Sentences with phrase «wrong done against»

The first answer is letting go of the wrong done against you.

As YHWH made them to be, punishment for us all leaving Him for idols, religions, and wrong doing against righteousness, prophesied that their descendants would reach dominion in Genesis 27, the «sword» prophesy fulfilled.

Not exact matches

There are obvious advantages to doing so, such as protecting against personal financial liabilities should anything with the business go wrong.

Teller told Derwin that Musk's «sincerity shouldn't be questioned» on climate change, and that speaking out against him was the wrong thing to do, according to Derwin.

Uber subsequently emailed users to make clear that the company thinks President Donald Trump's immigration ban is «unjust, wrong, and against everything we stand for as a company,» though much of the damage may have already been done.

«Though the vast majority of Americans think it is wrong and should be against the law, [most state] laws do not protect the LGBT workforce from this kind of discrimination,» Peter Romer - Friedman, an attorney with Cohen Milstein, a law - firm in Washington, D.C., says.

Wenger, on the other hand, is purely an optimist who doesn't plan for anything going wrong and is confounded when things go against him.

Don't get me wrong, there will be a time for having an extremely clear vision that we can lock in on, market against, hire against, build against.

In an emailed statement, James Fitz - Morris, a spokesman for Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, said Canada is committed to righting historical wrongs committed against Indigenous people and that the federal government is working to resolve the matter out of court, as it did with the Sixties Scoop survivors» class action.

In doing so, we are balancing the improvement in our quantitative measures, as well as our qualitative analysis, against our tolerance for risk (we prefer investment positions that allow us to be dead wrong about everything and still not experience intolerable losses).

Once we can do that, detecting fraudulent clicks and wrong charges would become a whole lot easier and would remove a lot of the suspicions that the advertisers currently have against Google, Yahoo and others.

On Friday's broadcast of CNN's «Situation Room,» Representative Jackie Speier (D - CA) criticized the DNC's lawsuit against the Trump campaign and its associates, the Russian government, and WikiLeaks as «ill - conceived,» and «the wrong thing to be doing.»

im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when — wrong is called right and right is called wrong — and people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd of noah --- sodom and gammorah had gay issues badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor — at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.

Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't think people are arguing against the website itself, but the idea it represents, i.e. gender segregation.

(Can't expect decent people to fight next to coloreds, can't trust colored men in a battle, don't use the army for liberal politics, the soldiers are against it, the civilians don't know what they're doing, there's a war on and this isn't the right time, etc.) It was wrong then and it is wrong now.

I did see one point in Tony Perkin's article that resonated with me and that was the warning of crossing the line and reverse discriminating against people who feel, for whatever reason that GLBT is wrong.

Young Master Locke (to give him a name) would rarely have to be constrained to «do the right thing» and forgo the wrong thing, while his peers would inevitably bridle against and at least sometimes overcome the constraints that sought to keep them within their proper bounds.

39:32 — Then, who does more wrong than one who utters a lie against Allah, and denies the truth [this Quran, the Prophet (Muhammad SAW, and Jesus the Son of Marry), the Islamic Monotheism, the Resurrection and the reward or punishment according to good or evil deeds] when it comes to him!

Many Flint residents have called for charges against Michigan Governor Rick Snyder, but he has publicly insisted that he does not think he did anything wrong.

I should emphasize that there is nothing methodologically wrong with this assertion, although it does go against the grain for many New Testament scholars, who, as J. Z. Smith has observed, are still dominated by the essentially apologetic (and Protestant) myth of Christian autochthony.

If the rapture does happen when you say, I'll admit I'm wrong and never say another word against christianity.

Their problem is that they don't like what they know about God and believe that they can rebel against God and win (this is where their beliefs are wrong).

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that we should abolish marriage or that I'm against it or anything.

This vengeance was directed, not necessarily against the individual who had done the wrong, but against the whole family, clan, or tribe to which he belonged or against any single member of it, however innocent himself.

