Sentences with phrase «wrong decisions by»

The away side always looked dangerous on the attack, and had it not been for several clearly wrong decisions by the home linesman, the game would have been beyond doubt long before Rubenstein slotted home into an empty net after Sam Donald had squared the ball to him just before the hour.

Anyone who hates him simply hates him for his actions: a plethora of wrong decisions by him (my opinion).

When property prices were booming, I'd sometimes wonder if I'd made the wrong decision by deciding to go it alone — even though I know that working a nine - to - five in an office and answering to some buffoon of a manager would kill me.

Admins pls be more accurate with your reviews... The pass was to Willock (he was awful), and it wasn't a wrong decision by Lacazette who had two castle players in front of him and decided to unselfishly pass to Willock who was in a better position but couldn't sort his feet out..

Now if you call Wenger a liar and you think there was a bust up then he also made the wrong decision by bringing Sanchez on after 45 minutes.

However it seems that he really does not, and that lack of balance in his life is what will soon lead him to make the wrong decision by staying.

BIG wrong decision by the linesman.

Valentin made the wrong decision by giving Quintero his favorite side - then got beaten easily.

Speaking on the Point Blank segment on Eyewitness News on Friday, Mr. Ramadan insisted that he did not make a wrong decision by joining the NPP.

Does this mean i have taken a wrong decision by investing now since markets / NAV is high?

Alternatively, you might realize later that you made a wrong decision by investing in an endowment plan.

Not exact matches

«What the president is doing by making his own unilateral decisions that indicate that we're ready to start a military confrontation --- that's just moving in the wrong direction.»

Titled Seven Ways Good Bosses Turn Bad, the guide notes that those micro-managing the team by second - guessing their decisions, those neglecting the workload of the team members, those who don't accept responsibility for failures, and those offering feedback the wrong way, are just a few instances of managers and bosses who can be considered «bad.»

Although the final decision to pull the plug came quickly, it was precipitated by months of struggling, weeks of discovering all of the things we were doing wrong and analyzing the many factors that were just plain out of my control.

«While there is nothing wrong with having more stocks in a portfolio, that decision should be a result of your planning process, not dictated primarily by the markets,» says Dowd.

Where Google went wrong was with that maps decision: making turn - by - turn directions an Android - exclusive differentiated Android as a platform, but to what end?

Even when we pass on a deal, we respond quickly and provide transparent reasons for our decision, often accompanied by a humble acknowledgement that we could be wrong and what evidence could disprove our hypothesis.

Although wrong to let investment decisions be driven by taxation, is there an issue of any income being taxable directly, whereas there any capital could be managed to a degree by realising any gains / losses on an annual basis and using the capital allowance?

The Truth regarding Man is, we are all individual islands controlled by our individual consciousness and no matter how much religion or education one has, it's ones day to day conscious decision to decide to do right or wrong.

There is nothing wrong with his decision, but he shouldn't expect to be employed by people who he is publically disagreeing with and openly stating he can not and will not perform duties he was hired to perform

Therefore I think it wrong for her to be suspended although I respect the theological rigour by the college in coming to its decision on this and respect that there is a different theological position held by the college.

But if to use such weapons is wrong, it must also be wrong to possess them, since possession tempts powerfully toward use — whether by deliberate decision, technological accident or human error.

There are good secular reasons for being guided by a concern for the common good and for those who have the most to lose if we make the wrong decision.

In pondering analogies with the Holocaust, we may be inclined to think that this is what distinguishes us from them: we know what we are doing, we recognize and openly discuss the potential risks and potential wrongs, and our decisions are accompanied by the prescribed quota of anguish.

We are indeed inheritors of a past that for millennia has been marked by wrong decisions, followed by wrong acts and words and thoughts; this is our inescapable situation.

But it appears to me to be easy and quick to show that the position advocated by Johnson and Weigel is wrong on simple logical grounds, grounds that do not require decisions about controversial and difficult exegetical matters such as what Augustine thought or what Aquinas meant.

Yet God is the One who values and uses, because God incorporates into the divine life which is everlasting the good that takes place in the historical sequence; and God overrules or uses for good that which comes from the «vain imagination of foolish men» in their sin and defection — and, we may add, from anything else that is evil or wrong thanks to the free decisions made by the creatures in their divinely granted capacity to choose among relevant possibilities.

Could it be that the decision making, even the scope of life, of atheists is limited by conflating rationality / objectivity / accuracy with mere mental reason alone, which is why they ask a wrong question?

I'm sure there are plenty of Christians who would recognize Gov. Brewers decision as the right choice and the bill passed by the Arizona Senate as being wrong.

