Sentences with phrase «wrong facts in the article»

There are several blatantly wrong facts in the article that I will start with.

Not exact matches

You pointed to a dispute of how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in human DNA, But that article doesn't change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.

What is wrong regarding the teachings or facts of Mormonism in the article?

This article sums it up: «Similarly, when next Saturday passes without a Rapture, some will say, «See, the Bible was wrong again,» when, in fact, it will have been Harold Camping who was wrong — again».

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

In fact there are thousands of articles out there about why its wrong.

But since the one statement of fact in the entire article is wrong, and the whole analysis is built on an erroneous premise, I'm not enormously interested in the policy recommendations.

However, the man himself insists that the article was wrong in many of its assertions and yesterday sent the following message to local activists in the Richmond Park constituency in which he is standing, to explain that he has not in fact been a «non-dom» since April:

His article was filled with misinformation, missing facts, false allegations, wrong conclusions, slander, and in my opinion, sensational fear - mongering.

I agree with many of the points in your article, and I do in fact believe the shorts are wrong.

Note that the Newsweek article, which cited the NOAA's scientists» conclusions of the «fact» of imminent global cooling in the near future, was 100 % wrong.

The CIE is briefly mentioned in footnote 24 to this post in fact, and is to do with the persistence of impressions formed even when later told they are wrong, and even if warned beforehand they may be wrong, which is very similar to one of the examples in the article you link.

They concede that the article was so spectacularly wrong about the near - term future but defend themselves with In fact, the story wasn't «wrong» in the journalistic sense of «inaccurate», which seems rather self - servinIn fact, the story wasn't «wrong» in the journalistic sense of «inaccurate», which seems rather self - servinin the journalistic sense of «inaccurate», which seems rather self - serving.

But the basic fact in the article - that Justice Karakatsanis has «written only three decisions on her own» is flat wrong.