I am not an Evangelical Protestant but I find it hard to believe that Evangelicals see Obama as «Evangelical» Then again Evangelicals believe that NOTHING you do is counted against you once you say the sinners prayer so I could be wrong.

Nor do we have «phobias» against people who want to do things we think are wrong.

Where did the morals come from that tell so many Christians that the Bible is WRONG to support slavery and discrimination against women and the handicapped?

It's clearly interracial & God defends him against those claiming what he did was wrong.

but you would argue against that because you want cops just «doing whats right» — which is suspect to personal feelings of right and wrong!

So if that is the case, why do I have such a humanitarian heart, compassion to those that are even of evil doing, forgiving to those who do wrongs against me, and why is my conversations on issues in my life with Christ the utmost civil and peaceful?

«Christian, if you can not say definitively, no matter what, that adults creeping on teenage girls is wrong, do not tell me how you stand against moral relativism,» he tweeted.

but, when I see all these extremist bombing all over the world & EXPRESS HATE to American the land WE live in, do we not have a responsibility show up and fight against them — fight for our country USA has nothing to do with Islam — wrong is wrong no matter what religion...

Where do the morals come from that tell you the Bible is WRONG to support the OWNING of other people; discrimination against women, discrimination against the handicapped, unpunished BEATING of slaves, children, etc..?

If you have knowingly done something wrong against someone else, it would be decent to try to correct your mistake in whatever way you can.

This does not make only the USA guilty of great wrongs done / there's many nations ruled by tyrants / psychopaths / / those blinded by greed the great injustice by Israel against palestinians but sums up the horror that nations being capable of committing / heartless acts of inhumanity of cruelity / / based on halfbaked ideas / beliefs / religious brainwashing.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

I think that segregating any group of people, or maintaining a prejudice against any group of people is wrong, and I don't care if the Christians» deity called for it or not, or if the Bible called for it or not.

And to face the consequences of wrong doing and fight against evil and for justice for all, then we all will be in a better place.

How far Jesus himself would have extended this to wrongs done to others, to violence against others, or to political, economic, and social injustice is debatable.

He is such a caring person and against the wrongs being done to all people and the US that I am so happy in knowing that he is right on the money with his beliefs Thank God for him

I'll teach them when something is so wrong against our faith to stand up for it, but to do so in a way that will show others it's the right choice, not by just condemning the other choice available.

But he who healed the sick, who denounced in scathing language injustice and oppression, who drove the money changers from the temple, certainly did not mean that his followers should do nothing and say nothing against wrong.

Religion being used against us does not mean religions are wrong but those on charge of ruling who were wrong and religion should not be blamed for it... religion has contributed much in educating us because from learning the Quran many became to read and write Arabic, beside that verses and the challenge within has made us read, think and observe creation with all that relates to it.

And in the next place, describing what properly is defiance, it teaches that a man does wrong although he understands what is right, or forbears to do right although he understands what is right; in short, the Christian doctrine of sin is pure impertinence against man, accusation upon accusation; it is the charge which the Deity as prosecutor takes the liberty of lodging against man.

But if you want to introduce a whole new criticism that you don't believe the Bible is what Christians believe it is, you are of course also wrong, and simply blindly railing against the idea of religious authority and expertise because, God forbid someone else suggest to you what is right or divinely inspired because that might limit your imaginary freedom and insult your nonexistent expertise and intelligence.

There it means, according to Luke Johnson, «to «cover over» something by overlooking or forgiving or not counting against» people the wrong they have done.

I broke with the faith of my youth, railed against over-realized eschatology, studied theology and waxed philosophic about all the ways they were doing it wrong.

Of course, there are things we can be unified on with people who do not follow Jesus, for Paul wrote that our struggle is not against flesh and blood, which means that if we find ourselves struggling with flesh and blood, we have been tricked into fighting the wrong thing.

You keep saying I am wrong when I say I have personally and or do not think atheists are discriminated against anymore thant those with faith.