If they don't, if they succumb to the outcry of what almost inevitably is a vocal minority, they are teaching precisely the wrong lesson — that any decision by any duly constituted body can be reversed, if only you're loud enough.

«While the discussion board itself was a bad idea, my decision to attack critics who were posting there (I did so by posting under the character «William Wallace II») was an even worse idea,» Driscoll said in his letter Friday, provided to CT. «I was wrong to respond to people the way I did, using the language I used, and I am sorry for it and remain embarrassed by it.»

Most of them, to judge by what I've seen of them and their advance notices, are by authors who want to change the subject - to what's wrong with church teaching on sexuality, to celibacy, to women's ordination, to democratizing decision making, to anything but fidelity.

One protects us from input, disagreement, disappointment, and the risk we might be wrong by placing all responsibility for the decision onto God.

But since this is the case with God, we can speak meaningfully of a divine enrichment by accomplished good in creation, and we can also allow for what might be styled a divine sadness because of wrong creaturely decisions and what they bring about.

They asked for God's forgiveness in advance for any wrong they might be committing by their decision to leave this life before they needlessly suffered even more.

Accordingly, there is some validity to pessimism as one contemplates the real capacity of the human race to do evil and the possibility that mankind may precipitate incalculably tragic evil and suffering by its wrong decisions regarding destructive warfare and the population explosion.53 Given creative becoming as an everlastingly continuous process, Hartshorne declares that there will always be some evil in the world; but the amount of evil will always be at least partially determined by creative choices.

A person or an institution demonstrates integrity not only by choosing right from wrong in a concrete situation but by maintaining a «commitment to the pattern over a wide range of different actual and potential decisions, in differing situations, with differing consequences and levels of predictability of such consequences.

But, other people deserve life, and shouldn't have to lose their lives by someone else's plainly wrong personal decisions.

Poor old Hector was on the wrong side of another poor decision this season, when he was taken out by a Stoke defender but got nothing.

Why is there no accountability for wrong decisions made by referees that matches the consequences of their actions.

The young Brazil star was omitted from Luiz Felipe Scolari's World Cup squad this summer, and by the looks of it he made the wrong decision as the former Inter Milan ace dazzled the Danes with some exceptional moves and boosted his credentials ahead of the new campaign.

based on «many of your comments» you are wrong... unlike some I do not have rose coloured glasses firmly attached to my mug and indeed I am not impressed by some of Botterill's decisions but the JURY IS OUT for a couple of years.

One decision that rarely goes wrong is when TyRee gets the ball to his brother, no matter by pass or handoff.

The penalty decision may be seen as dubious, but the club should point the finger at themselves rather than Lee Mason who, by letter of the law, did not put a foot wrong.

So this is an admission that the decision to send off Gab and the red card waved by that useless sod Dean was wrong.

By the way is only one digning enough?Have u ever thought about it?The problems in the team are plain and honestly one signing is not enough but hey we will take something over nothing shant we.I really love Arsene Wenger he has not really been able to handle the pressure in Arsenal for dome years now.He keeps making wrong decisions season by season.So if i was him i would go all out and get the job done now!By the way is only one digning enough?Have u ever thought about it?The problems in the team are plain and honestly one signing is not enough but hey we will take something over nothing shant we.I really love Arsene Wenger he has not really been able to handle the pressure in Arsenal for dome years now.He keeps making wrong decisions season by season.So if i was him i would go all out and get the job done now!by season.So if i was him i would go all out and get the job done now!!!

If that wrong decision taken by dean was meant for us to be crown champions in as many years, would it mean it was Wengers fault that we haven't won anything in as many years.

Why would Alexis do that These days when a player signs as a «free agent» he will.ask for a signing on fee and his salary will be set high... depending upon his marketability.Defoe signed for Bournemouth on a «free» and received a very healthy fee himself as well as a reported # 100k a week.Imahine what Alexis could negotiate in January... and after that he can just about «shut up shop» as far as Arsenal are concerned... going through the motions until the end of the Season on preparation for the World Cup followed by his lucrative move to a new Club Once again Arsenal made the wrong decision and have shot themselves in both feet #shambles

The Frenchman is likely to be punished by the FA following his full - time rant about the officiating of the match, citing a number of decisions which went against his side, but Alan Shearer insists Wenger was wrong to chastise Sterling also.

There has been talk of Arsenal being hard - done by, and even Graham Poll claimed that the penalty decision was wrong, but Mark Clattenburg has studied the footage and insists there was in fact contact which resulted in bringing Richarlison to the ground.