Sentences with phrase «wrong committed by»

A common area of dispute in civil cases is how far a claimant, who has to incur legal costs against a third party as a result of a wrong committed by the defendant and fails to recover those costs in full from the third party, can then recover them as damages from the defendant.
the damages claimed are not as a result of any wrong committed by the defendants, but rather in anticipation that they would be members of a group of then undetermined individuals who might do something wrong.
However, a lawsuit is intended to bring about «compensatory» results — to put one in the position they would have been but for the wrong committed by way a monetary award.
Under s. 38 (3) of the Trustee Act, an action against an executor or administrator of an estate for a wrong committed by a deceased person must be brought within two years of the date of death.
As far as the wrongs committed by members of church, that does nothing, and should do nothing to change my opinion of the church as a whole.
Christianity has done much more good than bad in the past 2000 years so although you can point out some of the horrendous wrongs committed by churches and governments, it doesn't eclipse the good.
It is Japan's way of inflicting pain and suffering upon America; retribution for the many wrongs committed by America.
Secondly, can you believe that this was an attempt to right the wrongs committed by the previous entry in the series?
Each painting is as much a tutorial in flora and fauna as it is as a scathing indictment of the wrongs committed by nineteenth - century industrialists or — locating the work in the present — contemporary American consumer society.
You can also fill out an online contact form with the details of your case and we will contact you discuss how we can right the wrongs committed by the careless parties that caused your accident.
But for Samsung, it's actually year two of the smartwatch, a second round to right the wrongs committed by its first effort, last year's Galaxy Gear.

