May attempts to side - step this particular pitfall by claiming
that wrong facts about climate change are only held because they were put there by the wrong people — conspiracies of «an active and well - funded «denial lobby» `, in May's words.
While the vagaries (i.e. AMO) of
climate change study may glaze the eyes of all but dedicated scientists who are paid to examine these
climate change causative permutations, the consequences of being
WRONG about the facts and acting on those wrong beliefs prematurely, are hardly v
WRONG about the
facts and acting on those
wrong beliefs prematurely, are hardly v
wrong beliefs prematurely, are hardly vague.
The paper was entitled «Why Models Run Hot» and sought to provide an explanation for the most salient
fact about the
climate -
change debate: why the turn - of - the - century
climate models were all
wrong and failed to foresee the two - decade global - warming «pause».