we need to
change our health care delivery system.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie said «we need to explore»
changing the state tax structure to move away from using a state income tax on employees and implementing a payroll tax on employers, adding: «To just do
nothing... would be
wrong.»
But while there's
nothing wrong with disagreement, even mildly abusive disagreement, there has been a definite
change in tone over the course of this campaign.
There can be
nothing morally
wrong with a campaign pointing out the harmful effects that a particular policy
change might have on the country, or on particular groups of voters.
A dynamic orator, Cizik said that climate
change denialism by evangelicals was a «heresy committed against all of creation,
nothing less than a monstrous
wrong.»
While there's
nothing wrong with a standard Vinyasa flow, it's fun to
change up your practice from time to time, and really put your balance, strength, and agility to the test.
Of the countless
changes that follow a newborn, I've learned our relationships tend to have a boiling frog effect;
nothing really noticeable at first, but over time — we're both wondering what went
wrong.
If you are squatting 95 lbs (
nothing wrong with this) and they are deadlifting 495 lbs, then it would involve a lot of weight
changes and most people will say «no» to working in.
I know of a lot of actual friends, you know, who will try something like this — and I have
nothing wrong with people trying things — but they'll buy into a myth like this, they'll make
changes in their lifestyle that we would generally think are good, for instance, eating more vegetables, eating more fruits, and they may have underlying health conditions that make meat or animal consumption, such as low stomach acid or GI infections or anything, a little harder for them to digest right now.
While there's
nothing wrong with some variety to keep things interesting and overcome plateaus,
change for its own sake is directionless and most of the latest gimmicks are
nothing more than flashes in the pan that will be out of fashion by this time in 2019, if not before.
When
nothing changed, I was told that I must be doing something
wrong, but I was doing everything as prescribed.
Everyone is different and cope with
changes differently, and there is
nothing wrong with that.
It's a nice
change from my typical colors; there's
nothing wrong with earth tones!