Not exact matches

Even during those times when my website crashed during a big online launch or when planning for a client retreat went dreadfully wrong, I would remember I was simply committed, day by day making my «honey», and that metaphorical flowers were indeed blooming, whether I could see them or not.
«We are committed to righting the wrongs of the Obama administration by cleaning the regulatory slate.
This kind of behaviour is more than a simple wrong being committed against a single entrepreneur, a mere victimization of David by Goliath's over-zealous lawyers.
So they see nothing wrong with continuing to commit so many Satanic acts, since they are already condemned to be eaten by the worm for ETERNITY.
It is because they were trying to right the wrong that had been committed by King Saul hundreds of years earlier.
Many people sometimes, or for a while, act contrary to sincerely held convictions (by committing a sin), and other people, given time, come to recognise past behaviour as wrong (they may repent and convert).
This does not make only the USA guilty of great wrongs done / there's many nations ruled by tyrants / psychopaths / / those blinded by greed the great injustice by Israel against palestinians but sums up the horror that nations being capable of committing / heartless acts of inhumanity of cruelity / / based on halfbaked ideas / beliefs / religious brainwashing.
But though I am deeply convinced that the ideas and ideals of economism are wrong, I am also quite sure that they are honestly held by persons who are sincere in their Christian beliefs and committed to the wellbeing of humanity.
For example, I am prepared to acknowledge — as did Pope John Paul II — the wrongs committed in the Crusades against Jews, Eastern Orthodox Christians and Muslims by Christian princes and soldiers at the invitation of popes.
the only real control one has is the outward interactions with others and if those who claim to hold to a moral code show a lack of understanding on said claims then it is the duty of those seekers of truth to right the wrongs committed in the names of others by ignorant fools.
On the other hand, the polls show that most people still think abortion is wrong, and, as Lincoln said of slavery, «Like every other wrong which some men will commit if left alone, it ought to be prohibited by law.»
Preemptive war by definition does not satisfy this criterion, since it is waged not to avenge wrongs» actually committed (Augustine), but to prevent wrongs that are only anticipated.
Similarly, in the 1960s, it was right to condemn atrocities committed by the United States and its allies in Indochina; it was wrong to go on from this stand to an endorsement of the political goals of the North Vietnamese regime.
They asked for God's forgiveness in advance for any wrong they might be committing by their decision to leave this life before they needlessly suffered even more.
Of that majority not committed by priests, there's a consensus among everyone (except the perp, obvi) that it's wrong, and that the pedophile should go to jail.
Suicide committed by one who knows right from wrong is unforgivable by God.
It asks for forgiveness for «the sin we have committed before Thee by hardening our hearts» and goes on to mention «sins we have committed before Thee in speech» and «the sin we have committed before Thee by wronging our neighbor.»
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
You're implying (please correct me if I'm wrong) that the coaches essentially sacrificed last year in order to increase our probability to keep the commit of a quarterback... I just don't know how a coaching staff doesn't destroy the culture of a locker room by doing that.
But in their self - imposed season of anomie, Afenifere committed the ultimate ideological apostasy, by their own Awoist doctrine: pushed the wrong cause, backed the wrong horse, kept the wrong company, and coalesced behind the wrong person, as arrowhead to Aso Rock, in Ondo Governor, Olusegun Mimiko, ruthless political hustler and survivalist, who just defected to the wide - and - merry Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), from the supposedly straight - and - narrow Labour Party (LP).
Yet, the wrongs Oyegun committed had nothing to do with newness or the mistakes occasioned by the path of reform.
Lord Atkin's famous opinion in Ambard v. Attorney - General for Trinidad and Tobago [1936] AC 322, is apposite: «But whether the authority and position of an individual judge, or the due administration of justice, is concerned, No wrong is committed by any member of the public who exercises the ordinary right of criticising, in good faith, in private or public, the public act done in the seat of justice.
ACEP's contention that Ghana does not need the second KARPOWER barge, is is not only wrong in logic, we see it as a well calculated error committed by the energy think - tank to inject a message of hopelessness and apprehension among the Ghanaian populace, as far as electricity distribution is concerned.
Nick Clegg, who has been briefed by the prime minister on the speech, will reject Cameron's pledge to hold a referendum by 2017 on the grounds that it is wrong to commit Britain to such a specific timetable when there is uncertainty over whether negotiations will take place.
A dynamic orator, Cizik said that climate change denialism by evangelicals was a «heresy committed against all of creation, nothing less than a monstrous wrong
«Purple Noon» is not a movie about a wrong man falsely accused of a crime he hasn't committed, like Cary Grant in «North by Northwest,» or Robert Donat in «The 39 Steps.»
It provides whoever committed the wrong the chance to be held accountable by the community of students affected, and it allows those individuals to determine what must be done to reconcile.
Yes, whether right or wrong, a businesswoman was repeatedly urged to commit suicide over allegations that she made a book cover that was too similar in nature to an existing cover, and potentially used a stock photo that has been used by other professionals.
Aching for Always follows Joss O'Malley as she struggles to save her family's map - making company — and travels through time with a Navy Captain seeking revenge for wrongs of the past (committed by none other than Joss's dad).
Now, unable to cope with her banishment, she is a seemingly normal seventeen year old girl by day, while she spends her nights punishing men for the wrongs they have committed against women.
A volunteer, rescuer, or any other member of the public not only has the First Amendment right to speak out against abuses and violations of law committed by a government shelter, he or she also has a constitutionally protected right to demand that the government correct the wrongs that are identified.
«We are committed to righting the wrongs of the Obama administration by cleaning the regulatory slate.»
And a fourth 4) Climategate was shunned by the media for a long time, because they didn't want to believe their cult's leaders could ever do anything wrong or commit scientific malpractice, whereas in this case, the FORGED document was seized upon immediately, and propagated by the Alarmist media outlets and «friendly» blogs without any hesitation or journalistic care.
Don't get me wrong I'm committed to fighting anthropogenic climate change — by addressing the human behaviours that cause it, and whether we succeed or fail there is always the possibility that life will adapt, obviously any such possibility is made more unlikely the more «climate change» we create.
Lawsuit reform, or tort reform, refocuses litigation on the reasonable reimbursement of injured victims for wrongs committed against them by another's actions.
«An action for the wrong committed in respect of the plaintiff's land by entry on the same without lawful authority.
I am hoping that the court «s role in this case will strike at the very existence of an absolute immunity under two guiding principles: equality under the law (especially when the alleged wrong has been committed by a person who should be held to the highest standards of conduct in exercising a public trust; and any infringement of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms constitutes «improper purpose» aimed at gaining a private collateral advantage.
The law school definition of a tort is a «civil wrongcommitted by one person against another that results in injury.
For Stephen, Baron & Budd was a good match for his goals to bring about justice to those who have been wronged through no fault of their own: «I saw in Baron & Budd a law firm committed to helping those injured by corporate indifference and greed.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z