Sentences with phrase «wrong fights in»

Not exact matches

In fact, you could say we're still fighting the Civil War, and you wouldn't be wrong.

The commonly prescribed arthritis drug Vioxx was withdrawn after it was linked with heart attacks and strokes, a drug trial which went horribly wrong left six men fighting for their lives in intensive care, hospitals were names and shamed for MRSA and Clostridium difficile deaths, and measles made a come back after public confidence in the MMR vaccine plummeted.

Last month, I spoke at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland because I believe our country is on the wrong track, and we need to solve real problems instead of fighting fake culture wars.

And of course, as I began to learn years ago, life's biggest battles are not fought in the realm of the obvious between right and wrong.

(Can't expect decent people to fight next to coloreds, can't trust colored men in a battle, don't use the army for liberal politics, the soldiers are against it, the civilians don't know what they're doing, there's a war on and this isn't the right time, etc.) It was wrong then and it is wrong now.

It does not aim to make a judgement on whether a particular conflict was right or wrong, but remembers those who fought in them either voluntarily or without choice.

In «The Crime of the Communist,» the urbane, worldly master of an Oxford college tells Father Brown that he prefers the old adage «For forms of faith let graceless zealots fight; he can't be wrong whose life is in the right.&raquIn «The Crime of the Communist,» the urbane, worldly master of an Oxford college tells Father Brown that he prefers the old adage «For forms of faith let graceless zealots fight; he can't be wrong whose life is in the right.&raquin the right.»

They don't have to use the cross, they can use any piece of rubble in that memorial, the fact that their putting up such a fight to keep it in shows how biased they are for christians, not to mention that it is wrong for the people who died that were not Christian.

Even worse, those very atheists who spend all of their time on forums like this and fighting against the truth (rather than being out enjoying the world in what little time they have) will ultimately die and go to hell only to then find out the truth — that they've been wrong about everything they've believed their whole life.

and there is nothing wrong with the name jihad since jihad actually means «fighting for your country and people» without waiting for anything in return, for the love of god there are NO 72 virgins!!!!!! freedom of speech does not mean insulting other people!

Musicians in this situation not only sense that something is wrong at the heart of things, but that they can never do anything fight.

Because despite our best intentions, if used wrong, we are in danger of perpetuating the problem we claim to be fighting against.

We didn't judge the war as at root unjust, rather as being fought in the wrong way and with too little likelihood of success.

but, when I see all these extremist bombing all over the world & EXPRESS HATE to American the land WE live in, do we not have a responsibility show up and fight against them — fight for our country USA has nothing to do with Islam — wrong is wrong no matter what religion...

As my pastor said yesterday, anyone hoping to see the type of change that Jesus fought for is putting their eggs in the wrong basket if they think anyone in the political system can bring about hope and healing for our country.

And to face the consequences of wrong doing and fight against evil and for justice for all, then we all will be in a better place.

Al fatah our prophet did not say that you are very wrong he never mentions fight you should be clear in quoting our prophet do nt be like yusef

They pointed out they saw wrong in society and fought against it.

If you say «Society decides right or wrong» then you are saying that Martin Luther King Jr., Jesus Christ, Gandhi are the most evil people ever, because they pointed out they saw wrong in society and fought (not violently) against it.

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

You are stronger for it, it's evident to yourself and us, AND you are now able to «battle» against what you believe is wrong within the church without having to spend futile time, energy and money in «fighting» the church.

These are people who have been through the turnings and churnings of modern ecumenism; they pioneered breakthroughs, fought on the barricades, and now, in the afterglow of promises failed, are eminently qualified to assess what went wrong and what might be done about it.

This causes further tensions in relations with the Canadian public and the perception of Sikhs, what we see as taking a stand and fighting what is wrong, many see as causing uneeded violence, it's a huge culture clash.

We slack in our interior struggle, we lose a sense of perspective, we fight the wrong battles, failing to judge situations objectively and with wisdom.

Some people, I know this is surprising, but some people go to church because they want to pick a fight with another Christian, or find something wrong in what the pastor said or did.

Even in fighting an enemy whom we believe to be wrong we may protest that in the enemy and that in ourselves which makes us enemies.

Instead we are taken on a gentle tour of three arguments put forward for atheism:» [T] hat conflicts fought in the name of religion are always about religion; that it is ultimately possible to know with confidence what is right and what is wrong without acknowledging the existence of God; and that atheist states are not actually atheist.»

Chris, so defending your life, fighting for your freedom of religion, speech and guns, that was wrong because he didn't believe in your flavor of god???? So, he should just let you get taken by the Taliban because he doesn't know right from wrong, being that he is non christian... good to know.

