Sentences with phrase «wrong ideas as»

Nobel laureate Murray Gell - Mann is fond of saying, «The job of a scientist is to generate wrong ideas as fast as possible.»

But according to a title of one of the studies dealing with the problem it is a wrong idea as it says, «Fruit Restriction Advice for Diabetics Proven WRONG».

Not exact matches

As we went ahead with the launch, the experts and our rivals said it was the wrong idea at the wrong time, and that Virgin Atlantic Airways was doomed to failure.

I think most investors have the wrong idea about what it means to be bullish or bearish about an asset class such as stocks.

However, as an agnostic I believe atheists are still just as bigoted as theists simply because they refuse to still take up the idea they might be wrong.

They also fear it as, in the back of their mind, there is always this tiny idea scratching at their mind saying «What if you're wrong???».

Second there are plenty of people who come to their faith as it were through something more than bible verses its called critical thinking people can critically think their way to the idea that they are rather small beings in a relatively huge universe and that they realize that they can't know everything and leave some things including the nature of the universe to faith and acknowledge it as faith if that's how they see the world fine is there anything particularly wrong with that?

To attack a proposal as supposedly being wrong simply because it is spoken by Someone the Speaker does not like is argumentum ad hominem, is logically invalid, and strongly suggests said Speaker has no real way discrediting the * ideas * put forth in said proposal.

I repeat: I hope I am wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to say, but without any real belief in the idea itself?

Unchecked, ijtihad might even lead to disagreement concerning such basic ideas as right and wrong, good and bad!

And the idea that, as a wife, I would need to «become passive» or smaller or somehow less in order to make my marriage work is damaging and wrong.

I can see how one can look at this idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.

He seems obsessed with the idea that because people don't all agree with him on issues such as gay marriage that it is essential we all look to the bible to figure out what's ethical and moral, and all assume that it is the final word on what's right or wrong.

The ideas of God, Man, Right and Wrong, Suffering, Fellowship with God, and Immortality have been traced, each by itself, as each progresses through the two Testaments.

The fact that people continue to suggest otherwise and perpetuate this idea that homosexuality is wrong and attempting to make outcasts of people who identify as gay is unbelievably disgusting and frightening and old - fashioned.

For in the Old Covenant such as it appeared in history there was much that was right and willed by God, but there were also a great many errors, wrong developments and depraved ideas, while there was no permanent infallible authority to separate the two.

Be prepared for this as it will get worse since those talked about here do nt really know what the Bible says and continue to post other peoples wrong ideas and lies about what it says.

I think this data is «bad», the students are «wrong», the scence is «awful» and they should «think» and use «reason» as they «question» the ideas behond the tweets.

Come on... I do see scientific theories as interesting — However, I am open to the idea that it is all wrong, even the theories that were «proven» and became «fact» — Why?

I've seen this all or nothing trick and its wrong wrong wrong, just as much as the people that use it think the idea they refute is.

It sometimes came across as a very shallow view of faith and could give off the wrong idea about what it's like to follow Jesus.

In addition to stating their own views, actors are likely to engage in real or imaginary dialogue with their competitors, attempt to debunk or neutralize competing ideas, or use them as illustrations of wrong - headed or unworkable proposals.

Mike, not me has just used your abhorrence at the idea of carrying out an act that his god specifically commands as an argument that you have instilled in you an objective sense of right and wrong... of which that same god is the source.

But it would be wrong to suppose that he so «spiritualized» the idea of the kingdom of God as to make it relevant only to the inner life of the individual.

People tend to have this wrong idea that someone sat down and put the Bible together as one would write a novel.

Seriously, I remember when I was in college, there would be these people, called professors, that would even say my answer is wrong and give me points off my test... the nerve of them how dare they not be open to my ideas and beliefs as to how physics work, or what Poe point was, or what actually happen during Roman occupation....

There is nothing wrong with serving this audience, but as a tool for introducing people to ideas is problematic.

the idea here, as I understand it, is that we are made in a certain way, and when things hurt it's because somethings wrong, like you say — «I find that if I ignore that part (the creative part) of me for too long, then I begin to suffer.»

But, also, any human with common sense knows that at this time, all religions and creeds known to men - are full of crap and instill separatism among groups of humans as if one is more valuable to God - they guy who supposedly made everyone and everything - separatistic ideas as «my book» my god» «my people» are the most beloved by God are wrong, will be always wrong and all religions are wrong and will always be wrong.

The genius of Newman's idea is that Mary comes to symbolise not only the faith of the unlearned, but of the Doctors of the Church also, who need «to investigate, and weigh, and define, as well as to profess the Gospel; to draw the line between truth and heresy; to anticipate or remedy the various aberrations of wrong reason; to combat pride and recklessness with one's own arms; and thus to triumph over the sophist and the innovator.»

Ideas are often challenged and rejected as wrong and later proven to be true.

Or the pair of evangelical professors who wrote an article in The New York Times, criticizing evangelical leaders for their «rejection of knowledge» and for embracing «discredited, ridiculous and even dangerous ideas» — such as believing that homosexual behavior is sinful and that Darwin was wrong.

In particular, he continued his claim that the ideas of congruence and measurement as understood in the orthodox theories of relativity were not only wrong, but meaningless.

Cherry picking or dismissing the word of God (as is the case with 1 Corinthians 11) in order to justify our own idea of what is right and wrong is the result of listening to the lies of the serpent.

The idea that these two are opposite is simply wrong... passion has an important place as a motivator in science, and science has an important role as informer of emotions.

It is not necessary for certain ideas to have evolved, as is evidenced by other cultures (not to say in any way that they are wrong, however, there are practices that oppose the morals ingrained in us by the society we live in) so could a parent raise perfectly good children without the bible, in this day in age, probably yes, but you must recognize, that much of what they will be teaching will come from their society, adn quite honestly I'm not sure honoring your parents, and not killing are such a bad thing.

At a time when there were wrong ideas about the shape of the earth, the Bible referred to it as a circle, or sphere.

As truth in advertising and a little witnessing to boot, what's wrong with the idea of the iconology on the shingle?

i like the idea that your keen on defending your community from anything that stops it being what God intended to be, but intentional communities, as in your intentionaly following Jesus together have pressures to it, its spiritual war, don't give in to the wrong pressures, just submit to the ultimate pressure in Jesus.

As to the substance of Mr. Redlich's comment, he is entirely right in his devotion to religious freedom, diversity, and peace, and, in my view, entirely wrong in his idea of how those great goods might be preserved and protected.

Oh, here is one gen I plucked from your babble that is a xtian idea that most would take as being wrong.

Any ideas as to what went wrong or what I may do differently?

Any ideas as to what went wrong?

It's also not a bad idea to have, as back - up, some of those frozen dumpling skins I abhor and even a couple of bags of frozen dumplings just in case things go wrong.

Do you have any ideas as to what went wrong?

He talked about the way there are no real superstars at the club and every player is treated as an equal and also about how people can get the wrong idea about footballers just from what they see on the pitch.

What makes my blood boil is the AOB telling me what's wrong with the club, the lack of tactics, player investment etc... but then never come up with ideas that can then be as intensely scrutinized as AOB's are with Wenger.

The idea he is incapable of giving as much to a national soccer team as someone who only feels attached to one country is easily proven wrong by the likes of Jones, Brooks, Ramos, and Stewart.

I'm not someone who wave away people's opinion and idea because what i see as completely wrong others see as completely right.

The idea that as an Arsenal fan you are entitled to win league trophies, just seems to everything that is wrong with the new entitled generation.