The reality is, gay marriage will be legalized, younger more reasonable and flex able generations will assure that in our life time, problably within the next few years, and those who have a misguided concept of god and think gay marriage is wrong are fighting a battle that they can not win, however, they do have the right to fight it.

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others - those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence fo the lord our God the reason we are here...

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others — those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence of the lord our God the reason we are here...

At Troas, which was close to the Troy of Homer's Iliad, that fabled city to which Paris had allured Helen and against which the Greeks fought under her wronged husband, Menelaus, in order to bring her home again, Paul had a dream of a Macedonian beseeching him to cross the sea to Macedonia and help him and his people.

Peter Hitchens, in The Spectator, argued that those who oppose gay marriage are simply fighting the wrong battle.

The fact that they are wrong shows that we still have a ways to go in fighting for our rights as citizens of the Uinited States of America.

Editor - in - chief Adam Rapoport and I have gotten in numerous fights over this, as he sees nothing wrong with a club sandwich and some crinkle - cut fries after a long flight.

Not one other Prem manager would pick the strange sides he picks, with players in the wrong positions, no shape, no fight and no hope.

I'd settle for a George Graham defence right now... might have been boring but we need some real defenders and midfielders... we were totally out fought in the mid field make up of the team was totally wrong..

someone please tell me wats wrong with welbeck, was he shot or something, even soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, would have recovered by now.

FFS what is wrong with our club... Turned down by a 29 year old one season wonder who is happy in Halifax now going for a 29 year old has been who couldn't make an impression on the Venezuelan defence... We need two quality attackers to challenge... If the frog gives a sh @@ about this club he would be splashing at least 80 m to give us a fighting chance upfront next season... But no we are going to be hearing about ze uneraldid qwolatis of Olivier and my reezpect for ze litl how u say wipit...

WE need a Costa type striker (Nothing wrong with Giroud) who can score by making his own goals apart from taking clear chances, Additional creativity to fight for OZIL (No disrespect but for 42M he has not proved to be a game changer in Big games — Better players even cost less e.g Costa, Hazard - HE MUST DO MORE) and Cazorla position.

Don't get me wrong, he has more talent and vision in his left pinkie toe than most players, but his lack of enthusiasm and fight on the pitch is extremely frustrating to watch.

Don't get me wrong, in the end Price is the one who said yes to this fight, but this screams «last ditch cash out».

I will assure all the Ozil is never in the wrong brigade, the days of an attacking midfielder that is one dimensional are long gone, just assisting and contributing nothing else to the team is in the past, all players now have to do more than just waiting for others to fight for them, as that's why Mata struggled at Chelsea under Moanrinho and he is struggling at Man United too.

Arsenal meltdown starting from January has started again that is what public has been predicted, why cant Arsenal prove public wrong, Wenger doesn't have winning competitive and fighting spirit in him, its a shame, now i want to see how we want to top Tottenham, Leicester and Man city gone for sure.

I will assure all the «Ozil is never in the wrong brigade», those days of an attacking midfielder who is one dimensional are long gone, just assisting and contributing nothing else to the team is in the past, all players now have to do more than just waiting for others to fight for them, that's why Mata struggled at Chelsea under Moanrinho and he is struggling at Man United too.

we do nt need him anymore; that was the main sentiment about fabregas and it wasnt wrong he wouldn't have offered us the fight and grit in the midfield

1) When you can not beat mid teams like Hull and Tottenham at home 2) You have no track record of beating top teams who you should be competing with 3) You struggle against any decent opposition that decides to play good football and apply themselves tactically 4) A confused manager with poor tactics, playing players in wrong position, throws a blind eye when a possible solution presents itself (Fabregas) and makes no move or poor moves in the market when he does GUYS to be honest we are at risk of losing out on 4th place with a resurgent Man U, fighting Liverpool and decent team like Everton and Southampton.

l still cant belive how bad we are i really thought we would be good this year no CL to tire out the best and a free run at the league... What a fool i was id like to say sorry to all Arsenal fans who i may have disagreed with your posts before i admit im wrong tho id love Wenger to prove the world wrong and win the league its not happing no matter how much i want it No point us fighting with each other when we all want the same even if differnet ways but you guys know deep doen we need a new Manager and some one who will kick the lasy ass bitches we have playing for 1000s pounds each week up the dam arse and make them earn what they get paid... lf someone in my job did nt do there bit i tell u wouldnt be working long.

You just see so much confidence in each fighter that you wonder who has it right and who has it all wrong and you want to find out on fight night.

Where if one party makes weight, and the other party with a history misses weight, the wronged party is compensated without having to get in a fist fight with the proven unprofessional who could be coming in with an additional advantage.